IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/stapro/v55y2001i1p1-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Likelihood estimation after nonparametric transformation

Author

Listed:
  • Cheung, Ying-Kuen
  • Fine, Jason P.

Abstract

We propose a two-step likelihood estimation procedure for the coefficients in a semiparametric transformation model. A simple nonparametric estimator for the unknown transformation is substituted into the likelihood. The resulting maximiser is shown to be consistent and asymptotically normal. Numerical studies indicate that the estimator may be as precise as an efficient semiparametric procedure.

Suggested Citation

  • Cheung, Ying-Kuen & Fine, Jason P., 2001. "Likelihood estimation after nonparametric transformation," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 55(1), pages 1-7, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:55:y:2001:i:1:p:1-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167-7152(01)00106-7
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gorgens, Tue & Horowitz, Joel L., 1999. "Semiparametric estimation of a censored regression model with an unknown transformation of the dependent variable," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 90(2), pages 155-191, June.
    2. Horowitz, Joel L, 1996. "Semiparametric Estimation of a Regression Model with an Unknown Transformation of the Dependent Variable," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 64(1), pages 103-137, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. M. C. Jones, 2015. "On Families of Distributions with Shape Parameters," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 83(2), pages 175-192, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sokbae Lee, 2006. "Identification of a competing risks model with unknown transformations of latent failure times," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 93(4), pages 996-1002, December.
    2. Chiappori, Pierre-Andre & Komunjer, Ivana, 2008. "Correct Specification and Identification of Nonparametric Transformation Models," University of California at San Diego, Economics Working Paper Series qt4v12m2rg, Department of Economics, UC San Diego.
    3. Bonev, Petyo, 2020. "Nonparametric identification in nonseparable duration models with unobserved heterogeneity," Economics Working Paper Series 2005, University of St. Gallen, School of Economics and Political Science.
    4. Yao Luo & Isabelle Perrigne & Quang Vuong, 2018. "Structural Analysis of Nonlinear Pricing," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 126(6), pages 2523-2568.
    5. Gorgens, Tue & Horowitz, Joel L., 1999. "Semiparametric estimation of a censored regression model with an unknown transformation of the dependent variable," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 90(2), pages 155-191, June.
    6. Krief, Jerome M., 2017. "Direct instrumental nonparametric estimation of inverse regression functions," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 201(1), pages 95-107.
    7. Gorgens, T., 1999. "Semiparametric Estimation of Single-Index Transition Intensities," Papers 99-25, Carleton - School of Public Administration.
    8. Khan, Shakeeb, 2001. "Two-stage rank estimation of quantile index models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 100(2), pages 319-355, February.
    9. Irene Botosaru & Chris Muris, 2017. "Binarization for panel models with fixed effects," CeMMAP working papers 31/17, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    10. Wang, Tao & Xu, Pei-Rong & Zhu, Li-Xing, 2012. "Non-convex penalized estimation in high-dimensional models with single-index structure," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 221-235.
    11. Coppejans, Mark, 2001. "Estimation of the binary response model using a mixture of distributions estimator (MOD)," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 102(2), pages 231-269, June.
    12. Hausman, Jerry A. & Woutersen, Tiemen, 2014. "Estimating a semi-parametric duration model without specifying heterogeneity," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 178(P1), pages 114-131.
    13. Vanhems, Anne & Van Keilegom, Ingrid, 2011. "Semiparametric transformation model with endogeneity: a control function approach," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2011011, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    14. Alois Stutzer & Rafael Lalive, 2004. "The Role of Social Work Norms in Job Searching and Subjective Well-Being," Journal of the European Economic Association, MIT Press, vol. 2(4), pages 696-719, June.
    15. Vanhems, Anne & Van Keilegom, Ingrid, 2019. "Estimation Of A Semiparametric Transformation Model In The Presence Of Endogeneity," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 35(1), pages 73-110, February.
    16. Chiappori, Pierre-André & Komunjer, Ivana & Kristensen, Dennis, 2015. "Nonparametric identification and estimation of transformation models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 188(1), pages 22-39.
    17. Hsieh Fushing, 2012. "Semiparametric efficient inferences for lifetime regression model with time-dependent covariates," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 64(1), pages 1-25, February.
    18. Tan, Xin Lu, 2019. "Optimal estimation of slope vector in high-dimensional linear transformation models," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 179-204.
    19. Frédérique Fève & Jean-Pierre Florens, 2010. "The practice of non-parametric estimation by solving inverse problems: the example of transformation models," Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 13(3), pages 1-27, October.
    20. Irene Botosaru & Chris Muris & Krishna Pendakur, 2020. "Intertemporal Collective Household Models: Identification in Short Panels with Unobserved Heterogeneity in Resource Shares," Department of Economics Working Papers 2020-09, McMaster University.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:55:y:2001:i:1:p:1-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622892/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.