IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v46y2016icp90-99.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rural development and environmental protection through the use of biofertilizers in agriculture: An alternative for underdeveloped countries?

Author

Listed:
  • Barragán-Ocaña, Alejandro
  • del-Valle-Rivera, María del Carmen

Abstract

Economic momentum of underdeveloped countries derived from the generation and application of their endogenous knowledge is an essential factor toward achieving social welfare. Thus, it is important to understand the development of science and technology within these underdeveloped countries, how the application of that development can address problems in agriculture and food needs, and how that development can offer sustainable options for growth and optimization. In addition, many small farmers in underdeveloped countries are already planting crops based on biotechnological products, which is significant in terms of how these activities influence the development of their lives, particularly with respect to the generation of policies aimed at farming areas. This paper is an exploratory study on the perceptions of peasant producers of the effects of biofertilizers on their environment and their lives. This research is based on a study of peasant producers of the State of Morelos, Mexico, who use biofertilizers produced from endogenous technological assets, i.e., that involve private actors and public research centers. The results facilitate understanding the perceptions of these peasants in addition to the challenges and opportunities that rural areas face and the connections between the involvement of business, academia and government in planning and administration with respect to the management of these innovations.

Suggested Citation

  • Barragán-Ocaña, Alejandro & del-Valle-Rivera, María del Carmen, 2016. "Rural development and environmental protection through the use of biofertilizers in agriculture: An alternative for underdeveloped countries?," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 90-99.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:46:y:2016:i:c:p:90-99
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2016.06.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X1530066X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2016.06.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Du, Yang & Park, Albert & Wang, Sangui, 2005. "Migration and rural poverty in China," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 688-709, December.
    2. Lynn Mytelka, 2000. "Local Systems Of Innovation In A Globalized World Economy," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(1), pages 15-32.
    3. Minh Quang Dao, 2004. "Rural poverty in developing countries: an empirical analysis," Journal of Economic Studies, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 31(6), pages 500-508, October.
    4. Berdegué, Julio A. & Bebbington, Anthony & Escobal, Javier, 2015. "Conceptualizing Spatial Diversity in Latin American Rural Development: Structures, Institutions, and Coalitions," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 1-10.
    5. Marra, Michele & Pannell, David J. & Abadi Ghadim, Amir, 2003. "The economics of risk, uncertainty and learning in the adoption of new agricultural technologies: where are we on the learning curve?," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 75(2-3), pages 215-234.
    6. Mario Cimoli & Sebastián Rovira, 2008. "Elites and Structural Inertia in Latin America: An Introductory Note on the Political Economy of Development," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(2), pages 327-347, June.
    7. Xavier Irz & Lin Lin & Colin Thirtle & Steve Wiggins, 2001. "Agricultural Productivity Growth and Poverty Alleviation," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 19(4), pages 449-466, December.
    8. McMillan, G. Steven & Narin, Francis & Deeds, David L., 2000. "An analysis of the critical role of public science in innovation: the case of biotechnology," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 1-8, January.
    9. Jean-Paul Chavas, 2008. "On the economics of agricultural production ," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 52(4), pages 365-380, December.
    10. Aguilar-Gallegos, Norman & Muñoz-Rodríguez, Manrrubio & Santoyo-Cortés, Horacio & Aguilar-Ávila, Jorge & Klerkx, Laurens, 2015. "Information networks that generate economic value: A study on clusters of adopters of new or improved technologies and practices among oil palm growers in Mexico," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 122-132.
    11. Huang, Jikun & Hu, Ruifa & Pray, Carl & Qiao, Fangbin & Rozelle, Scott, 2003. "Biotechnology as an alternative to chemical pesticides: a case study of Bt cotton in China," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 29(1), pages 55-67, July.
    12. Casas, Rosalba & de Gortari, Rebeca & Santos, Ma. Josefa, 2000. "The building of knowledge spaces in Mexico: a regional approach to networking," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 225-241, February.
    13. Minh Quang Dao, 2009. "Poverty, income distribution, and agriculture in developing countries," Journal of Economic Studies, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 36(2), pages 168-183, May.
    14. Francisco Sagasti, 2004. "Knowledge and Innovation for Development," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 3306.
    15. Arocena, Rodrigo & Göransson, Bo & Sutz, Judith, 2015. "Knowledge policies and universities in developing countries: Inclusive development and the “developmental university”," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 10-20.
    16. Geoff Mulgan, 2006. "The Process of Social Innovation," Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, MIT Press, vol. 1(2), pages 145-162, April.
    17. Aldrich, Lorna M. & Blisard, Noel, 1998. "Consumer Acceptance of Biotechnology: Lessons From the rbST Experience," Agricultural Information Bulletins 33663, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    18. Anthony Arundel, 2003. "Biotechnology Indicators and Public Policy," OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers 2003/5, OECD Publishing.
    19. Daniel A. Sumner & Julian M. Alston & Joseph W. Glauber, 2010. "Evolution of the Economics of Agricultural Policy," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 92(2), pages 403-423.
    20. Caroline Ashley & Simon Maxwell, 2001. "Rethinking Rural Development," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 19(4), pages 395-425, December.
    21. van Wijk, Jeroen & Cohen, Joel I. & Komen, John, 1993. "Intellectual Property Rights for Agricultural Biotechnology: Options and Implications for Developing Countries," ISNAR Archive 310753, CGIAR > International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    22. Rodríguez-Pose, Andrés & Hardy, Daniel, 2015. "Addressing poverty and inequality in the rural economy from a global perspective," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 63257, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    23. Berdegué, Julio A. & Escobal, Javier & Bebbington, Anthony, 2015. "Explaining Spatial Diversity in Latin American Rural Development: Structures, Institutions, and Coalitions," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 129-137.
    24. de Janvry, Alain & Sadoulet, Elisabeth, 2000. "Rural poverty in Latin America: Determinants and exit paths," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 25(4), pages 389-409, August.
    25. Padilla-Pérez, Ramón & Gaudin, Yannick, 2014. "Science, technology and innovation policies in small and developing economies: The case of Central America," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(4), pages 749-759.
    26. Mario Cimoli & Jorge Katz, 2003. "Structural reforms, technological gaps and economic development: a Latin American perspective," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 12(2), pages 387-411, April.
    27. Frank T. Rothaermel & David L. Deeds, 2004. "Exploration and exploitation alliances in biotechnology: a system of new product development," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(3), pages 201-221, March.
    28. Dohse, Dirk, 2000. "Technology policy and the regions -- the case of the BioRegio contest," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(9), pages 1111-1133, December.
    29. Naylor, Rosamond L. & Falcon, Walter P. & Goodman, Robert M. & Jahn, Molly M. & Sengooba, Theresa & Tefera, Hailu & Nelson, Rebecca J., 2004. "Biotechnology in the developing world: a case for increased investments in orphan crops," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 15-44, February.
    30. Woolcock, Michael & Narayan, Deepa, 2000. "Social Capital: Implications for Development Theory, Research, and Policy," The World Bank Research Observer, World Bank, vol. 15(2), pages 225-249, August.
    31. Dodgson, Mark & Mathews, John & Kastelle, Tim & Hu, Mei-Chih, 2008. "The evolving nature of Taiwan's national innovation system: The case of biotechnology innovation networks," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 430-445, April.
    32. Casas, Rosalba, 2006. "Between traditions and modernity: Technological strategies at three tequila firms," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 407-419.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rios, Ana R. & Masters, William A. & Shively, Gerald E., 2008. "Linkages between Market Participation and Productivity: Results from a Multi-Country Farm Household Sample," 2008 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2008, Orlando, Florida 6145, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    2. Vanhaverbeke, Wim & Li, Ying & Van de Vrande, Vareska, 2009. "The dual role of external corporate venturing in technological exploration," MPRA Paper 26488, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2010.
    3. Rodrigues De Freitas, Rodrigo & Simão Seixas, Cristiana & Regina Da Cal Seixas, Sônia, 2020. "Understanding the past to plan for the future: The small-scale fisheries at Ilha Grande Bay, Brazil," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 20(C).
    4. Xinhui Wu & Luan Chen & Li Ma & Liru Cai & Xun Li, 2023. "Return migration, rural household investment decision, and poverty alleviation: Evidence from rural Guangdong, China," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(1), pages 304-325, March.
    5. Diao, Xinshen & Magalhaes, Eduardo & Silver, Jed, 2019. "Cities and rural transformation: A spatial analysis of rural livelihoods in Ghana," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 141-157.
    6. Juan Xu & Mengsheng Yang & Ziliang Lu & Dan Liu & Yan Wu, 2021. "Quality Analysis on Spatial Planning Pattern of Rural Area in Southern Shaanxi, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-22, November.
    7. Micheels, Eric T. & Nolan, James F., 2016. "Examining the effects of absorptive capacity and social capital on the adoption of agricultural innovations: A Canadian Prairie case study," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 127-138.
    8. Ospina Peralta, Pablo & Hollenstein, Patric, 2015. "Territorial Coalitions and Rural Dynamics in Ecuador. Why History Matters," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 85-95.
    9. Haslam, Paul Alexander, 2021. "The micro-politics of corporate responsibility: How companies shape protest in communities affected by mining," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    10. Ridier, Aude & Chaib, Karim & Roussy, Caroline, 2012. "The adoption of innovative cropping systems under price and production risks: a dynamic model of crop rotation choice," Working Papers 207985, Institut National de la recherche Agronomique (INRA), Departement Sciences Sociales, Agriculture et Alimentation, Espace et Environnement (SAE2).
    11. Anh Thu Quang Pham & Pundarik Mukhopadhaya, 2022. "Multidimensionl Poverty and The Role of Social Capital in Poverty Alleviation Among Ethnic Groups in Rural Vietnam: A Multilevel Analysis," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 159(1), pages 281-317, January.
    12. Mark Lehrer, 2007. "Organizing knowledge spillovers when basic and applied research are interdependent: German biotechnology policy in historical perspective," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 277-296, June.
    13. Etayankara Muralidharan & Saurav Pathak, 2019. "Consequences of Cultural Leadership Styles for Social Entrepreneurship: A Theoretical Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-19, February.
    14. Angelo Kenneth S. Romasanta & Peter Sijde & Jacqueline Muijlwijk-Koezen, 2020. "Innovation in pharmaceutical R&D: mapping the research landscape," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 125(3), pages 1801-1832, December.
    15. Lehrer, Mark & Asakawa, Kazuhiro, 2004. "Rethinking the public sector: idiosyncrasies of biotechnology commercialization as motors of national R&D reform in Germany and Japan," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(6-7), pages 921-938, September.
    16. Marije Schaafsma & Ilda Dreoni & Lacour Mody Ayompe & Benis Egoh & Dewa Putu Ekayana & Arilson Favareto & Sonny Mumbunan & Louise Nakagawa & Jonas Ngouhouo‐poufoun & Marieke Sassen & Thiago Kanashiro , 2023. "A framework to understand the social impacts of agricultural trade," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(1), pages 138-150, February.
    17. Berdegué, Julio A. & Soloaga, Isidro, 2018. "Small and medium cities and development of Mexican rural areas," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 277-288.
    18. Anthony Bebbington & Elisa Arond & Juan Luis Dammert, 2016. "Scalar politics and transnational governance innovations: A political settlements lens on the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative in the Andes," Global Development Institute Working Paper Series esid-066-16, GDI, The University of Manchester.
    19. Anthony Bebbington & Abdul-Gafaru Abdulai & Marja Hinfelaar & Denise Humphreys Bebbington & Cynthia Sanborn, 2017. "Political settlements and the governance of extractive industry: A comparative analysis of the longue duree in Africa and Latin America," Global Development Institute Working Paper Series esid-081-17, GDI, The University of Manchester.
    20. Timmer, C. Peter, 2008. "Agriculture and Pro-Poor Growth: An Asian Perspective," Asian Journal of Agriculture and Development, Southeast Asian Regional Center for Graduate Study and Research in Agriculture (SEARCA), vol. 5(1), pages 1-29, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:46:y:2016:i:c:p:90-99. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.