IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v194y2022icp734-745.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Three-stage model-based evaluation of a downdraft biomass gasifier

Author

Listed:
  • Ghorbani, Saba
  • Atashkari, Kazem
  • Borji, Mehdi

Abstract

Biomass gasification suggests several advantages toward clean environment and energy sustainability. Multi-stage gasifiers enhance the process efficiency and syngas quality. Thus, multi-stage model developments are essential to take into account separate chemical schemes for successive pyrolysis and partial oxidation reactors. The current study is contributed to develop and evaluate a conceptual three-stage biomass gasifier model. The model is built by integrating three successive sub-models for drying and pyrolysis, partial oxidation and char reduction reactors. Pyrolysis sub-model is based on kinetic rate modelling with considering biomass lingo-cellulosic structure. Partial oxidation sub-model is developed by applying axis-symmetric 2D transport equations accompanied by appropriate chemical scheme. Char reduction sub-model is extended based on axis-symmetric 2D DPM model as well as appropriate chemical kinetic scheme. Accuracy of each sub-model and also the whole three-stage gasifier model are separately verified against available experimental data. Verification analysis demonstrates high resolution agreement between the results of the developed model and available experimental data. Simulations ascertain that gasification of 24.8 kg. hr−1 hardwood with about 26.5% moisture content in presence of 7 kg. hr−1 steam and 25 kg. hr−1 air has produced syngas with the composition of 1.92% CH4, 34.02% H2, 16.77% CO, 14.63% CO2 and 32.66% N2, outlet tar concentration of 2.3439 gr. N m−3 and grate char particles concentration of 0.0397 kg. m−3.

Suggested Citation

  • Ghorbani, Saba & Atashkari, Kazem & Borji, Mehdi, 2022. "Three-stage model-based evaluation of a downdraft biomass gasifier," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 734-745.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:194:y:2022:i:c:p:734-745
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2022.05.149
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148122008060
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2022.05.149?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Henriksen, Ulrik & Ahrenfeldt, Jesper & Jensen, Torben Kvist & Gøbel, Benny & Bentzen, Jens Dall & Hindsgaul, Claus & Sørensen, Lasse Holst, 2006. "The design, construction and operation of a 75kW two-stage gasifier," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(10), pages 1542-1553.
    2. Sharma, Abhishek & Pareek, Vishnu & Zhang, Dongke, 2015. "Biomass pyrolysis—A review of modelling, process parameters and catalytic studies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 1081-1096.
    3. Ruiz, J.A. & Juárez, M.C. & Morales, M.P. & Muñoz, P. & Mendívil, M.A., 2013. "Biomass gasification for electricity generation: Review of current technology barriers," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 18(C), pages 174-183.
    4. Yepes Maya, Diego Mauricio & Silva Lora, Electo Eduardo & Andrade, Rubenildo Vieira & Ratner, Albert & Martínez Angel, Juan Daniel, 2021. "Biomass gasification using mixtures of air, saturated steam, and oxygen in a two-stage downdraft gasifier. Assessment using a CFD modeling approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 1014-1030.
    5. Roy, Prokash C. & Datta, Amitava & Chakraborty, Niladri, 2010. "Assessment of cow dung as a supplementary fuel in a downdraft biomass gasifier," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 379-386.
    6. Ratnadhariya, J.K. & Channiwala, S.A., 2009. "Three zone equilibrium and kinetic free modeling of biomass gasifier – a novel approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 1050-1058.
    7. Masmoudi, Mohamed Ali & Sahraoui, Melik & Grioui, Najla & Halouani, Kamel, 2014. "2-D Modeling of thermo-kinetics coupled with heat and mass transfer in the reduction zone of a fixed bed downdraft biomass gasifier," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 288-298.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fugang Zhu & Laihong Shen & Pengcheng Xu & Haoran Yuan & Ming Hu & Jingwei Qi & Yong Chen, 2022. "Numerical Simulation of an Improved Updraft Biomass Gasifier Based on Aspen Plus," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-11, December.
    2. Savelii Kukharets & Gennadii Golub & Marek Wrobel & Olena Sukmaniuk & Krzysztof Mudryk & Taras Hutsol & Algirdas Jasinskas & Marcin Jewiarz & Jonas Cesna & Iryna Horetska, 2022. "A Theoretical Model of the Gasification Rate of Biomass and Its Experimental Confirmation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-15, October.
    3. Marco Mancini & Andreas Schwabauer, 2023. "On the Thermal Stability of a Counter-Current Fixed-Bed Gasifier," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-36, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ud Din, Zia & Zainal, Z.A., 2016. "Biomass integrated gasification–SOFC systems: Technology overview," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 1356-1376.
    2. Samiran, Nor Afzanizam & Jaafar, Mohammad Nazri Mohd & Ng, Jo-Han & Lam, Su Shiung & Chong, Cheng Tung, 2016. "Progress in biomass gasification technique – With focus on Malaysian palm biomass for syngas production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 1047-1062.
    3. Yepes Maya, Diego Mauricio & Silva Lora, Electo Eduardo & Andrade, Rubenildo Vieira & Ratner, Albert & Martínez Angel, Juan Daniel, 2021. "Biomass gasification using mixtures of air, saturated steam, and oxygen in a two-stage downdraft gasifier. Assessment using a CFD modeling approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 1014-1030.
    4. Kang, Shimin & Fu, Jinxia & Zhang, Gang, 2018. "From lignocellulosic biomass to levulinic acid: A review on acid-catalyzed hydrolysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 340-362.
    5. Elsner, Witold & Wysocki, Marian & Niegodajew, Paweł & Borecki, Roman, 2017. "Experimental and economic study of small-scale CHP installation equipped with downdraft gasifier and internal combustion engine," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 213-227.
    6. Safarian, Sahar & Unnþórsson, Rúnar & Richter, Christiaan, 2019. "A review of biomass gasification modelling," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 378-391.
    7. Zeng, Xi & Wang, Fang & Li, Hongling & Wang, Yin & Dong, Li & Yu, Jian & Xu, Guangwen, 2014. "Pilot verification of a low-tar two-stage coal gasification process with a fluidized bed pyrolyzer and fixed bed gasifier," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 9-16.
    8. Pulla Rose Havilah & Amit Kumar Sharma & Gopalakrishnan Govindasamy & Leonidas Matsakas & Alok Patel, 2022. "Biomass Gasification in Downdraft Gasifiers: A Technical Review on Production, Up-Gradation and Application of Synthesis Gas," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-19, May.
    9. Vera, David & Jurado, Francisco & Carpio, José & Kamel, Salah, 2018. "Biomass gasification coupled to an EFGT-ORC combined system to maximize the electrical energy generation: A case applied to the olive oil industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 41-53.
    10. Kaczor, Zuzanna & Buliński, Zbigniew & Werle, Sebastian, 2020. "Modelling approaches to waste biomass pyrolysis: a review," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 427-443.
    11. Huda, A.S.N. & Mekhilef, S. & Ahsan, A., 2014. "Biomass energy in Bangladesh: Current status and prospects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 504-517.
    12. Damartzis, T. & Zabaniotou, A., 2011. "Thermochemical conversion of biomass to second generation biofuels through integrated process design--A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 366-378, January.
    13. Giulio Allesina & Simone Pedrazzi, 2021. "Barriers to Success: A Technical Review on the Limits and Possible Future Roles of Small Scale Gasifiers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-23, October.
    14. Gassner, Martin & Maréchal, François, 2009. "Thermodynamic comparison of the FICFB and Viking gasification concepts," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(10), pages 1744-1753.
    15. Setyawan, M. Ismail Bagus & Dafiqurrohman, Hafif & Akbar, Maha Hidayatullah & Surjosatyo, Adi, 2021. "Characterizing a two-stage downdraft biomass gasifier using a representative particle model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 750-767.
    16. Taghizadeh-Alisaraei, Ahmad & Assar, Hossein Alizadeh & Ghobadian, Barat & Motevali, Ali, 2017. "Potential of biofuel production from pistachio waste in Iran," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 510-522.
    17. Qin, Fanzhi & Zhang, Chen & Zeng, Guangming & Huang, Danlian & Tan, Xiaofei & Duan, Abing, 2022. "Lignocellulosic biomass carbonization for biochar production and characterization of biochar reactivity," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    18. Sangare, Diakaridia & Bostyn, Stéphane & Moscosa-Santillan, Mario & Gökalp, Iskender, 2021. "Hydrodynamics, heat transfer and kinetics reaction of CFD modeling of a batch stirred reactor under hydrothermal carbonization conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    19. Sérgio Ferreira & Eliseu Monteiro & Luís Calado & Valter Silva & Paulo Brito & Cândida Vilarinho, 2019. "Experimental and Modeling Analysis of Brewers´ Spent Grains Gasification in a Downdraft Reactor," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-18, November.
    20. Tabet, F. & Gökalp, I., 2015. "Review on CFD based models for co-firing coal and biomass," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 1101-1114.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:194:y:2022:i:c:p:734-745. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.