IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/fan/quaqua/vhtml10.3280-qua2013-099007.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dal mercato del lavoro al mercato della conoscenza. Proposte operative

Author

Listed:
  • Emilio Rago

Abstract

Per avvicinare gli studenti al mondo del lavoro l?universit? ha sviluppato nel tempo approcci e strategie diversi: progetti sul campo, testimonianze aziendali, incarichi a professionisti esterni per insegnamenti specialistici o di frontiera, stage, uffici di placement, formazione extra-curriculare, eventi di presentazione delle aziende. L?attuale riforma dell?alto apprendistato facilita ulteriormente tale relazione, semplificando l?incontro tra studenti in alta formazione o ricerca e datori di lavoro. Il sentore ? che questi interventi possano comunque non bastare, poich? non affrontano le questioni di fondo che condizionano le relazioni tra il mondo dell?universit? e quello del lavoro. Le considerazioni qui presentate problematizzano la situazione da un punto di vista differente. Universit? e azienda sono concepiti come due interlocutori fondamentali dell?offerta e della domanda di conoscenza. Nel mercato della conoscenza bisogna affrontare le questioni epistemologiche, pedagogiche e politiche che influenzano i processi di produzione e diffusione di conoscenza dal lato dell?offerta, e dal lato della domanda occorre intervenire sulle problematiche pi? diffuse che impediscono una reale formazione integrale per lo sviluppo personale e professionale del lavoratore, formazione quanto mai necessaria per affrontare la complessit?, l?instabilit? e l?incertezza del mercato del lavoro contemporaneo. La proposta di riflessione vuole interessarsi sia delle dinamiche interne all?offerta di conoscenza e alla domanda di competenza, sia sui vari meccanismi di interazione che potrebbero facilitare questa transazione cognitiva. Permane, lungo tutto il ragionamento, la forte attenzione al valore dei metodi cooperativi nell?apprendimento universitario, organizzativo e tra i diffe renti operatori della conoscenza, per la creazione di quella saggezza pratica, la phronesis aristotelica, che vuole superare la tradizionale divisione tra teoria e pratica nel mondo della conoscenza. Le considerazioni nascono nell?ambito delle scienze manageriali, ma taluni ragionamenti, mutatis mutandis, possono essere applicati anche ad altri ambiti scientificodisciplinari

Suggested Citation

  • Emilio Rago, 2013. "Dal mercato del lavoro al mercato della conoscenza. Proposte operative," QUADERNI DI ECONOMIA DEL LAVORO, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2013(99), pages 119-148.
    • Handle: RePEc:fan:quaqua:v:html10.3280/qua2013-099007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.francoangeli.it/riviste/Scheda_Rivista.aspx?IDArticolo=48482&Tipo=ArticoloPDF
    Download Restriction: Single articles can be downloaded buying download credits, for info: https://www.francoangeli.it/DownloadCredit
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elster,Jon, 1983. "Explaining Technical Change," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521270724.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gabriella Pappad?, 2014. "Quale politica del lavoro per i giovani nel mezzogiorno: riflessioni sulla garanzia giovani," QUADERNI DI ECONOMIA DEL LAVORO, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2014(102), pages 7-28.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Brian J. Glenn, 2001. "Collective Precommitment From Temptation," Rationality and Society, , vol. 13(2), pages 185-204, May.
    2. Fritz W. Scharpf, 1991. "Games Real Actors Could Play: The Challenge of Complexity," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 3(3), pages 277-304, July.
    3. Argandoña, Antonio, 2007. "Anthropological and ethical foundations of organization theory," IESE Research Papers D/707, IESE Business School.
    4. Carina Altreiter & Claudius Graebner & Stephan Puehringer & Ana Rogojanu & Georg Wolfmayr, 2020. "Theorizing competition: an interdisciplinary framework," ICAE Working Papers 120, Johannes Kepler University, Institute for Comprehensive Analysis of the Economy.
    5. Peter Stone, 2009. "Rationality, Intelligibility, and Interpretation," Rationality and Society, , vol. 21(1), pages 35-58, February.
    6. Jack Vromen, 2013. "Competition as an evolutionary process: Mark Blaug and evolutionary economics," Chapters, in: Marcel Boumans & Matthias Klaes (ed.), Mark Blaug: Rebel with Many Causes, chapter 9, pages 98-124, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    7. Muramatsu, Roberta & Hanoch, Yaniv, 2005. "Emotions as a mechanism for boundedly rational agents: The fast and frugal way," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 201-221, April.
    8. Brennan, Lisa E., 2000. "Redefining economic efficiency using a case study of sugarcane harvest-transport systems. A job for pluralist thinking," 2000 Conference (44th), January 23-25, 2000, Sydney, Australia 123610, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    9. Deepak Lal, 1992. "In Praise of the Classics: The Relevance of Classical Political Economy for Development Policy and Research," UCLA Economics Working Papers 679, UCLA Department of Economics.
    10. Albert Faber & Koen Frenken, 2008. "Models in evolutionary economics and environmental policy: Towards an evolutionary environmental economics," Innovation Studies Utrecht (ISU) working paper series 08-15, Utrecht University, Department of Innovation Studies, revised Apr 2008.
    11. Giovanni Dosi & Luigi Marengo & Alessandro Nuvolari, 2019. "Institutions are neither autistic maximizers nor flocks of birds: self-organization, power and learning in human organizations," Chapters, in: Francesca Gagliardi & David Gindis (ed.), Institutions and Evolution of Capitalism, chapter 13, pages 194-213, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    12. John H Goldthorpe, 2014. "The role of education in intergenerational social mobility: Problems from empirical research in sociology and some theoretical pointers from economics," Rationality and Society, , vol. 26(3), pages 265-289, August.
    13. Thomas J. Miceli & Alanson P. Minkler, 1997. "Preferences, cooperation, and Institutions," Working papers 1997-06, University of Connecticut, Department of Economics.
    14. David.W Versailles, 1999. "Évolution, individualisme et auto-organisation chez Hayek," Cahiers d'Économie Politique, Programme National Persée, vol. 35(1), pages 63-88.
    15. Laurent Thévenot, 1989. "Équilibre et rationalité dans un univers complexe," Revue Économique, Programme National Persée, vol. 40(2), pages 147-198.
    16. Durlauf, S.N., 1997. "Rational Choice and the Study of Science," Working papers 9709r, Wisconsin Madison - Social Systems.
    17. Mayntz, Renate, 2009. "Sozialwissenschaftliches Erklären: Probleme der Theoriebildung und Methodologie," Schriften aus dem Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung Köln, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, volume 63, number 63.
    18. Regina Roth, 2010. "Marx on technical change in the critical edition," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(5), pages 1223-1251.
    19. Josep Rosanas, 2008. "Beyond Economic Criteria: A Humanistic Approach to Organizational Survival," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 78(3), pages 447-462, March.
    20. Cass Sunstein & Richard Zeckhauser, 2011. "Overreaction to Fearsome Risks," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 48(3), pages 435-449, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fan:quaqua:v:html10.3280/qua2013-099007. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Stefania Rosato (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.francoangeli.it/riviste/sommario.aspx?IDRivista=80 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.