IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v149y2021ics1364032121006183.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A systemic view of potential environmental impacts of ocean energy production

Author

Listed:
  • Martínez, M.L.
  • Vázquez, G.
  • Pérez-Maqueo, O.
  • Silva, R.
  • Moreno-Casasola, P.
  • Mendoza-González, G.
  • López-Portillo, J.
  • MacGregor-Fors, I.
  • Heckel, G.
  • Hernández-Santana, J.R.
  • García-Franco, J.G.
  • Castillo-Campos, G.
  • Lara-Domínguez, A.L.

Abstract

Renewable ocean energy is an alternative that will help reduce carbon emissions into the atmosphere. However, there is uncertainty about potential environmental impacts of the technologies involved, because these are new and untested, and methods for the evaluation and monitoring of environmental impacts are scarce. We performed a systematic literature review (well-structured and organized, always looking for the same terms), followed by a systemic analysis in which we considered the interactions between environmental stressors, effects, receptors, and their responses. We found that most studies are theoretical revisions and modelling exercises, although field and laboratory experiments and observations are beginning to accumulate. Environmental stressors are features in the environment (energy-harvesting devices) that modify the natural dynamics of the system. The effects are the changes in the environment induced by the stressors; the most frequently acknowledged and measured are noise, collision, habitat change, hydro-sedimentary dynamics and wave modifications. The receptors of these changes are marine fauna, such as mammals, fish, sea birds, and benthic communities, as well as the shoreline. Their corresponding responses include behaviour, injuries/death, biodiversity loss, alterations in food webs and shoreline change. Once the different components of the environmental impacts are identified, it is important to develop monitoring and mitigation strategies to prevent, or minimize, environmental damage. Ocean energy is a promising option to reduce CO2 emissions into the atmosphere, but the implementation of adequate monitoring and mitigation technologies requires multidisciplinary efforts to obtain effectively clean, renewable energy and to maintain healthy and functional ecosystems.

Suggested Citation

  • Martínez, M.L. & Vázquez, G. & Pérez-Maqueo, O. & Silva, R. & Moreno-Casasola, P. & Mendoza-González, G. & López-Portillo, J. & MacGregor-Fors, I. & Heckel, G. & Hernández-Santana, J.R. & García-Franc, 2021. "A systemic view of potential environmental impacts of ocean energy production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:149:y:2021:i:c:s1364032121006183
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111332
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032121006183
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111332?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aria, Massimo & Cuccurullo, Corrado, 2017. "bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 11(4), pages 959-975.
    2. Hammar, Linus & Gullström, Martin & Dahlgren, Thomas G. & Asplund, Maria E. & Goncalves, Ines Braga & Molander, Sverker, 2017. "Introducing ocean energy industries to a busy marine environment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 178-185.
    3. James A. Callow & Maureen E. Callow, 2011. "Trends in the development of environmentally friendly fouling-resistant marine coatings," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 2(1), pages 1-10, September.
    4. Pine, Matthew K. & Schmitt, Pál & Culloch, Ross M. & Lieber, Lilian & Kregting, Louise T., 2019. "Providing ecological context to anthropogenic subsea noise: Assessing listening space reductions of marine mammals from tidal energy devices," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 49-57.
    5. Dolman, Sarah & Simmonds, Mark, 2010. "Towards best environmental practice for cetacean conservation in developing Scotland's marine renewable energy," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 1021-1027, September.
    6. Waggitt, J.J & Scott, B.E, 2014. "Using a spatial overlap approach to estimate the risk of collisions between deep diving seabirds and tidal stream turbines: A review of potential methods and approaches," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 90-97.
    7. Saidur, R. & Rahim, N.A. & Islam, M.R. & Solangi, K.H., 2011. "Environmental impact of wind energy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(5), pages 2423-2430, June.
    8. Shields, Mark A. & Dillon, Lora Jane & Woolf, David K. & Ford, Alex T., 2009. "Strategic priorities for assessing ecological impacts of marine renewable energy devices in the Pentland Firth (Scotland, UK)," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 635-642, July.
    9. Laws, Nicholas D. & Epps, Brenden P., 2016. "Hydrokinetic energy conversion: Technology, research, and outlook," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 1245-1259.
    10. Pelc, Robin & Fujita, Rod M., 2002. "Renewable energy from the ocean," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 26(6), pages 471-479, November.
    11. Panwar, N.L. & Kaushik, S.C. & Kothari, Surendra, 2011. "Role of renewable energy sources in environmental protection: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(3), pages 1513-1524, April.
    12. Abbasi, S. A. & Abbasi, Naseema, 2000. "The likely adverse environmental impacts of renewable energy sources," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 65(1-4), pages 121-144, April.
    13. D. R. Bellwood & T. P. Hughes & C. Folke & M. Nyström, 2004. "Confronting the coral reef crisis," Nature, Nature, vol. 429(6994), pages 827-833, June.
    14. Tiron, Roxana & Mallon, Fionn & Dias, Frédéric & Reynaud, Emmanuel G., 2015. "The challenging life of wave energy devices at sea: A few points to consider," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 1263-1272.
    15. Lim, Yun Seng & Koh, Siong Lee, 2010. "Analytical assessments on the potential of harnessing tidal currents for electricity generation in Malaysia," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 1024-1032.
    16. Neill, Simon P. & Jordan, James R. & Couch, Scott J., 2012. "Impact of tidal energy converter (TEC) arrays on the dynamics of headland sand banks," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 387-397.
    17. Mendoza, Edgar & Lithgow, Debora & Flores, Pamela & Felix, Angélica & Simas, Teresa & Silva, Rodolfo, 2019. "A framework to evaluate the environmental impact of OCEAN energy devices," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 440-449.
    18. Lees, Kirsty J. & Guerin, Andrew J. & Masden, Elizabeth A., 2016. "Using kernel density estimation to explore habitat use by seabirds at a marine renewable wave energy test facility," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 35-44.
    19. Fujita, Rod & Markham, Alexander C. & Diaz Diaz, Julio E. & Rosa Martinez Garcia, Julia & Scarborough, Courtney & Greenfield, Patrick & Black, Peter & Aguilera, Stacy E., 2012. "Revisiting ocean thermal energy conversion," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 463-465.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Juan F. Bárcenas Graniel & Jassiel V. H. Fontes & Hector F. Gomez Garcia & Rodolfo Silva, 2021. "Assessing Hydrokinetic Energy in the Mexican Caribbean: A Case Study in the Cozumel Channel," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-23, July.
    2. Chen, Yun & Liu, Yanjun & Liu, Weimin & Ge, Yunzheng & Xue, Yifan & Zhang, Li, 2022. "Optimal design of radial inflow turbine for ocean thermal energy conversion based on the installation angle of nozzle blade," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 857-870.
    3. Liu, Yanjun & Xue, Yifan & Chen, Yun & Liu, Weimin & Ge, Yunzheng & Zhang, Li, 2022. "Identification of nonparametric thermodynamic model and optimization of ocean thermal energy conversion radial inflow turbine," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 321(C).
    4. Etzaguery Marin-Coria & Rodolfo Silva & Cecilia Enriquez & M. Luisa Martínez & Edgar Mendoza, 2021. "Environmental Assessment of the Impacts and Benefits of a Salinity Gradient Energy Pilot Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-24, June.
    5. Jessica Guadalupe Tobal-Cupul & Erika Paola Garduño-Ruiz & Emiliano Gorr-Pozzi & Jorge Olmedo-González & Emily Diane Martínez & Andrés Rosales & Dulce Daniela Navarro-Moreno & Jonathan Emmanuel Beníte, 2022. "An Assessment of the Financial Feasibility of an OTEC Ecopark: A Case Study at Cozumel Island," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-28, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tabassum-Abbasi, & Premalatha, M. & Abbasi, Tasneem & Abbasi, S.A., 2014. "Wind energy: Increasing deployment, rising environmental concerns," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 270-288.
    2. Bonar, Paul A.J. & Bryden, Ian G. & Borthwick, Alistair G.L., 2015. "Social and ecological impacts of marine energy development," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 486-495.
    3. Fontaine, A.A. & Straka, W.A. & Meyer, R.S. & Jonson, M.L. & Young, S.D. & Neary, V.S., 2020. "Performance and wake flow characterization of a 1:8.7-scale reference USDOE MHKF1 hydrokinetic turbine to establish a verification and validation test database," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 451-467.
    4. Choupin, O. & Pinheiro Andutta, F. & Etemad-Shahidi, A. & Tomlinson, R., 2021. "A decision-making process for wave energy converter and location pairing," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    5. Sebestyén, Viktor, 2021. "Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews: Environmental impact networks of renewable energy power plants," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    6. Galparsoro, I. & Korta, M. & Subirana, I. & Borja, Á. & Menchaca, I. & Solaun, O. & Muxika, I. & Iglesias, G. & Bald, J., 2021. "A new framework and tool for ecological risk assessment of wave energy converters projects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    7. Zarzuelo, Carmen & López-Ruiz, Alejandro & Ortega-Sánchez, Miguel, 2018. "Impact of human interventions on tidal stream power: The case of Cádiz Bay," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 88-104.
    8. Arias-Gaviria, Jessica & Osorio, Andres F. & Arango-Aramburo, Santiago, 2020. "Estimating the practical potential for deep ocean water extraction in the Caribbean," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 307-319.
    9. Martin-Short, R. & Hill, J. & Kramer, S.C. & Avdis, A. & Allison, P.A. & Piggott, M.D., 2015. "Tidal resource extraction in the Pentland Firth, UK: Potential impacts on flow regime and sediment transport in the Inner Sound of Stroma," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 596-607.
    10. Fairley, I. & Masters, I. & Karunarathna, H., 2015. "The cumulative impact of tidal stream turbine arrays on sediment transport in the Pentland Firth," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 755-769.
    11. Moravec, David & Barták, Vojtěch & Puš, Vladimír & Wild, Jan, 2018. "Wind turbine impact on near-ground air temperature," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 627-633.
    12. Waggitt, J.J & Scott, B.E, 2014. "Using a spatial overlap approach to estimate the risk of collisions between deep diving seabirds and tidal stream turbines: A review of potential methods and approaches," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 90-97.
    13. Segura, E. & Morales, R. & Somolinos, J.A., 2018. "A strategic analysis of tidal current energy conversion systems in the European Union," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 527-551.
    14. Roche, R.C. & Walker-Springett, K. & Robins, P.E. & Jones, J. & Veneruso, G. & Whitton, T.A. & Piano, M. & Ward, S.L. & Duce, C.E. & Waggitt, J.J. & Walker-Springett, G.R. & Neill, S.P. & Lewis, M.J. , 2016. "Research priorities for assessing potential impacts of emerging marine renewable energy technologies: Insights from developments in Wales (UK)," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 1327-1341.
    15. Yah, Nor F. & Oumer, Ahmed N. & Idris, Mat S., 2017. "Small scale hydro-power as a source of renewable energy in Malaysia: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 228-239.
    16. Joshua Sunday Riti & Deyong Song & Yang Shu & Miriam Kamah & Agya Adi Atabani, 2018. "Does renewable energy ensure environmental quality in favour of economic growth? Empirical evidence from China’s renewable development," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(5), pages 2007-2030, September.
    17. Menegaki, Angeliki N. & Tsagarakis, Konstantinos P., 2015. "Rich enough to go renewable, but too early to leave fossil energy?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 1465-1477.
    18. Ya-Tsune Sie & Pierre-Alexandre Château & Yang-Chi Chang & Shiau-Yun Lu, 2018. "Stakeholders Opinions on Multi-Use Deep Water Offshore Platform in Hsiao-Liu-Chiu, Taiwan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-13, February.
    19. Tunde Aderinto & Hua Li, 2018. "Ocean Wave Energy Converters: Status and Challenges," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-26, May.
    20. José Carlos Araújo Amarante & Cássio da Nóbrega Besarria & Helson Gomes de Souza & Otoniel Rodrigues dos Anjos Junior, 2021. "The relationship between economic growth, renewable and nonrenewable energy use and CO2 emissions: empirical evidences for Brazil," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 11(3), pages 411-431, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:149:y:2021:i:c:s1364032121006183. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.