IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v64y2007i12p2417-2426.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Maternal and child health problems: The inter-generational consequences of early maternal aggression and withdrawal

Author

Listed:
  • De Genna, Natacha Marie
  • Stack, Dale M.
  • Serbin, Lisa A.
  • Ledingham, Jane
  • Schwartzman, Alex E.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of childhood aggression and social withdrawal on adult health, and to examine the transfer of health-risk to offspring. Previous studies have linked aggression to poor health habits, whereas social withdrawal has been linked to increased symptom reporting. Little research has attempted to examine the effects of parents' childhood behaviour problems on health in the next generation. Seventy-four parents from disadvantaged neighbourhoods in Montreal (roughly half of whom were identified in childhood as being highly aggressive and/or withdrawn) and their offspring aged 9-11-years old participated in this prospective, longitudinal study. Health histories of mothers and target children were taken during structured home interviews. Regression analyses tested the relationship between parents' behaviour problems in childhood and subsequent health outcomes in both generations. Mothers who were high on both aggression and withdrawal in childhood showed the earliest signs of health problems. Maternal childhood aggression predicted lower self-rated health and some current health problems, whereas maternal childhood withdrawal predicted more somatizing symptoms such as frequent headaches. Offspring of socially withdrawn mothers or fathers were more likely to be prescribed medication for respiratory problems and Ritalin, despite no matching maternal reports of higher incidence of behavior or respiratory problems. In summary, there were distinct health patterns for families of individuals who are highly aggressive and socially withdrawn in childhood, with implications for transfer of poor health habits to the next generation.

Suggested Citation

  • De Genna, Natacha Marie & Stack, Dale M. & Serbin, Lisa A. & Ledingham, Jane & Schwartzman, Alex E., 2007. "Maternal and child health problems: The inter-generational consequences of early maternal aggression and withdrawal," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 64(12), pages 2417-2426, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:64:y:2007:i:12:p:2417-2426
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(07)00114-1
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pine, D.S. & Cohen, P. & Brook, J. & Coplan, J.D., 1997. "Psychiatric symptoms in adolescence as predictors of obesity in early adulthood: A longitudinal study," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 87(8), pages 1303-1310.
    2. Hongyi Li & Lixin Colin Xu & Heng‐fu Zou, 2000. "Corruption, Income Distribution, and Growth," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(2), pages 155-182, July.
    3. anonymous, 2000. "Slower growth shows through to income and spending," Western economic developments, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, issue Dec, pages 1-1.
    4. Henri L.F de Groot, 2000. "Growth, Unemployment and Deindustrialization," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 1946.
    5. DOCQUIER, Frédéric & PADDISON, Oliver, 2000. "Growth and equality effects of pension plans," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 2000036, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Blackburn, Keith & Forgues-Puccio, Gonzalo F., 2009. "Why is corruption less harmful in some countries than in others?," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 72(3), pages 797-810, December.
    2. Antonio Andres & Carlyn Ramlogan-Dobson, 2011. "Is Corruption Really Bad for Inequality? Evidence from Latin America," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(7), pages 959-976.
    3. Knack, Steve & Xu, Lixin Colin, 2017. "Unbundling institutions for external finance: Worldwide firm-level evidence," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 215-232.
    4. Petra Koudelkova & Wadim Strielkowski & Denisa Hejlova, 2015. "Corruption and System Change in the Czech Republic: Firm-level Evidence," DANUBE: Law and Economics Review, European Association Comenius - EACO, issue 1, pages 25-46, March.
    5. Mohamed Dridi, 2014. "Corruption and Education: Empirical Evidence," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 4(3), pages 476-493.
    6. Kouadio, Hugues Kouassi & Gakpa, Lewis-Landry, 2022. "Do economic growth and institutional quality reduce poverty and inequality in West Africa?," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 41-63.
    7. You, Jong-Sung & Khagram, Sanjeev, 2004. "Inequality and Corruption," Working Paper Series rwp04-001, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
    8. Keith Blackburn & Rashmi Sarmah, 2006. "Red Tape, Corruption and Finance," Economics Discussion Paper Series 0639, Economics, The University of Manchester.
    9. Ishita Chatterjee & Ranjan Ray, 2009. "Crime, Corruption and Institutions," Monash Economics Working Papers 20-09, Monash University, Department of Economics.
    10. Mark Gradstein & Branko Milanovic, 2004. "Does Libertè = Egalité? A Survey of the Empirical Links between Democracy and Inequality with Some Evidence on the Transition Economies," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(4), pages 515-537, September.
    11. Leo H. Chan, 2006. "A Note On The Correlation Relationship Among Singapore, Hong Kong And The Us Capital Markets Since The Hong Kong Handover: Implication For International Portfolio Management," The Singapore Economic Review (SER), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 51(03), pages 335-342.
    12. Henri L.F. de Groot & Jacques Poot & Martijn J. Smit, 2007. "Agglomeration, Innovation and Regional Development: Theoretical Perspectives and Meta-Analysis," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 07-079/3, Tinbergen Institute.
    13. Putu Anom Mahadwartha, 2010. "States Of Nature And Indicators Of Manager’S Corruption In Indonesia," Global Journal of Business Research, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 4(3), pages 25-45.
    14. Cai, Weixing & Hu, Feng & Xu, Fangming & Zheng, Liyi, 2022. "Anti-corruption campaign and corporate cash holdings: Evidence from China," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 51(PA).
    15. Mohammed TOUITOU & Ahmed BOUDEGHDEGH, 2021. "Estimating the relationship between governance, economic growth, inequality and poverty," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania - AGER, vol. 0(3(628), A), pages 115-128, Autumn.
    16. Keith Blackburn & Niloy Bose & M. Emranul Haque, 2011. "Public Expenditures, Bureaucratic Corruption And Economic Development," Manchester School, University of Manchester, vol. 79(3), pages 405-428, June.
    17. Bienvenido Ortega & Antonio Casquero & Jesús Sanjuán, 2016. "Corruption and Convergence in Human Development: Evidence from 69 Countries During 1990–2012," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 127(2), pages 691-719, June.
    18. Zelda Okatch & Abu Siddique & Anu Rammohan, 2013. "Determinants of Income Inequality in Botswana," Economics Discussion / Working Papers 13-15, The University of Western Australia, Department of Economics.
    19. Nadia Fiorino & Emma Galli & Ilaria Petrarca, 2012. "Corruption and Growth: Evidence from the Italian Regions," European Journal of Government and Economics, Europa Grande, vol. 1(2), pages 126-144, December.
    20. Foellmi, Reto & Oechslin, Manuel, 2007. "Who gains from non-collusive corruption?," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 82(1), pages 95-119, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:64:y:2007:i:12:p:2417-2426. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.