IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transb/v24y1990i3p159-172.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A branch and bound solution method for the crane scheduling problem

Author

Listed:
  • Peterkofsky, Roy I.
  • Daganzo, Carlos F.

Abstract

Typical cargo ships spend 60% of their time in port, costing their owners about $1000 per hour. In this paper, we attack such costs with a method to speed loading and unloading. We model the need for container handling as generic "work," which cranes can do at a constant rate. Each hold of each ship has a given amount of this work and cranes can interrupt their work on individual holds without any loss of efficiency. In the parlance of scheduling theory, this constitutes an "open shop" with parallel, identical machines, where jobs consist of independent, single-stage, preemptable tasks. Practical problems often involve only a few ships but many holds; the complication of preemptable tasks makes them very complex. The paper presents a branch and bound method which, for this model, minimizes delay costs (weighted tardiness). As part of the method, we extend previous solutions to the feasibility problem of preemptive machine scheduling (to cases where multiple machines can work simultaneously on a single task). Computational results and extensions to more complicated problems are offered. Certain concepts developed here may also be applicable to other problems, both in scheduling and elsewhere. In particular, they may lead to optimal solutions of problems for which feasibility determination methods already exist.

Suggested Citation

  • Peterkofsky, Roy I. & Daganzo, Carlos F., 1990. "A branch and bound solution method for the crane scheduling problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 24(3), pages 159-172, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:24:y:1990:i:3:p:159-172
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0191-2615(90)90014-P
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:24:y:1990:i:3:p:159-172. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/548/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.