IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v197y2022icp810-827.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Implementation of a generalized actuator disk model into WRF v4.3: A validation study for a real-scale wind turbine

Author

Listed:
  • Kale, Baris
  • Buckingham, Sophia
  • van Beeck, Jeroen
  • Cuerva-Tejero, Alvaro

Abstract

A validation study is carried out for a generalized actuator disk model (GAD) implemented into the Weather Research and Forecasting model, an open-source numerical weather prediction code, in order to simulate the aerodynamic behavior of a real-scale wind turbine under varying atmospheric conditions. Multiple large-eddy simulations (LESs) are performed to resolve energy-containing eddies of turbulent motions utilizing the GAD model, which calculates the wind turbine-induced forces distributed over the rotor disk. The benchmarks defined at the Scaled Wind Technology Facility (SWiFT) campaign, (for details see Doubrawa et al., 2020), were chosen to validate the performance of the GAD model in terms of its capability to reproduce the wake and aerodynamic loading on the rotor. Meteorological data are available from a 60 m meteorological tower located 65 m upstream of the wind turbine, and the aerodynamic data, including scans of downstream velocity profiles, are available for the Vestas V27 wind turbine thanks to DTU’s nacelle-mounted, rear-facing SpinnerLidar (Mikkelsen et al., 2013). Rotor performance and wake recovery results obtained from the GAD model are compared with field experiments and other LES data.

Suggested Citation

  • Kale, Baris & Buckingham, Sophia & van Beeck, Jeroen & Cuerva-Tejero, Alvaro, 2022. "Implementation of a generalized actuator disk model into WRF v4.3: A validation study for a real-scale wind turbine," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 810-827.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:197:y:2022:i:c:p:810-827
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2022.07.119
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148122011429
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2022.07.119?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wu, Yu-Ting & Porté-Agel, Fernando, 2015. "Modeling turbine wakes and power losses within a wind farm using LES: An application to the Horns Rev offshore wind farm," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 945-955.
    2. Mahdi Abkar & Jens Nørkær Sørensen & Fernando Porté-Agel, 2018. "An Analytical Model for the Effect of Vertical Wind Veer on Wind Turbine Wakes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-10, July.
    3. Umberto Ciri & Giovandomenico Petrolo & Maria Vittoria Salvetti & Stefano Leonardi, 2017. "Large-Eddy Simulations of Two In-Line Turbines in a Wind Tunnel with Different Inflow Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-23, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kale, Baris & Buckingham, Sophia & van Beeck, Jeroen & Cuerva-Tejero, Alvaro, 2023. "Comparison of the wake characteristics and aerodynamic response of a wind turbine under varying atmospheric conditions using WRF-LES-GAD and WRF-LES-GAL wind turbine models," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jiufa Cao & Weijun Zhu & Xinbo Wu & Tongguang Wang & Haoran Xu, 2018. "An Aero-acoustic Noise Distribution Prediction Methodology for Offshore Wind Farms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-16, December.
    2. Cao, Lichao & Ge, Mingwei & Gao, Xiaoxia & Du, Bowen & Li, Baoliang & Huang, Zhi & Liu, Yongqian, 2022. "Wind farm layout optimization to minimize the wake induced turbulence effect on wind turbines," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 323(C).
    3. Ti, Zilong & Deng, Xiao Wei & Yang, Hongxing, 2020. "Wake modeling of wind turbines using machine learning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    4. Zilong, Ti & Xiao Wei, Deng, 2022. "Layout optimization of offshore wind farm considering spatially inhomogeneous wave loads," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 306(PA).
    5. Shih-Chieh Liao & Shih-Chieh Chang & Tsung-Chi Cheng, 2021. "Managing the Volatility Risk of Renewable Energy: Index Insurance for Offshore Wind Farms in Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-27, August.
    6. Deskos, Georgios & Laizet, Sylvain & Piggott, Matthew D., 2019. "Turbulence-resolving simulations of wind turbine wakes," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 989-1002.
    7. Ti, Zilong & Deng, Xiao Wei & Zhang, Mingming, 2021. "Artificial Neural Networks based wake model for power prediction of wind farm," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 618-631.
    8. Dou, Bingzheng & Qu, Timing & Lei, Liping & Zeng, Pan, 2020. "Optimization of wind turbine yaw angles in a wind farm using a three-dimensional yawed wake model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    9. Yang, Shanghui & Deng, Xiaowei & Ti, Zilong & Yan, Bowen & Yang, Qingshan, 2022. "Cooperative yaw control of wind farm using a double-layer machine learning framework," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 519-537.
    10. Hegazy, Amr & Blondel, Frédéric & Cathelain, Marie & Aubrun, Sandrine, 2022. "LiDAR and SCADA data processing for interacting wind turbine wakes with comparison to analytical wake models," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 457-471.
    11. Zhang, Jincheng & Zhao, Xiaowei, 2020. "Quantification of parameter uncertainty in wind farm wake modeling," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    12. Pawar, Suraj & Sharma, Ashesh & Vijayakumar, Ganesh & Bay, Chrstopher J. & Yellapantula, Shashank & San, Omer, 2022. "Towards multi-fidelity deep learning of wind turbine wakes," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 867-879.
    13. Jagdeep Singh & Jahrul M Alam, 2023. "Large-Eddy Simulation of Utility-Scale Wind Farm Sited over Complex Terrain," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-26, August.
    14. Mou Lin & Fernando Porté-Agel, 2023. "Power Production and Blade Fatigue of a Wind Turbine Array Subjected to Active Yaw Control," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-17, March.
    15. Andrés Guggeri & Martín Draper, 2019. "Large Eddy Simulation of an Onshore Wind Farm with the Actuator Line Model Including Wind Turbine’s Control below and above Rated Wind Speed," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-21, September.
    16. Dara Vahidi & Fernando Porté-Agel, 2022. "A New Streamwise Scaling for Wind Turbine Wake Modeling in the Atmospheric Boundary Layer," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-18, December.
    17. De Cillis, Giovanni & Cherubini, Stefania & Semeraro, Onofrio & Leonardi, Stefano & De Palma, Pietro, 2022. "Stability and optimal forcing analysis of a wind turbine wake: Comparison with POD," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 765-785.
    18. Ka Ling Wu & Fernando Porté-Agel, 2017. "Flow Adjustment Inside and Around Large Finite-Size Wind Farms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-23, December.
    19. Zhang, Jincheng & Zhao, Xiaowei, 2020. "A novel dynamic wind farm wake model based on deep learning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    20. Michael F. Howland & John O. Dabiri, 2020. "Influence of Wake Model Superposition and Secondary Steering on Model-Based Wake Steering Control with SCADA Data Assimilation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-20, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:197:y:2022:i:c:p:810-827. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.