IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v178y2021icp830-844.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Correction methods for shadow-band diffuse irradiance measurements: assessing the impact of local adaptation

Author

Listed:
  • Rodríguez-Muñoz, J.M.
  • Monetta, A.
  • Alonso-Suárez, R.
  • Bove, I.
  • Abal, G.

Abstract

Shadow-bands are a low cost alternative when a precision solar tracker is not available. Adequate precision may be achieved if the measured diffuse irradiance is corrected to account for the sky portion blocked by the shadow-band. The isotropic sky assumption leads to a systematic under estimation of diffuse irradiance. Several correction methods have been proposed to take into account the anisotropic effects. However, their performance at a given site depends on the dominant local climate. In this work, it is shown that the local adaptation of shadow band correction methods results in a significant improvement in the diffuse irradiance measurement's accuracy. Nine well-known correction methods are implemented and tested (both in their original and locally adapted versions) for the Pampa Húmeda region of southeastern South America. In absence of local adaptation, only one of the pre-existing methods improves the simple isotropic model. All locally adapted versions perform similarly well and outperform significantly the original methods. A new model based on the parametrization of Battle's model is proposed. It provides the best performance compared to all locally adapted pre-existing models, under all-sky and discriminated sky conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Rodríguez-Muñoz, J.M. & Monetta, A. & Alonso-Suárez, R. & Bove, I. & Abal, G., 2021. "Correction methods for shadow-band diffuse irradiance measurements: assessing the impact of local adaptation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 830-844.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:178:y:2021:i:c:p:830-844
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2021.06.102
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096014812100968X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2021.06.102?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vartiainen, Eero, 1999. "An anisotropic shadow ring correction method for the horizontal diffuse irradiance measurements," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 17(3), pages 311-317.
    2. Gueymard, Christian A., 2014. "A review of validation methodologies and statistical performance indicators for modeled solar radiation data: Towards a better bankability of solar projects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 1024-1034.
    3. Ridley, Barbara & Boland, John & Lauret, Philippe, 2010. "Modelling of diffuse solar fraction with multiple predictors," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 478-483.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Starke, Allan R. & Lemos, Leonardo F.L. & Barni, Cristian M. & Machado, Rubinei D. & Cardemil, José M. & Boland, John & Colle, Sergio, 2021. "Assessing one-minute diffuse fraction models based on worldwide climate features," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 700-714.
    2. Starke, Allan R. & Lemos, Leonardo F.L. & Boland, John & Cardemil, José M. & Colle, Sergio, 2018. "Resolution of the cloud enhancement problem for one-minute diffuse radiation prediction," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 472-484.
    3. Manni, Mattia & Jouttijärvi, Sami & Ranta, Samuli & Miettunen, Kati & Lobaccaro, Gabriele, 2024. "Validation of model chains for global tilted irradiance on East-West vertical bifacial photovoltaics at high latitudes," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    4. Every, Jeremy P. & Li, Li & Dorrell, David G., 2020. "Köppen-Geiger climate classification adjustment of the BRL diffuse irradiation model for Australian locations," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(P1), pages 2453-2469.
    5. Huang, Kuo-Tsang, 2020. "Identifying a suitable hourly solar diffuse fraction model to generate the typical meteorological year for building energy simulation application," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 1102-1115.
    6. Bertrand, Cédric & Vanderveken, Gilles & Journée, Michel, 2015. "Evaluation of decomposition models of various complexity to estimate the direct solar irradiance over Belgium," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 618-626.
    7. Schinke-Nendza, A. & von Loeper, F. & Osinski, P. & Schaumann, P. & Schmidt, V. & Weber, C., 2021. "Probabilistic forecasting of photovoltaic power supply — A hybrid approach using D-vine copulas to model spatial dependencies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 304(C).
    8. Abhnil Amtesh Prasad & Merlinde Kay, 2020. "Assessment of Simulated Solar Irradiance on Days of High Intermittency Using WRF-Solar," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-22, January.
    9. Copper, J.K. & Sproul, A.B., 2013. "Comparative building simulation study utilising measured and estimated solar irradiance for Australian locations," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 86-93.
    10. Nonnenmacher, Lukas & Kaur, Amanpreet & Coimbra, Carlos F.M., 2016. "Day-ahead resource forecasting for concentrated solar power integration," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 866-876.
    11. Benkaciali, Saïd & Haddadi, Mourad & Khellaf, Abdellah, 2018. "Evaluation of direct solar irradiance from 18 broadband parametric models: Case of Algeria," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 694-711.
    12. Amani, Madjid & Ghenaiet, Adel, 2020. "Novel hybridization of solar central receiver system with combined cycle power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    13. Jentsch, Mark F. & James, Patrick A.B. & Bourikas, Leonidas & Bahaj, AbuBakr S., 2013. "Transforming existing weather data for worldwide locations to enable energy and building performance simulation under future climates," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 514-524.
    14. Sun, Xixi & Bright, Jamie M. & Gueymard, Christian A. & Bai, Xinyu & Acord, Brendan & Wang, Peng, 2021. "Worldwide performance assessment of 95 direct and diffuse clear-sky irradiance models using principal component analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    15. Marzo, A. & Trigo-Gonzalez, M. & Alonso-Montesinos, J. & Martínez-Durbán, M. & López, G. & Ferrada, P. & Fuentealba, E. & Cortés, M. & Batlles, F.J., 2017. "Daily global solar radiation estimation in desert areas using daily extreme temperatures and extraterrestrial radiation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 303-311.
    16. Mayer, Martin János & Yang, Dazhi, 2023. "Pairing ensemble numerical weather prediction with ensemble physical model chain for probabilistic photovoltaic power forecasting," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    17. Deo, Ravinesh C. & Şahin, Mehmet, 2017. "Forecasting long-term global solar radiation with an ANN algorithm coupled with satellite-derived (MODIS) land surface temperature (LST) for regional locations in Queensland," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 828-848.
    18. Boland, John & Huang, Jing & Ridley, Barbara, 2013. "Decomposing global solar radiation into its direct and diffuse components," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 749-756.
    19. Victor Hugo Wentz & Joylan Nunes Maciel & Jorge Javier Gimenez Ledesma & Oswaldo Hideo Ando Junior, 2022. "Solar Irradiance Forecasting to Short-Term PV Power: Accuracy Comparison of ANN and LSTM Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-23, March.
    20. Copper, J.K. & Sproul, A.B., 2012. "Comparative study of mathematical models in estimating solar irradiance for Australia," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 130-139.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:178:y:2021:i:c:p:830-844. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.