IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transb/v125y2019icp248-265.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A hybrid model for crew scheduling in rail rapid transit networks

Author

Listed:
  • Fuentes, Manuel
  • Cadarso, Luis
  • Marín, Ángel

Abstract

Human resources related problems are of vital importance for all the companies. Within the transportation world, they usually represent a very important part of the overall expenses. This paper presents a network-flow based crew scheduling model for rapid transit networks, where distances are not big but service frequency is very high. The crew scheduling problem has been traditionally modeled as a set covering/partitioning problem. Here, the presented approach faces the problem in a different way taking benefit from a linear payment policy and enabling an easier integration with other planning problems such as rolling stock circulations.

Suggested Citation

  • Fuentes, Manuel & Cadarso, Luis & Marín, Ángel, 2019. "A hybrid model for crew scheduling in rail rapid transit networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 248-265.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:125:y:2019:i:c:p:248-265
    DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2019.05.007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191261518303205
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.trb.2019.05.007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Luis Cadarso & Ángel Marín, 2012. "Integration of timetable planning and rolling stock in rapid transit networks," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 199(1), pages 113-135, October.
    2. Silke Jütte & Marc Albers & Ulrich W. Thonemann & Knut Haase, 2011. "Optimizing Railway Crew Scheduling at DB Schenker," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 41(2), pages 109-122, April.
    3. Balaji Gopalakrishnan & Ellis. Johnson, 2005. "Airline Crew Scheduling: State-of-the-Art," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 140(1), pages 305-337, November.
    4. Maenhout, Broos & Vanhoucke, Mario, 2010. "A hybrid scatter search heuristic for personalized crew rostering in the airline industry," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 206(1), pages 155-167, October.
    5. Dennis Huisman & Leo G. Kroon & Ramon M. Lentink & Michiel J. C. M. Vromans, 2005. "Operations Research in passenger railway transportation," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 59(4), pages 467-497, November.
    6. Jütte, Silke & Thonemann, Ulrich W., 2012. "Divide-and-price: A decomposition algorithm for solving large railway crew scheduling problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 219(2), pages 214-223.
    7. Cynthia Barnhart & Ellis L. Johnson & George L. Nemhauser & Martin W. P. Savelsbergh & Pamela H. Vance, 1998. "Branch-and-Price: Column Generation for Solving Huge Integer Programs," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 46(3), pages 316-329, June.
    8. Erwin Abbink & Matteo Fischetti & Leo Kroon & Gerrit Timmer & Michiel Vromans, 2005. "Reinventing Crew Scheduling at Netherlands Railways," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 35(5), pages 393-401, October.
    9. J. P. Arabeyre & J. Fearnley & F. C. Steiger & W. Teather, 1969. "The Airline Crew Scheduling Problem: A Survey," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 3(2), pages 140-163, May.
    10. Issmail Elhallaoui & Daniel Villeneuve & François Soumis & Guy Desaulniers, 2005. "Dynamic Aggregation of Set-Partitioning Constraints in Column Generation," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 53(4), pages 632-645, August.
    11. Jesica Armas & Luis Cadarso & Angel A. Juan & Javier Faulin, 2017. "A multi-start randomized heuristic for real-life crew rostering problems in airlines with work-balancing goals," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 258(2), pages 825-848, November.
    12. Alberto Caprara & Matteo Fischetti & Paolo Toth, 1999. "A Heuristic Method for the Set Covering Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 47(5), pages 730-743, October.
    13. Richard Freling & Ramon Lentink & Albert Wagelmans, 2004. "A Decision Support System for Crew Planning in Passenger Transportation Using a Flexible Branch-and-Price Algorithm," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 127(1), pages 203-222, March.
    14. Dauzère-Pérès, Stéphane & De Almeida, David & Guyon, Olivier & Benhizia, Faten, 2015. "A Lagrangian heuristic framework for a real-life integrated planning problem of railway transportation resources," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 138-150.
    15. Van den Bergh, Jorne & Beliën, Jeroen & De Bruecker, Philippe & Demeulemeester, Erik & De Boeck, Liesje, 2013. "Personnel scheduling: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 226(3), pages 367-385.
    16. Lukas Bach & Twan Dollevoet & Dennis Huisman, 2016. "Integrating Timetabling and Crew Scheduling at a Freight Railway Operator," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(3), pages 878-891, August.
    17. Shen, Yindong & Peng, Kunkun & Chen, Kai & Li, Jingpeng, 2013. "Evolutionary crew scheduling with adaptive chromosomes," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 174-185.
    18. Dillenberger, Christof & Escudero, Laureano F. & Wollensak, Artur & Zhang, Wu, 1994. "On practical resource allocation for production planning and scheduling with period overlapping setups," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 75(2), pages 275-286, June.
    19. Niklas Kohl & Stefan Karisch, 2004. "Airline Crew Rostering: Problem Types, Modeling, and Optimization," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 127(1), pages 223-257, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pei, Mingyang & Lin, Peiqun & Du, Jun & Li, Xiaopeng & Chen, Zhiwei, 2021. "Vehicle dispatching in modular transit networks: A mixed-integer nonlinear programming model," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    2. Neufeld, Janis S. & Scheffler, Martin & Tamke, Felix & Hoffmann, Kirsten & Buscher, Udo, 2021. "An efficient column generation approach for practical railway crew scheduling with attendance rates," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 293(3), pages 1113-1130.
    3. Lingshu Zhong & Mingyang Pei, 2020. "Optimal Design for a Shared Swap Charging System Considering the Electric Vehicle Battery Charging Rate," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-16, March.
    4. Heil, Julia & Hoffmann, Kirsten & Buscher, Udo, 2020. "Railway crew scheduling: Models, methods and applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 283(2), pages 405-425.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Heil, Julia & Hoffmann, Kirsten & Buscher, Udo, 2020. "Railway crew scheduling: Models, methods and applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 283(2), pages 405-425.
    2. Neufeld, Janis S. & Scheffler, Martin & Tamke, Felix & Hoffmann, Kirsten & Buscher, Udo, 2021. "An efficient column generation approach for practical railway crew scheduling with attendance rates," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 293(3), pages 1113-1130.
    3. Thomas Breugem & Twan Dollevoet & Dennis Huisman, 2022. "Is Equality Always Desirable? Analyzing the Trade-Off Between Fairness and Attractiveness in Crew Rostering," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(4), pages 2619-2641, April.
    4. Breugem, T. & Dollevoet, T.A.B. & Huisman, D., 2017. "Is Equality always desirable?," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI2017-30, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    5. Kirsten Hoffmann & Udo Buscher & Janis Sebastian Neufeld & Felix Tamke, 2017. "Solving Practical Railway Crew Scheduling Problems with Attendance Rates," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 59(3), pages 147-159, June.
    6. Lukas Bach & Twan Dollevoet & Dennis Huisman, 2016. "Integrating Timetabling and Crew Scheduling at a Freight Railway Operator," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(3), pages 878-891, August.
    7. Jesica Armas & Luis Cadarso & Angel A. Juan & Javier Faulin, 2017. "A multi-start randomized heuristic for real-life crew rostering problems in airlines with work-balancing goals," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 258(2), pages 825-848, November.
    8. Silke Jütte & Marc Albers & Ulrich W. Thonemann & Knut Haase, 2011. "Optimizing Railway Crew Scheduling at DB Schenker," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 41(2), pages 109-122, April.
    9. Quesnel, Frédéric & Desaulniers, Guy & Soumis, François, 2020. "A branch-and-price heuristic for the crew pairing problem with language constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 283(3), pages 1040-1054.
    10. Van den Bergh, Jorne & Beliën, Jeroen & De Bruecker, Philippe & Demeulemeester, Erik & De Boeck, Liesje, 2013. "Personnel scheduling: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 226(3), pages 367-385.
    11. Atoosa Kasirzadeh & Mohammed Saddoune & François Soumis, 2017. "Airline crew scheduling: models, algorithms, and data sets," EURO Journal on Transportation and Logistics, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 6(2), pages 111-137, June.
    12. Breugem, T. & van Rossum, B.T.C. & Dollevoet, T. & Huisman, D., 2022. "A column generation approach for the integrated crew re-planning problem," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    13. Jütte, Silke & Thonemann, Ulrich W., 2012. "Divide-and-price: A decomposition algorithm for solving large railway crew scheduling problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 219(2), pages 214-223.
    14. Masoud Yaghini & Mohammad Karimi & Mohadeseh Rahbar, 2015. "A set covering approach for multi-depot train driver scheduling," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 29(3), pages 636-654, April.
    15. Lin, Zhiyuan & Kwan, Raymond S.K., 2016. "A branch-and-price approach for solving the train unit scheduling problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 97-120.
    16. Doi, Tsubasa & Nishi, Tatsushi & Voß, Stefan, 2018. "Two-level decomposition-based matheuristic for airline crew rostering problems with fair working time," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(2), pages 428-438.
    17. Abbink, E.J.W., 2008. "Solving large scale crew scheduling problems by using iterative partitioning," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2008-03, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    18. Abbink, E.J.W. & Albino, L. & Dollevoet, T.A.B. & Huisman, D. & Roussado, J. & Saldanha, R.L., 2010. "Solving Large Scale Crew Scheduling Problems in Practice," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2010-63, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    19. Dauzère-Pérès, Stéphane & De Almeida, David & Guyon, Olivier & Benhizia, Faten, 2015. "A Lagrangian heuristic framework for a real-life integrated planning problem of railway transportation resources," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 138-150.
    20. Breugem, T. & Dollevoet, T.A.B. & Huisman, D., 2018. "Analyzing a Family of Formulations for Cyclic Crew Rostering," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI2018-35, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:125:y:2019:i:c:p:248-265. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/548/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.