IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/trapol/v24y2012icp83-90.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Making better choices: a systematic comparison of adversarial and collaborative approaches to the transport policy process

Author

Listed:
  • Baumann, Christiane
  • White, Stuart

Abstract

This paper investigates the practical and theoretical advantages of collaborative stakeholder (CSD) dialogue over adversarial processes in facilitating better transport policy choices.

Suggested Citation

  • Baumann, Christiane & White, Stuart, 2012. "Making better choices: a systematic comparison of adversarial and collaborative approaches to the transport policy process," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 83-90.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:24:y:2012:i:c:p:83-90
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.06.012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X12001047
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.06.012?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. ., 2005. "Politics and the Pact," Chapters, in: Fiscal Policy in Economic and Monetary Union, chapter 9, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    2. Booth, Chris & Richardson, Tim, 2001. "Placing the public in integrated transport planning," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 8(2), pages 141-149, April.
    3. Dmitry Sorokin, 2005. "On The Russian Economic Political Map of the World," Montenegrin Journal of Economics, Economic Laboratory for Transition Research (ELIT), vol. 1(1), pages 1-37.
    4. Thomas C. Beierle, 1999. "Using Social Goals To Evaluate Public Participation In Environmental Decisions," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 16(3‐4), pages 75-103, September.
    5. Stefan Bratzel, 1999. "Conditions of success in sustainable urban transport policyPolicy change in 'relatively successful' European cities," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(2), pages 177-190, January.
    6. Banister, David, 2008. "The sustainable mobility paradigm," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 15(2), pages 73-80, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Novak, David C. & Koliba, Chris & Zia, Asim & Tucker, Matt, 2015. "Evaluating the outcomes associated with an innovative change in a state-level transportation project prioritization process: A case study of Vermont," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 130-143.
    2. de Luca, Stefano, 2014. "Public engagement in strategic transportation planning: An analytic hierarchy process based approach," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 110-124.
    3. Kehlbacher, Ariane & Stark, Kerstin & Gebhardt, Laura & Jarass, Julia & Schuppan, Julia, 2023. "Comparing municipal progress in implementing temporary cycle lanes during the Covid-19 pandemic," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    4. Bezerra, Barbara Stolte & dos Santos, Ana Laura Lordelo & Delmonico, Diego V.G., 2020. "Unfolding barriers for urban mobility plan in small and medium municipalities – A case study in Brazil," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 808-822.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Canitez, Fatih, 2020. "Transferring sustainable urban mobility policies: An institutional perspective," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 1-12.
    2. Kover Agnes, 2015. "Captured by State and Church: Concerns about Civil Society in Democratic Hungary," Nonprofit Policy Forum, De Gruyter, vol. 6(2), pages 187-212, August.
    3. Dawei Li & Yujia Zhang & Cheng Li, 2019. "Mining Public Opinion on Transportation Systems Based on Social Media Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-15, July.
    4. Costanza, Jennifer Noel, 2016. "Mining Conflict and the Politics of Obtaining a Social License: Insight from Guatemala," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 97-113.
    5. Gil, Artur & Calado, Helena & Bentz, Julia, 2011. "Public participation in municipal transport planning processes – the case of the sustainable mobility plan of Ponta Delgada, Azores, Portugal," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 19(6), pages 1309-1319.
    6. Hausknost, Daniel & Grima, Nelson & Singh, Simron Jit, 2017. "The political dimensions of Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES): Cascade or stairway?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 109-118.
    7. Gössling, Stefan, 2016. "Urban transport justice," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 1-9.
    8. Huber, Amelie & Joshi, Deepa, 2015. "Hydropower, Anti-Politics, and the Opening of New Political Spaces in the Eastern Himalayas," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 13-25.
    9. Marletto, Gerardo & Mameli, Francesca, 2012. "A participative procedure to select indicators of policies for sustainable urban mobility. Outcomes of a national test," MPRA Paper 36433, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Luis A. Guzman & Victor A. Cantillo-Garcia & Julian Arellana & Olga L. Sarmiento, 2023. "User expectations and perceptions towards new public transport infrastructure: evaluating a cable car in Bogotá," Transportation, Springer, vol. 50(3), pages 751-771, June.
    11. Brown, Judy & Tregidga, Helen, 2017. "Re-politicizing social and environmental accounting through Rancière: On the value of dissensus," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 1-21.
    12. de Luca, Stefano, 2014. "Public engagement in strategic transportation planning: An analytic hierarchy process based approach," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 110-124.
    13. Franceschini, Simone & Marletto, Gerardo, 2015. "Assessing the benefits and the shortcomings of participation – findings from a test in Bari (Italy)," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 33-42.
    14. Ferretto, Laura & Bruzzone, Francesco & Nocera, Silvio, 2021. "Pathways to active mobility planning," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    15. Andersson, Elias & Lidestav, Gun, 2016. "Creating alternative spaces and articulating needs: Challenging gendered notions of forestry and forest ownership through women's networks," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 38-44.
    16. Radomíra Jordová & Hana Brůhová-Foltýnová, 2021. "Rise of a New Sustainable Urban Mobility Planning Paradigm in Local Governance: Does the SUMP Make a Difference?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-18, May.
    17. Joutsenvirta, Maria, 2016. "A practice approach to the institutionalization of economic degrowth," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 23-32.
    18. Karin Aggestam, 2015. "Desecuritisation of water and the technocratic turn in peacebuilding," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 327-340, September.
    19. S. Franceschini & G. Marletto, 2014. "A deliberative-participative procedure for sustainable urban mobility – Findings from a test in Bari (Italy)," Working Paper CRENoS 201408, Centre for North South Economic Research, University of Cagliari and Sassari, Sardinia.
    20. Hammond, Jonathan & Lorne, Colin & Coleman, Anna & Allen, Pauline & Mays, Nicholas & Dam, Rinita & Mason, Thomas & Checkland, Kath, 2017. "The spatial politics of place and health policy: Exploring Sustainability and Transformation Plans in the English NHS," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 217-226.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:24:y:2012:i:c:p:83-90. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30473/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.