IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/worbus/v53y2018i3p303-306.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Contextualizing international business research: Enhancing rigor and relevance

Author

Listed:
  • Teagarden, Mary B.
  • Von Glinow, Mary Ann
  • Mellahi, Kamel

Abstract

Context differentiates international business (IB) from traditional Business research. Along with many IB scholars, we argue that context should be much more adequately emphasized in IB research. Location differences are commonly ignored; complexity and polycomplexity--and other levels of analysis issues--are rarely acknowledged; and the relevance of models and theory developed in Western contexts is not adequately questioned or explored. This paper suggests contextualization guidelines for scholars to enhance the rigor of their research and to make their IB research more relevant for practitioners. In conclusion we suggest solutions for closing rigor and relevance gaps in IB research by enhancing contextualization.

Suggested Citation

  • Teagarden, Mary B. & Von Glinow, Mary Ann & Mellahi, Kamel, 2018. "Contextualizing international business research: Enhancing rigor and relevance," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 53(3), pages 303-306.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:worbus:v:53:y:2018:i:3:p:303-306
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jwb.2017.09.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090951617306557
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jwb.2017.09.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Oded Shenkar & Mary Ann von Glinow, 1994. "Paradoxes of Organizational Theory and Research: Using the Case of China to Illustrate National Contingency," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(1), pages 56-71, January.
    2. Mary Teagarden & Andreas Schotter, 2013. "Favor prevalence in emerging markets: A multi-level analysis," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 447-460, June.
    3. Child, John, 2009. "Context, Comparison, and Methodology in Chinese Management Research," Management and Organization Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 5(1), pages 57-73, March.
    4. Joan Enric Ricart & Michael J Enright & Pankaj Ghemawat & Stuart L Hart & Tarun Khanna, 2004. "New frontiers in international strategy," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 35(3), pages 175-200, May.
    5. Whetten, David A., 2009. "An Examination of the Interface between Context and Theory Applied to the Study of Chinese Organizations," Management and Organization Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 5(1), pages 29-56, March.
    6. Michael-Jörg Oesterle & Joachim Wolf, 2011. "50 Years of Management International Review and IB/IM Research," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 51(6), pages 735-754, December.
    7. Peter J Buckley, 2002. "Is the International Business Research Agenda Running Out of Steam?," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 33(2), pages 365-373, June.
    8. Pankaj Ghemawat, 2003. "Semiglobalization and international business strategy," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 34(2), pages 138-152, March.
    9. Debra L. Shapiro & Mary Ann Von Glinow & Zhixing Xiao, 2007. "Toward Polycontextually Sensitive Research Methods," Management and Organization Review, The International Association for Chinese Management Research, vol. 3(1), pages 129-152, March.
    10. Von Glinow, Mary Ann & Teagarden, Mary B., 2009. "The Future of Chinese Management Research: Rigour and Relevance Redux," Management and Organization Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 5(1), pages 75-89, March.
    11. Shapiro, Debra L. & Glinow, Mary Ann Von & Xiao, Zhixing, 2007. "Toward Polycontextually Sensitive Research Methods," Management and Organization Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 3(1), pages 129-152, March.
    12. David M Gligor & Carol L Esmark & Ismail Gölgeci, 2016. "Building international business theory: A grounded theory approach," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 47(1), pages 93-111, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Khan, Zaheer & Rao-Nicholson, Rekha & Tarba, Shlomo Y., 2018. "Global networks as a mode of balance for exploratory innovations in a late liberalizing economy," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 53(3), pages 392-402.
    2. Schotter, Andreas P.J. & Buchel, Olha & Vashchilko (Lukoianova), Tatiana, 2018. "Interactive visualization for research contextualization in international business," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 53(3), pages 356-372.
    3. Guttormsen, David S.A. & Francesco, Anne Marie & Chapman, Malcolm K., 2018. "Revisiting the expatriate failure concept: A qualitative study of Scandinavian expatriates in Hong Kong," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 117-128.
    4. Brian K. Boyd, 2018. "Paradigm development in Chinese management research: The role of research methodology," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 35(3), pages 805-827, September.
    5. Ferreira, Manuel Portugal & Li, Dan & Guisinger, Stephen & Serra, Fernando A. Ribeiro, 2009. "Será o ambiente internacional de negócios o contexto efetivo para a pesquisa em negócios internacionais?," RAE - Revista de Administração de Empresas, FGV-EAESP Escola de Administração de Empresas de São Paulo (Brazil), vol. 49(3), July.
    6. Yannick Thams & Ying Liu & Mary Glinow, 2013. "Asian favors: More than a cookie cutter approach," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 461-486, June.
    7. Bidault, Francis & de la Torre, José R. & Zanakis, Stelios H. & Ring, Peter Smith, 2018. "Willingness to rely on trust in global business collaborations: Context vs. demography," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 53(3), pages 373-391.
    8. Child, John & Karmowska, Joanna & Shenkar, Oded, 2022. "The role of context in SME internationalization – A review," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 57(1).
    9. Dau, Luis Alfonso, 2018. "Contextualizing international learning: The moderating effects of mode of entry & subsidiary networks on the relationship between reforms & profitability," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 53(3), pages 403-414.
    10. Eranova, Mariya & Prashantham, Shameen, 2016. "Decision making and paradox: Why study China?," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 193-201.
    11. Preuss, Lutz & Vazquez-Brust, Diego & Yakovleva, Natalia & Foroughi, Hamid & Mutti, Diana, 2022. "When social movements close institutional voids: Triggers, processes, and consequences for multinational enterprises," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 57(1).
    12. Chidlow, Agnieszka & Holmström-Lind, Christine & Holm, Ulf & Tallman, Steve, 2015. "Do I stay or do I go? Sub-national drivers for post-entry subsidiary development," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 24(2), pages 266-275.
    13. Pereira, Vijay & Tuffour, James & Patnaik, Swetketu & Temouri, Yama & Malik, Ashish & Singh, Sanjay Kumar, 2021. "The quest for CSR: Mapping responsible and irresponsible practices in an intra-organizational context in Ghana’s gold mining industry," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 268-281.
    14. Muethel, Miriam & Hoegl, Martin, 2012. "The influence of social institutions on managers’ concept of trust: Implications for trust-building in Sino-German relationships," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 47(3), pages 420-434.
    15. Ilgaz Arikan & Oded Shenkar, 2022. "Neglected elements: What we should cover more of in international business research," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 53(7), pages 1484-1507, September.
    16. Zeng, Jing & Khan, Zaheer & De Silva, Muthu, 2019. "The emergence of multi-sided platform MNEs: Internalization theory and networks," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 28(6), pages 1-1.
    17. Sheldon, Peter & Li, Yiqiong, 2013. "Localized poaching and skills shortages of manufacturing employees among MNEs in China," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 48(2), pages 186-195.
    18. Nielsen, Christine & Thangadurai, Mohan, 2007. "Janus and the Delphi Oracle: Entering the new world of international business research," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 13(2), pages 147-163, June.
    19. Michailova, Snejina, 2011. "Contextualizing in International Business research: Why do we need more of it and how can we be better at it?," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 129-139, March.
    20. Aggarwal, Raj & Berrill, Jenny & Hutson, Elaine & Kearney, Colm, 2011. "What is a multinational corporation? Classifying the degree of firm-level multinationality," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 20(5), pages 557-577, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:worbus:v:53:y:2018:i:3:p:303-306. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/620401/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.