IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v27y1988i6p637-644.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Meta-analysis of satisfaction with medical care: Description of research domain and analysis of overall satisfaction levels

Author

Listed:
  • Hall, Judith A.
  • Dornan, Michael C.

Abstract

Consumer satisfaction with medical care was examined in a meta-analysis of 221 studies. For each study, (1) a coding form was filled out that described sample characteristics, design, and instrument methodology, and (2) the study sample's overall satisfaction level was transformed to a 0.00-1.00 scale. This article summarizes the study attributes as compiled from the coding form, presents grand satisfaction means over all studies, and tests for differences in satisfaction between studies that employed different methods of research.

Suggested Citation

  • Hall, Judith A. & Dornan, Michael C., 1988. "Meta-analysis of satisfaction with medical care: Description of research domain and analysis of overall satisfaction levels," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 27(6), pages 637-644, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:27:y:1988:i:6:p:637-644
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(88)90012-3
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Katarzyna Krot & Iga Rudawska, 2021. "How Public Trust in Health Care Can Shape Patient Overconsumption in Health Systems? The Missing Links," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-15, April.
    2. Nicoloro-SantaBarbara, Jennifer & Rosenthal, Lisa & Auerbach, Melissa V. & Kocis, Christina & Busso, Cheyanne & Lobel, Marci, 2017. "Patient-provider communication, maternal anxiety, and self-care in pregnancy," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 133-140.
    3. Hekkert, Karin Dorieke & Cihangir, Sezgin & Kleefstra, Sophia Martine & van den Berg, Bernard & Kool, Rudolf Bertijn, 2009. "Patient satisfaction revisited: A multilevel approach," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 68-75, July.
    4. Prof. Dr. Klaus Bendel & Prof. Dr. Wenzel Matiaske & Prof. Dr. Florian Schramm, 2000. "'Kundenzufriedenheit' bei ambulanten Pflegedienstleistern. Bestandsaufnahme und Vorschläge für ein stresstheoretisch fundiertes Messinstrument," Report 003, Werkstatt für Organisations- und Personalforschung.
    5. de Ruyter, Ko & Wetzels, Martin, 1998. "On the complex nature of patient evaluations of general practice service," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 19(5), pages 565-590, October.
    6. Li, L. X. & Benton, W. C., 1996. "Performance measurement criteria in health care organizations: Review and future research directions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 93(3), pages 449-468, September.
    7. Timothy Calton & Anna Cheetham & Karen D'Silva & Cristine Glazebrook, 2009. "International Schizophrenia Research and the Concept of Patient-Centredness: an Analysis Over Two Decades," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 55(2), pages 157-169, March.
    8. Sun, Shiwei & Zhang, Jin & Zhu, Yiwei & Jiang, Mian & Chen, Shuhui, 2022. "Exploring users' willingness to disclose personal information in online healthcare communities: The role of satisfaction," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    9. Rajkumar Giridhari Singh, 2012. "Customers’ Satisfaction on the Hospitals Services: A Comparison," Indian Journal of Commerce and Management Studies, Educational Research Multimedia & Publications,India, vol. 3(3), pages 37-43, September.
    10. Margrit Löbner & Janine Stein & Melanie Luppa & Alexander Konnopka & Hans Jörg Meisel & Lutz Günther & Jürgen Meixensberger & Katarina Stengler & Matthias C Angermeyer & Hans-Helmut König & Steffi G R, 2017. "Choosing the right rehabilitation setting after herniated disc surgery: Motives, motivations and expectations from the patients’ perspective," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(8), pages 1-20, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:27:y:1988:i:6:p:637-644. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.