IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jcommo/v1y2022i2p9-151d968599.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating the Economic and Environmental Repercussions of the Price Paradox in Natural Resource Commodities: Market Drivers and Potential Challenges for Sustainable Development

Author

Listed:
  • Tayyba Rashad

    (Department of Economics, The University of Haripur, Haripur Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Haripur 22063, Pakistan)

  • Khalid Zaman

    (Department of Economics, The University of Haripur, Haripur Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Haripur 22063, Pakistan)

  • Haroon ur Rashid Khan

    (Faculty of Business, The University of Wollongong in Dubai, Dubai 20183, United Arab Emirates)

  • Awais Rashid

    (Department of Management Sciences, COMSATS University Islamabad, Abbottabad Campus, Abbottabad 22060, Pakistan)

Abstract

The natural resource commodity price paradox is a phenomenon that has been observed in the past. The price of a commodity constantly and unpredictably fluctuates. This phenomenon makes it difficult for businesses to plan for future needs and investments. This study examined the relationship between natural resource commodity prices, renewable energy demand, economic growth, high-technology exports, inbound FDI, and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in Pakistan, using the 1975 to 2020 time period. The robust least squares (RLS) regression results showed that natural resource commodity prices and economic growth increased GHG emissions. In contrast, there was a negative relationship between renewable energy demand (and high-tech exports) and GHG emissions in Pakistan. The results verified the resource price curse hypothesis and growth-associated emissions in a country. The Granger causality estimates showed the unidirectional relationship of renewable energy consumption with GHG emissions, natural resource pricing, and inbound FDI. Further, high-technology exports Granger caused GHG emissions and GDP per capita. The results verified the country’s growth-led green energy sources and inbound FDI, resource pricing-led inbound FDI, and GHG emissions-led resource pricing. The impulse response function suggested that resource commodity pricing and the country’s economic growth will likely increase GHG emissions in the next ten years. At the same time, green energy demand, technological advancements, and sustainable investment in cleaner production would help decrease GHG emissions over time. The variance decomposition analysis suggested that technology advancements would likely have greater variance shock on GHG emissions, followed by commodity resource pricing and green energy demand. The resource price paradox hampers economic and environmental outcomes, which need to be resolved through advancement in cleaner production technologies, adoption of green energy demand, and stabilization of resource commodity pricing that helps to move forward toward the sustainable development of the country.

Suggested Citation

  • Tayyba Rashad & Khalid Zaman & Haroon ur Rashid Khan & Awais Rashid, 2022. "Evaluating the Economic and Environmental Repercussions of the Price Paradox in Natural Resource Commodities: Market Drivers and Potential Challenges for Sustainable Development," Commodities, MDPI, vol. 1(2), pages 1-25, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jcommo:v:1:y:2022:i:2:p:9-151:d:968599
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2813-2432/1/2/9/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2813-2432/1/2/9/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Khan, Anwar & Chenggang, Yang & Hussain, Jamal & Bano, Sadia & Nawaz, AAmir, 2020. "Natural resources, tourism development, and energy-growth-CO2 emission nexus: A simultaneity modeling analysis of BRI countries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    2. Yue, Xianghua & Peng, Michael Yao-Ping & Anser, Muhammad Khalid & Nassani, Abdelmohsen A. & Haffar, Mohamed & Zaman, Khalid, 2022. "The role of carbon taxes, clean fuels, and renewable energy in promoting sustainable development: How green is nuclear energy?," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 167-178.
    3. Muhammad Khalid Anser & Zahid Yousaf & Usama Awan & Abdelmohsen A. Nassani & Muhammad Moinuddin Qazi Abro & Khalid Zaman, 2020. "Identifying the Carbon Emissions Damage to International Tourism: Turn a Blind Eye," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-20, March.
    4. Yao, Xing & Yasmeen, Rizwana & Hussain, Jamal & Hassan Shah, Wasi Ul, 2021. "The repercussions of financial development and corruption on energy efficiency and ecological footprint: Evidence from BRICS and next 11 countries," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    5. Wang, Yafei & Liao, Meng & Wang, Yafei & Xu, Lixiao & Malik, Arunima, 2021. "The impact of foreign direct investment on China's carbon emissions through energy intensity and emissions trading system," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    6. Tang, Chang & Irfan, Muhammad & Razzaq, Asif & Dagar, Vishal, 2022. "Natural resources and financial development: Role of business regulations in testing the resource-curse hypothesis in ASEAN countries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    7. Wu Xiaoman & Abdul Majeed & Dinara G. Vasbieva & Claire Emilienne Wati Yameogo & Nazim Hussain, 2021. "Natural resources abundance, economic globalization, and carbon emissions: Advancing sustainable development agenda," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(5), pages 1037-1048, September.
    8. Muhammad Kamran Khan & Muhammad Imran Khan & Muhammad Rehan, 2020. "The relationship between energy consumption, economic growth and carbon dioxide emissions in Pakistan," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 6(1), pages 1-13, December.
    9. Shittu, Waliu & Adedoyin, Festus Fatai & Shah, Muhammad Ibrahim & Musibau, Hammed Oluwaseyi, 2021. "An investigation of the nexus between natural resources, environmental performance, energy security and environmental degradation: Evidence from Asia," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    10. Tzai-Chiao Lee & Muhammad Khalid Anser & Abdelmohsen A. Nassani & Mohamed Haffar & Khalid Zaman & Muhammad Moinuddin Qazi Abro, 2021. "Managing Natural Resources through Sustainable Environmental Actions: A Cross-Sectional Study of 138 Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-19, November.
    11. Ene Ene Edet & James, Tumba Henry & Effiong Charles Efefiom & Ishaku Rimamtanung Nyiputen & Eduno, Ededet Bassey, 2022. "Electricity Supply and Manufacturing Sector Output in Nigeria," Energy Economics Letters, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 9(1), pages 44-54.
    12. Anyanwu, Ugochukwu Michael & Anyanwu, Amarachukwu Anthony & Cieślik, Andrzej, 2021. "Does abundant natural resources amplify the negative impact of income inequality on economic growth?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Tianyu & Umar, Muhammad & Mirza, Nawazish & Yue, Xiao-Guang, 2023. "Green financing and resources utilization: A story of N-11 economies in the climate change era," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 1174-1184.
    2. Rafei, Meysam & Esmaeili, Parisa & Balsalobre-Lorente, Daniel, 2022. "A step towards environmental mitigation: How do economic complexity and natural resources matter? Focusing on different institutional quality level countries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    3. Wang, Zhongbao & Razzaq, Asif, 2022. "Natural resources, energy efficiency transition and sustainable development: Evidence from BRICS economies," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    4. Jahanger, Atif & Hossain, Mohammad Razib & Usman, Muhammad & Chukwuma Onwe, Joshua, 2023. "Recent scenario and nexus between natural resource dependence, energy use and pollution cycles in BRICS region: Does the mediating role of human capital exist?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    5. Guo, Yongqin & Deng, Jianghua & Liu, Xinyu, 2023. "None-linear nexus between natural resources dependency, foreign direct investment, and environmental sustainability in newly industrialized countries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    6. Liu, Yang & Wang, Jianda & Dong, Kangyin & Taghizadeh-Hesary, Farhad, 2023. "How does natural resource abundance affect green total factor productivity in the era of green finance? Global evidence," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    7. Yang, Xiao & Anser, Muhammad Khalid & Yusop, Zulkornain & Abbas, Shujaat & Khan, Muhammad Azhar & Zaman, Khalid, 2022. "Volatility in mineral resource pricing causes ecological footprints: A cloud on the horizon," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    8. Yang, Bin & Wu, Qiong & Sharif, Arshian & Uddin, Gazi Salah, 2023. "Non-linear impact of natural resources, green financing, and energy transition on sustainable environment: A way out for common prosperity in NORDIC countries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    9. Khan, Zeeshan & Hossain, Mohammad Razib & Badeeb, Ramez Abubakr & Zhang, Changyong, 2023. "Aggregate and disaggregate impact of natural resources on economic performance: Role of green growth and human capital," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    10. Fiza Shaheen & Muhammad Saeed Lodhi & Joanna Rosak-Szyrocka & Khalid Zaman & Usama Awan & Muhammad Asif & Waqas Ahmed & Maria Siddique, 2022. "Cleaner Technology and Natural Resource Management: An Environmental Sustainability Perspective from China," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 4(3), pages 1-23, June.
    11. Xie, Bofeng & Rehman, Mubeen Abdur & Zhang, Junyan & Yang, Runze, 2022. "Does the financialization of natural resources lead toward sustainability? An application of advance panel Granger non-causality," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    12. Li, Rongrong & Wang, Qiang & Li, Lejia & Hu, Sailan, 2023. "Do natural resource rent and corruption governance reshape the environmental Kuznets curve for ecological footprint? Evidence from 158 countries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PB).
    13. Bashir, Muhammad Farhan & Shahbaz, Muhammad & Malik, Muhammad Nasir & Ma, Beiling & Wang, Jianming, 2023. "Energy transition, natural resource consumption and environmental degradation: The role of geopolitical risk in sustainable development," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PA).
    14. Asif Razzaq & Arshian Sharif & Paiman Ahmad & Kittisak Jermsittiparsert, 2021. "Asymmetric role of tourism development and technology innovation on carbon dioxide emission reduction in the Chinese economy: Fresh insights from QARDL approach," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(1), pages 176-193, January.
    15. Liang, Jinhao & Irfan, Muhammad & Ikram, Muhammad & Zimon, Dominik, 2022. "Evaluating natural resources volatility in an emerging economy: The influence of solar energy development barriers," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    16. Irfan, Muhammad & Abdur Rehman, Mubeen & Liu, Xuemei & Razzaq, Asif, 2022. "Interlinkages between mineral resources, financial markets, and sustainable energy sources: Evidence from minerals exporting countries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    17. Ngo Thai Hung, 2022. "Time–frequency nexus between globalization, financial development, natural resources and carbon emissions in Vietnam," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 55(4), pages 2293-2315, November.
    18. Tadadjeu, Sosson & Njangang, Henri & Woldemichael, Andinet, 2023. "Are resource-rich countries less responsive to global warming? Oil wealth and climate change policy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    19. Zhang, Wei & Wang, Yaru & Fan, Fengchun, 2023. "How does coordinated development of two-way foreign direct investment affect natural resources Utilization?——Spatial analysis based on China's coal resource utilization efficiency," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PA).
    20. Saud, Shah & Haseeb, Abdul & Zafar, Muhammad Wasif & Li, Huiyun, 2023. "Articulating natural resource abundance, economic complexity, education and environmental sustainability in MENA countries: Evidence from advanced panel estimation," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jcommo:v:1:y:2022:i:2:p:9-151:d:968599. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.