IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/wdevel/v171y2023ics0305750x2300178x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Turning poo into profit? The troubled politics of a biogas-based sanitation business model in Mozambique

Author

Listed:
  • Büscher, Chris

Abstract

Business models based on resource recovery and reuse (RRR) are presented by various actors as innovative and promising solutions to sanitation problems in development contexts. This article suggests that these models must be seen instead as a contemporary neoliberal approach to sanitation development, shaped by the RRR ‘waste regime’. Under this regime, (human) waste is not only revalued as a renewable resource rather than disposable dirt, but simultaneously treated as a potential commodity. The idea of poo as a potential resource and profitable commodity has given rise to the main promise of sanitation business models in development: long-term sustainability of sanitation facilities, based on cost-recovery or commercial viability through market-led innovation and entrepreneurship by the poor. I critically examine this promise for a sanitation business model piloted in two towns in Mozambique. This model sought to ‘turn poo into profit’ through the production and commercial use of biogas, extracted out of human and other types of waste using anaerobic digestion. The study, based on interviews and documentary analysis, finds that an exclusionary and contested ‘politics of poo’ underpinned the process of developing this model. The persistent, but increasingly fruitless pursuit of rendering the model commercially viable heavily divided the actors who were closely involved in the process, rendering the pilot contested. Actors who should have been closely involved, i.e. targeted people and the Mozambican public agency responsible for sanitation in the towns, were largely excluded in the process as they were not familiar with, or interested in, the ideas and market discourses specific to sanitation business models. The article concludes that those propagating sanitation business models based on biogas need to come to grips with the likelihood that poo may perhaps not have a golden future in development.

Suggested Citation

  • Büscher, Chris, 2023. "Turning poo into profit? The troubled politics of a biogas-based sanitation business model in Mozambique," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:wdevel:v:171:y:2023:i:c:s0305750x2300178x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2023.106360
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305750X2300178X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.worlddev.2023.106360?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kim Andersson & Sarah Dickin & Arno Rosemarin, 2016. "Towards “Sustainable” Sanitation: Challenges and Opportunities in Urban Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Otoo, Miriam & Drechsel, Pay, 2018. "Resource recovery from waste: business models for energy, nutrient and water reuse in low- and middle-income countries," IWMI Books, International Water Management Institute, number 284165.
    3. Diener, Stefan & Semiyaga, Swaib & Niwagaba, Charles B. & Muspratt, Ashley Murray & Gning, Jean Birane & Mbéguéré, Mbaye & Ennin, Joseph Effah & Zurbrugg, Christian & Strande, Linda, 2014. "A value proposition: Resource recovery from faecal sludge—Can it be the driver for improved sanitation?," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 32-38.
    4. Nicky Gregson & Mike Crang, 2010. "Materiality and Waste: Inorganic Vitality in a Networked World," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 42(5), pages 1026-1032, May.
    5. Patrick Kilby, 2012. "The Changing Development Landscape in the First Decade of the 21st Century and its Implications for Development Studies," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(6), pages 1001-1017.
    6. Susan Engel & Anggun Susilo, 2014. "Shaming and Sanitation in Indonesia: A Return to Colonial Public Health Practices?," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 45(1), pages 157-178, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Denise Silveti & Kim Andersson, 2019. "Challenges of Governing Off-Grid “Productive” Sanitation in Peri-Urban Areas: Comparison of Case Studies in Bolivia and South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-9, June.
    2. Barrington, D.J. & Sridharan, S. & Shields, K.F. & Saunders, S.G. & Souter, R.T. & Bartram, J., 2017. "Sanitation marketing: A systematic review and theoretical critique using the capability approach," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 128-134.
    3. Daniel Ddiba & Kim Andersson & Arno Rosemarin & Helfrid Schulte-Herbrüggen & Sarah Dickin, 2022. "The circular economy potential of urban organic waste streams in low- and middle-income countries," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 1116-1144, January.
    4. Cherunya, Pauline C. & Ahlborg, Helene & Truffer, Bernhard, 2020. "Anchoring innovations in oscillating domestic spaces: Why sanitation service offerings fail in informal settlements," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(1).
    5. Ruth Lane, 2014. "Understanding the Dynamic Character of Value in Recycling Metals from Australia," Resources, MDPI, vol. 3(2), pages 1-16, April.
    6. Post Lori & Issa Tariq & Schmitz Andrew & Oehmke James, 2021. "Enabling the Environment for Private Sector Investment: Impact on Food Security and Poverty," Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization, De Gruyter, vol. 19(1), pages 25-37, May.
    7. Sebastian Ureta, 2016. "Caring for waste: Handling tailings in a Chilean copper mine," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 48(8), pages 1532-1548, August.
    8. Lampel, Linda, 2020. "Value capture and distribution in second-hand clothing trade: The role of charity discourses, commercial strategies and economic and political contexts," ÖFSE-Forum, Austrian Foundation for Development Research (ÖFSE), volume 72, number 72, Juni.
    9. McMichael, Celia & Robinson, Priscilla, 2016. "Drivers of sustained hygiene behaviour change: A case study from mid-western Nepal," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 28-36.
    10. Petru Ștefea & Grațiela Georgiana Noja & Irina-Maria Grecu, 2020. "Financial performance of European companies involved in environmental activities of corporate social responsibility," Journal of Financial Studies, Institute of Financial Studies, vol. 9(5), pages 35-48, November.
    11. Marco Bardus & May A. Massoud, 2022. "Predicting the Intention to Sort Waste at Home in Rural Communities in Lebanon: An Application of the Theory of Planned Behaviour," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-18, July.
    12. Berta Moya & Ruben Sakrabani & Alison Parker, 2019. "Realizing the Circular Economy for Sanitation: Assessing Enabling Conditions and Barriers to the Commercialization of Human Excreta Derived Fertilizer in Haiti and Kenya," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-15, June.
    13. Stefan Nier & Oliver Klein & Christine Tamásy, 2019. "Global Crop Value Chains: Shifts and Challenges in South-North Relations," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-16, March.
    14. Licciardello, F. & Milani, M. & Consoli, S. & Pappalardo, N. & Barbagallo, S. & Cirelli, G., 2018. "Wastewater tertiary treatment options to match reuse standards in agriculture," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 232-242.
    15. Hassen Abda Wako, 2018. "Aid, institutions and economic growth in sub†Saharan Africa: Heterogeneous donors and heterogeneous responses," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(1), pages 23-44, February.
    16. Manzoor Qadir, 2018. "Policy Note: "Addressing Trade-offs to Promote Safely Managed Wastewater in Developing Countries"," Water Economics and Policy (WEP), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 4(02), pages 1-10, April.
    17. Semiyaga, Swaib & Okure, Mackay A.E. & Niwagaba, Charles B. & Katukiza, Alex Y. & Kansiime, Frank, 2015. "Decentralized options for faecal sludge management in urban slum areas of Sub-Saharan Africa: A review of technologies, practices and end-uses," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 104(PA), pages 109-119.
    18. S. M. Mizanur Rahman & Chelsea Schelly & Audrey L. Mayer & Emma S. Norman, 2018. "Uncovering Discursive Framings of the Bangladesh Shipbreaking Industry," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-19, January.
    19. Ismaila Rimi Abubakar, 2017. "Access to Sanitation Facilities among Nigerian Households: Determinants and Sustainability Implications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-17, April.
    20. Gebrezgabher, Solomie & Kodua, T. & Mateo-Sagasta, Javier, 2022. "Cost of water reuse projects in MENA and cost recovery mechanisms," IWMI Books, Reports H051739, International Water Management Institute.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:wdevel:v:171:y:2023:i:c:s0305750x2300178x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/worlddev .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.