IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transe/v59y2013icp108-122.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Constraint programming approach to quay crane scheduling problem

Author

Listed:
  • Unsal, Ozgur
  • Oguz, Ceyda

Abstract

This study presents a constraint programming (CP) model for the quay crane scheduling problem (QCSP), which occurs at container terminals, with realistic constraints such as safety margins, travel times and precedence relations. Next, QCSP with time windows and integrated crane assignment and scheduling problem, are discussed. The performance of the CP model is compared with that of algorithms presented in QCSP literature. The results of the computational experiments indicate that the CP model is able to produce good results while reducing the computational time, and is a robust and flexible alternative for different types of crane scheduling problems.

Suggested Citation

  • Unsal, Ozgur & Oguz, Ceyda, 2013. "Constraint programming approach to quay crane scheduling problem," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 108-122.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:59:y:2013:i:c:p:108-122
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2013.08.006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1366554513001543
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tre.2013.08.006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. He, Junliang & Chang, Daofang & Mi, Weijian & Yan, Wei, 2010. "A hybrid parallel genetic algorithm for yard crane scheduling," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 136-155, January.
    2. Bierwirth, Christian & Meisel, Frank, 2010. "A survey of berth allocation and quay crane scheduling problems in container terminals," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(3), pages 615-627, May.
    3. Daganzo, Carlos F., 1989. "The crane scheduling problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 159-175, June.
    4. Kim, Kap Hwan & Park, Young-Man, 2004. "A crane scheduling method for port container terminals," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(3), pages 752-768, August.
    5. Peterkofsky, Roy I. & Daganzo, Carlos F., 1990. "A branch and bound solution method for the crane scheduling problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 24(3), pages 159-172, June.
    6. Frank Meisel & Christian Bierwirth, 2013. "A Framework for Integrated Berth Allocation and Crane Operations Planning in Seaport Container Terminals," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(2), pages 131-147, May.
    7. Irvin J. Lustig & Jean-François Puget, 2001. "Program Does Not Equal Program: Constraint Programming and Its Relationship to Mathematical Programming," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 31(6), pages 29-53, December.
    8. Lee, Der-Horng & Wang, Hui Qiu & Miao, Lixin, 2008. "Quay crane scheduling with non-interference constraints in port container terminals," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 124-135, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vibhuti Dhingra & Debjit Roy & René B. M. Koster, 2017. "A cooperative quay crane-based stochastic model to estimate vessel handling time," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 97-124, March.
    2. Wu, Lingxiao & Ma, Weimin, 2017. "Quay crane scheduling with draft and trim constraints," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 38-68.
    3. Abdellah Salhi & Ghazwan Alsoufi & Xinan Yang, 2019. "An evolutionary approach to a combined mixed integer programming model of seaside operations as arise in container ports," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 272(1), pages 69-98, January.
    4. Shoufeng Ma & Hongming Li & Ning Zhu & Chenyi Fu, 2021. "Stochastic programming approach for unidirectional quay crane scheduling problem with uncertainty," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 137-174, April.
    5. Unsal, Ozgur & Oguz, Ceyda, 2019. "An exact algorithm for integrated planning of operations in dry bulk terminals," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 103-121.
    6. Lashkari, Shabnam & Wu, Yong & Petering, Matthew E.H., 2017. "Sequencing dual-spreader crane operations: Mathematical formulation and heuristic algorithm," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 262(2), pages 521-534.
    7. Gregory A. Kasapidis & Dimitris C. Paraskevopoulos & Panagiotis P. Repoussis & Christos D. Tarantilis, 2021. "Flexible Job Shop Scheduling Problems with Arbitrary Precedence Graphs," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(11), pages 4044-4068, November.
    8. Guvenc Dik & Erhan Kozan, 2017. "A flexible crane scheduling methodology for container terminals," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 64-96, March.
    9. Omar Abou Kasm & Ali Diabat & T. C. E. Cheng, 2020. "The integrated berth allocation, quay crane assignment and scheduling problem: mathematical formulations and a case study," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 291(1), pages 435-461, August.
    10. Damla Kizilay & Deniz Türsel Eliiyi, 2021. "A comprehensive review of quay crane scheduling, yard operations and integrations thereof in container terminals," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 1-42, March.
    11. Noura Al-Dhaheri & Ali Diabat, 2017. "A Lagrangian relaxation-based heuristic for the multi-ship quay crane scheduling problem with ship stability constraints," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 248(1), pages 1-24, January.
    12. Bierwirth, Christian & Meisel, Frank, 2015. "A follow-up survey of berth allocation and quay crane scheduling problems in container terminals," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(3), pages 675-689.
    13. Kong, Lingrui & Ji, Mingjun & Gao, Zhendi, 2022. "An exact algorithm for scheduling tandem quay crane operations in container terminals," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    14. Boysen, Nils & Briskorn, Dirk & Meisel, Frank, 2017. "A generalized classification scheme for crane scheduling with interference," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(1), pages 343-357.
    15. Qin, Tianbao & Du, Yuquan & Chen, Jiang Hang & Sha, Mei, 2020. "Combining mixed integer programming and constraint programming to solve the integrated scheduling problem of container handling operations of a single vessel," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(3), pages 884-901.
    16. Chargui, Kaoutar & Zouadi, Tarik & El Fallahi, Abdellah & Reghioui, Mohamed & Aouam, Tarik, 2021. "Berth and quay crane allocation and scheduling with worker performance variability and yard truck deployment in container terminals," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vibhuti Dhingra & Debjit Roy & René B. M. Koster, 2017. "A cooperative quay crane-based stochastic model to estimate vessel handling time," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 97-124, March.
    2. Abdellah Salhi & Ghazwan Alsoufi & Xinan Yang, 2019. "An evolutionary approach to a combined mixed integer programming model of seaside operations as arise in container ports," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 272(1), pages 69-98, January.
    3. Wu, Lingxiao & Ma, Weimin, 2017. "Quay crane scheduling with draft and trim constraints," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 38-68.
    4. Evrim Ursavas, 2017. "Crane allocation with stability considerations," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 19(2), pages 379-401, June.
    5. Nils Boysen & Malte Fliedner & Florian Jaehn & Erwin Pesch, 2013. "A Survey on Container Processing in Railway Yards," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(3), pages 312-329, August.
    6. Shucheng Yu & Shuaian Wang & Lu Zhen, 2017. "Quay crane scheduling problem with considering tidal impact and fuel consumption," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 29(3), pages 345-368, December.
    7. Shoufeng Ma & Hongming Li & Ning Zhu & Chenyi Fu, 2021. "Stochastic programming approach for unidirectional quay crane scheduling problem with uncertainty," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 137-174, April.
    8. Frank Meisel, 2011. "The quay crane scheduling problem with time windows," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 58(7), pages 619-636, October.
    9. Nabil Nehme & Bacel Maddah & Isam A. Kaysi, 2021. "An integrated multi-ship crane allocation in Beirut Port container terminal," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 1743-1761, September.
    10. Kaveshgar, Narges & Huynh, Nathan, 2015. "Integrated quay crane and yard truck scheduling for unloading inbound containers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 168-177.
    11. Boysen, Nils & Briskorn, Dirk & Meisel, Frank, 2017. "A generalized classification scheme for crane scheduling with interference," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(1), pages 343-357.
    12. Frank Meisel & Christian Bierwirth, 2013. "A Framework for Integrated Berth Allocation and Crane Operations Planning in Seaport Container Terminals," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(2), pages 131-147, May.
    13. Gharehgozli, Amir & Zaerpour, Nima, 2018. "Stacking outbound barge containers in an automated deep-sea terminal," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(3), pages 977-995.
    14. Kong, Lingrui & Ji, Mingjun & Gao, Zhendi, 2022. "An exact algorithm for scheduling tandem quay crane operations in container terminals," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    15. Sun, Defeng & Tang, Lixin & Baldacci, Roberto & Lim, Andrew, 2021. "An exact algorithm for the unidirectional quay crane scheduling problem with vessel stability," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 291(1), pages 271-283.
    16. T. R. Lalita & G. S. R. Murthy, 2022. "Compact ILP formulations for a class of solutions to berth allocation and quay crane scheduling problems," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 59(1), pages 413-439, March.
    17. Damla Kizilay & Deniz Türsel Eliiyi, 2021. "A comprehensive review of quay crane scheduling, yard operations and integrations thereof in container terminals," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 1-42, March.
    18. Yongpei Guan & Kang-Hung Yang & Zhili Zhou, 2013. "The crane scheduling problem: models and solution approaches," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 203(1), pages 119-139, March.
    19. Gharehgozli, Amir Hossein & Vernooij, Floris Gerardus & Zaerpour, Nima, 2017. "A simulation study of the performance of twin automated stacking cranes at a seaport container terminal," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(1), pages 108-128.
    20. Bierwirth, Christian & Meisel, Frank, 2015. "A follow-up survey of berth allocation and quay crane scheduling problems in container terminals," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(3), pages 675-689.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:59:y:2013:i:c:p:108-122. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600244/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.