IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v53y2016icp1377-1388.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cut your grass and eat it too– Is aviation biofuel production and grazing in the Australian tropics possible?

Author

Listed:
  • Herr, Alexander
  • Braid, Andrew
  • Carter, John
  • McIvor, John
  • Murphy, Helen T
  • O’Connell, Deborah
  • Raisbeck-Brown, Nat
  • Poole, Michael

Abstract

The aviation industry is vulnerable to fuel price rises and carbon emission penalties. The use of bio-jet fuel will reduce emissions. However, there is only limited capacity for aviation fuel production in Australia. In a developing bio-jet fuel industry, it is not known whether there is sufficient biomass available at a reasonable price to support an industry. The literature identifies grasses as having good potential as a cost effective feedstock based on high productivity in tropical and subtropical cattle grazing areas, where there is limited competition with high value crops. Here we present an approach for assessing the biomass potential of grazing lands and apply it to a case study region in Australia. Biomass modelling showed grass biomass production in excess of grazing needs in favourable years of 1Mt within an area of 2500km2. This exceeds the demand of medium to large scale biofuel production facilities. The location of high production areas is variable over years but there are several consistent ‘hotspots’ of biomass production. However, in low rainfall years there is insufficient biomass produced to supply a bioenergy facility. The seasonal rainfall pattern in the area also requires storage of material for several months as harvesting in the wet season is undesirable. Cost for production of baled grass biomass (not including nutrient replacement and profits) to farm gate ranges from AU$50–$110/t. The opportunity cost for diverting grass from beef production to biomass for bioenergy is around AU$50/t. However, grass production for bioenergy would provide enterprise diversification options and environmental management benefits through reducing grazing impacts during the wet season in favour of dry season biomass harvest. The work highlights a potential for co-existence between biomass harvested for bioenergy and grazing systems, but more detailed research is required on environmental impacts and socio-economic considerations before considering implementation.

Suggested Citation

  • Herr, Alexander & Braid, Andrew & Carter, John & McIvor, John & Murphy, Helen T & O’Connell, Deborah & Raisbeck-Brown, Nat & Poole, Michael, 2016. "Cut your grass and eat it too– Is aviation biofuel production and grazing in the Australian tropics possible?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 1377-1388.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:53:y:2016:i:c:p:1377-1388
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.09.052
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032115010229
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2015.09.052?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Puri, Munish & Abraham, Reinu E. & Barrow, Colin J., 2012. "Biofuel production: Prospects, challenges and feedstock in Australia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(8), pages 6022-6031.
    2. Kandulu, John M. & Bryan, Brett A. & King, Darran & Connor, Jeffery D., 2012. "Mitigating economic risk from climate variability in rain-fed agriculture through enterprise mix diversification," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 105-112.
    3. Murphy, Helen T. & O’Connell, Deborah A. & Raison, R. John & Warden, Andrew C. & Booth, Trevor H. & Herr, Alexander & Braid, Andrew L. & Crawford, Debbie F. & Hayward, Jennifer A. & Jovanovic, Tom & M, 2015. "Biomass production for sustainable aviation fuels: A regional case study in Queensland," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 738-750.
    4. Bhende, M. J. & Venkataram, J. V., 1994. "Impact of diversification on household income and risk: A whole-farm modelling approach," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 44(3), pages 301-312.
    5. Monforti, F. & Lugato, E. & Motola, V. & Bodis, K. & Scarlat, N. & Dallemand, J.-F., 2015. "Optimal energy use of agricultural crop residues preserving soil organic carbon stocks in Europe," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 519-529.
    6. Andrew Lang & Heinz Kopetz & Albert Parker, 2012. "Biomass energy holds big promise," Nature, Nature, vol. 488(7413), pages 590-591, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Renzaho, Andre M.N. & Kamara, Joseph K. & Toole, Michael, 2017. "Biofuel production and its impact on food security in low and middle income countries: Implications for the post-2015 sustainable development goals," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 503-516.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kandulu, John M., 2013. "Quantifying the extent to which enterprise mix diversification can mitigate economic risk in rainfed agriculture," Australasian Agribusiness Review, University of Melbourne, Department of Agriculture and Food Systems, vol. 21, pages 1-14.
    2. Zhang, Chi & Hui, Xin & Lin, Yuzhen & Sung, Chih-Jen, 2016. "Recent development in studies of alternative jet fuel combustion: Progress, challenges, and opportunities," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 120-138.
    3. Gil, J.M. & Diaz-Montenegro, J. & Varela, E., 2018. "A Bias-Adjusted Three-Step approach for analysing the livelihood strategies and the asset mix of cacao producers in Ecuador," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277215, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    4. Zeynep Clulow & Michele Ferguson & Peta Ashworth & David Reiner, 2021. "Political ideology and public views of the energy transition in Australia and the UK," Working Papers EPRG2106, Energy Policy Research Group, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge.
    5. Coderoni, Silvia & Pagliacci, Francesco, 2023. "The impact of climate change on land productivity. A micro-level assessment for Italian farms," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    6. Soha, Tamás & Papp, Luca & Csontos, Csaba & Munkácsy, Béla, 2021. "The importance of high crop residue demand on biogas plant site selection, scaling and feedstock allocation – A regional scale concept in a Hungarian study area," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    7. Lenzen, Manfred & McBain, Bonnie & Trainer, Ted & Jütte, Silke & Rey-Lescure, Olivier & Huang, Jing, 2016. "Simulating low-carbon electricity supply for Australia," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 553-564.
    8. John Vourdoubas, 2021. "Is the De-carbonization of Air-transportation to and from the Island of Crete, Greece Feasible?," Environmental Management and Sustainable Development, Macrothink Institute, vol. 10(3), pages 62-75, August.
    9. Kumar, Praveen & Srivastava, Vimal Chandra & Jha, Mithilesh Kumar, 2016. "Jatropha curcas phytotomy and applications: Development as a potential biofuel plant through biotechnological advancements," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 818-838.
    10. Nanda, Sonil & Azargohar, Ramin & Dalai, Ajay K. & Kozinski, Janusz A., 2015. "An assessment on the sustainability of lignocellulosic biomass for biorefining," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 925-941.
    11. Ru Fang, Yan & Zhang, Silu & Zhou, Ziqiao & Shi, Wenjun & Hui Xie, Guang, 2022. "Sustainable development in China: Valuation of bioenergy potential and CO2 reduction from crop straw," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 322(C).
    12. Zhou, Li & Turvey, Calum G., 2014. "Climate change, adaptation and China's grain production," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 72-89.
    13. Burov, Nikita O. & Savelenko, Vsevolod D. & Ershov, Mikhail A. & Vikhritskaya, Anastasia O. & Tikhomirova, Ekaterina O. & Klimov, Nikita A. & Kapustin, Vladimir M. & Chernysheva, Elena A. & Sereda, Al, 2023. "Knowledge contribution from science to technology in the conceptualization model to produce sustainable aviation fuels from lignocellulosic biomass," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    14. Azad, A.K. & Rasul, M.G. & Khan, M.M.K. & Sharma, Subhash C. & Mofijur, M. & Bhuiya, M.M.K., 2016. "Prospects, feedstocks and challenges of biodiesel production from beauty leaf oil and castor oil: A nonedible oil sources in Australia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 302-318.
    15. repec:fpr:export:1340 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Pannell, David J. & Nordblom, Thomas L., 1998. "Impacts of risk aversion on whole-farm management in Syria," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 42(3), pages 1-21.
    17. Mattias, Gaglio & Elena, Tamburini & Giuseppe, Castaldelli & Anna, Fano Elisa, 2021. "Modeling the ecosystem service of agricultural residues provision for bioenergy production: A potential application in the Emilia-Romagna region (Italy)," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 451(C).
    18. Thompson, Wyatt & Lu, Yaqiong & Gerlt, Scott & Yang, Xianyu & Campbell, J. Elliott & Kueppers, Lara M. & Snyder, Mark A., 2018. "Automatic Responses of Crop Stocks and Policies Buffer Climate Change Effects on Crop Markets and Price Volatility," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 98-105.
    19. Gojiya, Anil & Deb, Dipankar & Iyer, Kannan K.R., 2019. "Feasibility study of power generation from agricultural residue in comparison with soil incorporation of residue," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 416-425.
    20. Holmatov, B. & Schyns, J.F. & Krol, M.S. & Gerbens-Leenes, P.W. & Hoekstra, A.Y., 2021. "Can crop residues provide fuel for future transport? Limited global residue bioethanol potentials and large associated land, water and carbon footprints," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    21. Linda Mezule & Ieva Berzina & Martins Strods, 2019. "The Impact of Substrate–Enzyme Proportion for Efficient Hydrolysis of Hay," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-8, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:53:y:2016:i:c:p:1377-1388. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.