IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v11y2021i7p623-d587060.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mango Postharvest Technologies: An Observational Study of the Yieldwise Initiative in Kenya

Author

Listed:
  • Hory Chikez

    (Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering, Iowa State University, 1340 Elings Hall, 605 Bissell Road, Ames, IA 50011, USA)

  • Dirk Maier

    (Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering, Iowa State University, 1340 Elings Hall, 605 Bissell Road, Ames, IA 50011, USA)

  • Steve Sonka

    (Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering, Iowa State University, 1340 Elings Hall, 605 Bissell Road, Ames, IA 50011, USA
    Ed Snider Center for Enterprise and Markets, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA)

Abstract

Several studies have evaluated the effects of postharvest technologies on postharvest loss (PHL) incurred at a single stage of a food value chain. However, very few studies have assessed the effect of multiple technologies on PHL incurred at various stages of a food value chain. This study evaluated the effect of five technologies (harvesting tools, cold stores, plastic crates, fruit fly traps, and ground tarps) promoted by the Rockefeller Foundation Yieldwise Initiative (YWI) in Kenya on PHL incurred at three mango value chain stages (harvest, transportation, and point of sale). After extensive screening of the YWI data, the Kruskal–Wallis statistical test was used to compare each YWI promoted technology to smallholder farmers (SHF) traditional practices. Results indicated that plastic crates used to transport or store mangos and fruit fly traps used to attract and kill fruit flies were statistically significant ( p < 0.05) in reducing PHL at the point of sale. Meanwhile, no statistical evidence of PHL reduction was observed from SHF using harvesting tools, cold stores, and ground tarps. Cold stores were the least adopted of the promoted technologies due to their high costs of implementation and utilization. While this study asserts that increased technology adoption is associated with PHL reduction, further research is needed to identify additional factors that favor technologies’ efficacy in reducing PHL in similar food value chains.

Suggested Citation

  • Hory Chikez & Dirk Maier & Steve Sonka, 2021. "Mango Postharvest Technologies: An Observational Study of the Yieldwise Initiative in Kenya," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-16, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:11:y:2021:i:7:p:623-:d:587060
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/7/623/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/7/623/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael R. Carter & Rachid Laajaj & Dean Yang, 2014. "Subsidies and the Persistence of Technology Adoption: Field Experimental Evidence from Mozambique," NBER Working Papers 20465, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Hua Xie & Nicostrato Perez & Weston Anderson & Claudia Ringler & Liangzhi You, 2018. "Can Sub-Saharan Africa feed itself? The role of irrigation development in the region’s drylands for food security," Water International, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(6), pages 796-814, August.
    3. T.A.M. Pugh & C. Müller & J. Elliott & D. Deryng & C. Folberth & S. Olin & E. Schmid & A. Arneth, 2016. "Climate analogues suggest limited potential for intensification of production on current croplands under climate change," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 7(1), pages 1-8, November.
    4. Schwertman, Neil C. & Owens, Margaret Ann & Adnan, Robiah, 2004. "A simple more general boxplot method for identifying outliers," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 165-174, August.
    5. de Boer, Joop & Aiking, Harry, 2011. "On the merits of plant-based proteins for global food security: Marrying macro and micro perspectives," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(7), pages 1259-1265, May.
    6. Tanya Stathers & Deirdre Holcroft & Lisa Kitinoja & Brighton M. Mvumi & Alicia English & Oluwatoba Omotilewa & Megan Kocher & Jessica Ault & Maximo Torero, 2020. "A scoping review of interventions for crop postharvest loss reduction in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 3(10), pages 821-835, October.
    7. Sheahan, Megan & Barrett, Christopher B., 2017. "Review: Food loss and waste in Sub-Saharan Africa," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 1-12.
    8. Affognon, Hippolyte & Mutungi, Christopher & Sanginga, Pascal & Borgemeister, Christian, 2015. "Unpacking Postharvest Losses in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Meta-Analysis," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 49-68.
    9. Wu, Wenbin & Yu, Qiangyi & You, Liangzhi & Chen, Kevin & Tang, Huajun & Liu, Jianguo, 2018. "Global cropping intensity gaps: Increasing food production without cropland expansion," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 515-525.
    10. Oluwatoba J Omotilewa & Jacob Ricker-Gilbert & John Herbert Ainembabazi, 2019. "Subsidies for Agricultural Technology Adoption: Evidence from a Randomized Experiment with Improved Grain Storage Bags in Uganda," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 101(3), pages 753-772.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dirk E. Maier & Hory Chikez, 2021. "Recent Innovations in Post-Harvest Preservation and Protection of Agricultural Products," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-5, December.
    2. Hory Chikez & Dirk Maier & Sigurdur Olafsson & Steve Sonka, 2023. "Identifying Critical Drivers of Mango, Tomato, and Maize Postharvest Losses (PHL) in Low-Income Countries and Predicting Their Impact," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-27, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Klara Strecker & Verena Bitzer & Froukje Kruijssen, 2022. "Critical stages for post-harvest losses and nutrition outcomes in the value chains of bush beans and nightshade in Uganda," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 14(2), pages 411-426, April.
    2. Oluwatoba J. Omotilewa & Dieudonne Baributsa, 2022. "Assessing the Private Sector’s Efforts in Improving the Supply Chain of Hermetic Bags in East Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-16, October.
    3. Xue Qu & Daizo Kojima & Laping Wu & Mitsuyoshi Ando, 2021. "The Losses in the Rice Harvest Process: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-25, August.
    4. Vandercasteelen, Joachim & Christiaensen, Luc, 2020. "Breaking down silos: On post-harvest loss interventions in Tanzania," Policy briefs 1247693176, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    5. Chegere, Martin Julius, 2018. "Post-harvest losses reduction by small-scale maize farmers: The role of handling practices," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 103-115.
    6. Shen, Ge & Yu, Qiangyi & Zhou, Qingbo & Wang, Cong & Wu, Wenbin, 2023. "From multiple cropping frequency to multiple cropping system: A new perspective for the characterization of cropland use intensity," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    7. Groote, Hugo De & Muteti, Francisca, 2021. "Estimating on-Farm Storage Losses in Maize Using Community Surveys in Kenya," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315309, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    8. Cattaneo, Andrea & Sánchez, Marco V. & Torero, Máximo & Vos, Rob, 2021. "Reducing food loss and waste: Five challenges for policy and research," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    9. Tesfaye, Wondimagegn & Tirivayi, Nyasha, 2018. "The impacts of postharvest storage innovations on food security and welfare in Ethiopia," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 52-67.
    10. Christopher Mutungi & Julius Manda & Shiferaw Feleke & Adebayo Abass & Mateete Bekunda & Irmgard Hoschle-Zeledon & Gundula Fischer, 2023. "Adoption and impacts of improved post-harvest technologies on food security and welfare of maize-farming households in Tanzania: a comparative assessment," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 15(4), pages 1007-1023, August.
    11. Fabi, Carola & Cachia, Franck & Conforti, Piero & English, Alicia & Rosero Moncayo, José, 2021. "Improving data on food losses and waste: From theory to practice," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    12. Beye, Assane & Komarek, Adam M., 2020. "Quantification and benefits of reducing post-harvest losses: Evidence for vegetables in Senegal," Discussion Papers 305681, University of Bonn, Center for Development Research (ZEF).
    13. Shukla, Pallavi & Pullabhotla, Hemant K. & Baylis, Kathy, 2022. "Trouble with zero: The limits of subsidizing technology adoption," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    14. Brander, Michael & Bernauer, Thomas & Huss, Matthias, 2021. "Improved on-farm storage reduces seasonal food insecurity of smallholder farmer households – Evidence from a randomized control trial in Tanzania," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    15. Apurba Shee & Sarah Mayanja & Eria Simba & Tanya Stathers & Aurelie Bechoff & Ben Bennett, 2019. "Determinants of postharvest losses along smallholder producers maize and Sweetpotato value chains: an ordered Probit analysis," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 11(5), pages 1101-1120, October.
    16. Omotilewa, Oluwatoba J. & Ricker-Gilbert, Jacob & Ainembabazi, John Herbert & Shively, Gerald E., 2018. "Does improved storage technology promote modern input use and food security? Evidence from a randomized trial in Uganda," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 176-198.
    17. Hory Chikez & Dirk Maier & Sigurdur Olafsson & Steve Sonka, 2023. "Identifying Critical Drivers of Mango, Tomato, and Maize Postharvest Losses (PHL) in Low-Income Countries and Predicting Their Impact," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-27, September.
    18. Monika Verma & Christine Plaisier & Coen P. A. van Wagenberg & Thom Achterbosch, 2019. "A Systems Approach to Food Loss and Solutions: Understanding Practices, Causes, and Indicators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-22, January.
    19. Daniel Faibil & Martin Agyemang & Owusu Amponsah & Himanshu Gupta & Simonov Kusi-Sarpong, 2021. "Assessing drivers of post-harvest losses: tangible and intangible resources’ perspective," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(11), pages 15785-15829, November.
    20. Christine Plaisier & Milindi Sibomana & Johannes Van der Waal & Luud Clercx & Coen P. A. Van Wagenberg & Youri Dijkxhoorn, 2019. "Approach for Designing Context-Specific, Locally Owned Interventions to Reduce Postharvest Losses: Case Study on Tomato Value Chains in Nigeria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:11:y:2021:i:7:p:623-:d:587060. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.