IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v13y2023i7p1298-d1178679.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From Large to Powerful: International Comparison, Challenges and Strategic Choices for China’s Livestock Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Zizhong Shi

    (Institute of Agricultural Economics and Development, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Junru Li

    (College of Economics and Management, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Xiangdong Hu

    (Institute of Agricultural Economics and Development, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China)

Abstract

Accelerating the construction of a strong livestock industry is of great significance to better guarantee the supply of livestock products and improve the quality, efficiency and competitiveness of the industry. This study constructed an evaluation index system including supply security, scientific and technological support, industrial resilience and international trade to evaluate the strength of China’s livestock industry, and then conducted an in-depth analysis of the issues and challenges of the construction of a livestock powerhouse. The research results showed that China’s livestock industry ranked 5th in the world, such that China was transitioning from being a large-producing livestock country to being a livestock powerhouse, although improvement was still needed to reach the goal. There were significant differences across species. China’s layer industry was a world leader; the pig, sheep and goat, and broiler industries were strong; and the beef cattle and dairy industries were weaker. There are still many challenges, such as the fact that the domestic supply security capacity needs to be strengthened, the level of scientific and technological support needs to be improved, the modern operation system needs to be sound, the industry and supply chain are not highly resilient, the international trade risks are increasing, and the policy support system needs to be improved. It is recommended to improve the institutional mechanism for the construction of the livestock industry, promote a high level of self-reliance and self-improvement in science and technology, build a modern livestock operation system, enhance the resilience and security level of the industry and supply chain, and consolidate and expand international trade and cooperation.

Suggested Citation

  • Zizhong Shi & Junru Li & Xiangdong Hu, 2023. "From Large to Powerful: International Comparison, Challenges and Strategic Choices for China’s Livestock Industry," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-21, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:7:p:1298-:d:1178679
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/7/1298/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/7/1298/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kumar, Anjani & Ali, Jabir & Singh, Harbir, 2001. "Trade in Livestock Products in India: Trends, Performance and Competitiveness," Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Indian Society of Agricultural Economics, vol. 56(4), December.
    2. Matthew Gorton & Alina Daniłowska & Sławomir Jarka & Sławomir Straszewski & Aldona Zawojska & Edward Majewski, 2001. "The International Competitiveness of Polish Agriculture," Post-Communist Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(4), pages 445-457.
    3. Ding, Huiping & Fu, Yanan & Zheng, Lucy & Yan, Zhu, 2019. "Determinants of the competitive advantage of dairy supply chains: Evidence from the Chinese dairy industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 360-373.
    4. Adcock, Flynn J. & Hudson, Darren & Rosson, C. Parr, III & Harris, Harold M., Jr. & Herndon, Cary W., Jr., 2006. "The Global Competitiveness of the North American Livestock Industry," Choices: The Magazine of Food, Farm, and Resource Issues, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 21(3), pages 1-6.
    5. Ma, Meilin & Wang, H. Holly & Hua, Yizhou & Qin, Fei & Yang, Jing, 2021. "African swine fever in China: Impacts, responses, and policy implications," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    6. Gong, Xu & Xu, Jun, 2022. "Geopolitical risk and dynamic connectedness between commodity markets," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shijia Cai & Bo Gao & Jie Zhou & Guanghua Qiao, 2023. "The Impact of Informal Learning on Herders’ Operating Income: An Analysis Based on Human Capital Differences," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-16, August.
    2. Lin Ru & Luyu Ding & Shuhui Deng & Qifeng Li & Wanying Zhao & Rong Wang & Jiawei Li & Yujian Lu & Chunxia Yao, 2023. "Distribution Characteristics and Factors Influencing Culturable Bacterial Bioaerosols on a Dairy Farm in Northern China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-24, September.
    3. Aistė Galnaitytė & Irena Kriščiukaitienė & Virginia Namiotko & Vida Dabkienė, 2023. "Assessment of the Lithuanian Pig Farming Sector via Prospective Farm Size," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-19, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Xiao-Qing & Wu, Tong & Zhong, Huaming & Su, Chi-Wei, 2023. "Bubble behaviors in nickel price: What roles do geopolitical risk and speculation play?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    2. Zhang, Zhikai & Wang, Yudong & Xiao, Jihong & Zhang, Yaojie, 2023. "Not all geopolitical shocks are alike: Identifying price dynamics in the crude oil market under tensions," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    3. Yuhang Bai & Kuixing Han & Lichun Xiong & Yifei Li & Rundong Liao & Fengting Wang, 2022. "Differences and Factors of Raw Milk Productivity between China and the United States," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-13, November.
    4. Milena Bojovic & Andrew McGregor, 2023. "A review of megatrends in the global dairy sector: what are the socioecological implications?," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 40(1), pages 373-394, March.
    5. Jie Pang & Juan Yin & Guangchang Lu & Shimei Li, 2023. "Supply and Demand Changes, Pig Epidemic Shocks, and Pork Price Fluctuations: An Empirical Study Based on an SVAR Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-16, August.
    6. Huang, Jionghao & Chen, Baifan & Xu, Yushi & Xia, Xiaohua, 2023. "Time-frequency volatility transmission among energy commodities and financial markets during the COVID-19 pandemic: A Novel TVP-VAR frequency connectedness approach," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    7. Qi, Haozhi & Wu, Tiantian & Chen, Hao & Lu, Xiuling, 2023. "Time-frequency connectedness and cross-quantile dependence between carbon emission trading and commodity markets: Evidence from China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    8. Lu, Chengwu & Zafar, Muhammad Wasif & Cevik, Emrah I. & Destek, Mehmet Akif & Bugan, Mehmet Fatih, 2023. "Time and quantile domain connectedness between the geopolitical risk of China and precious metals markets," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PA).
    9. Gorton, Matthew & Davidova, Sophia & Banse, Martin & Bailey, Alistair, 2005. "A magyar mezőgazdaság nemzetközi versenyképessége - múltbeli teljesítmény és jövőkép [International competitiveness of Hungarian agriculture: past performance and future projections]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(1), pages 66-80.
    10. Foglia, Matteo & Palomba, Giulio & Tedeschi, Marco, 2023. "Disentangling the geopolitical risk and its effects on commodities. Evidence from a panel of G8 countries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PB).
    11. Zouhaier Dhifaoui & Kaies Ncibi & Faicel Gasmi & Abulmajeed Abdallah Alqarni, 2023. "The Nexus between Climate Change and Geopolitical Risk Index in Saudi Arabia Based on the Fourier-Domain Transfer Entropy Spectrum Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-22, September.
    12. Chaplin, Hannah & Davidova, Sophia & Gorton, Matthew, 2005. "Impediments to Employment and Enterprise Diversification: Evidence from Small-Scale Farms in Poland," 2005 International Congress, August 23-27, 2005, Copenhagen, Denmark 24760, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    13. Karkowska, Renata & Urjasz, Szczepan, 2023. "How does the Russian-Ukrainian war change connectedness and hedging opportunities? Comparison between dirty and clean energy markets versus global stock indices," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    14. Kristína Hudecová & Miroslava Rajčániová, 2023. "The impact of geopolitical risk on agricultural commodity prices," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 69(4), pages 129-139.
    15. Liu, Hongda & Huang, Feipeng & Huang, Jialiang, 2022. "Measuring the coordination decision of renewable energy as a natural resource contracts based on rights structure and corporate social responsibility from economic recovery," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    16. J. Sauer & B. Balint, 2008. "Distorted prices and producer efficiency: the case of Romania," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 29(2), pages 131-142, April.
    17. Yerzhan Raushanov & Turekhan B. Akhmetov, 2023. "Industrial policy impact on competitiveness of companies and sustainable development in post-communist Kazakhstan," RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA', FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 0(1), pages 167-186.
    18. Furuoka, Fumitaka & Yaya, OlaOluwa Simon & Ling, Pui Kiew & Al-Faryan, Mamdouh Abdulaziz Saleh & Islam, M. Nazmul, 2023. "Transmission of risks between energy and agricultural commodities: Frequency time-varying VAR, asymmetry and portfolio management," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    19. Wang, Yihan & Bouri, Elie & Fareed, Zeeshan & Dai, Yuhui, 2022. "Geopolitical risk and the systemic risk in the commodity markets under the war in Ukraine," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    20. Chen‐Ti Chen & John M. Crespi & William Hahn & Lee L. Schulz & Fawzi Taha, 2020. "Long‐run impacts of trade shocks and export competitiveness: Evidence from the U.S. BSE event," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 51(6), pages 941-958, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:7:p:1298-:d:1178679. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.