IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v235y2023ics0951832023001345.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Simulation modeling of operation and coordination of agencies involved in post-disaster response and recovery

Author

Listed:
  • Valaei Sharif, Shahab
  • Habibi Moshfegh, Peyman
  • Kashani, Hamed

Abstract

A disaster's response and recovery phases can be characterized by the breadth of activities, complex interrelationships of multiple involved agencies, and uncertain outcomes. Proper performance and collaboration of responsible agencies can mitigate disaster-induced losses. Past studies have not holistically investigated the role of responsible agencies’ operation and cooperation in post-disaster community recovery. This study proposes a hybrid framework that facilitates the probabilistic modeling of responsible agencies' post-disaster performance and coordination. An Agent-based Modeling (ABM) sub-model simulates the operations and interactions of responsible agencies. A System Dynamics (SD) sub-model characterizes multiple dynamical phenomena of interest: (1) provision of essentials to people, (2) infectious disease outbreak, and (3) crime outbreak and prevention. The proposed model simulates the progress of multiple Emergency Support Functions (ESFs) and evaluates their broader impact on the community. It is applied to a virtual community where several agencies must operate and collaborate to respond to an earthquake. Results underline the importance of inter-organization collaboration in the timely restoration of infrastructure systems and households. The proposed modeling framework can examine the effectiveness of various coordination schemes in disaster response and recovery, which can be used to develop plans to better respond to probable future disasters.

Suggested Citation

  • Valaei Sharif, Shahab & Habibi Moshfegh, Peyman & Kashani, Hamed, 2023. "Simulation modeling of operation and coordination of agencies involved in post-disaster response and recovery," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:235:y:2023:i:c:s0951832023001345
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2023.109219
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832023001345
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2023.109219?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Reilly, Allison C. & Baroud, Hiba & Flage, Roger & Gerst, Michael D., 2021. "Sources of uncertainty in interdependent infrastructure and their implications," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    2. Qudrat-Ullah, Hassan & Seong, Baek Seo, 2010. "How to do structural validity of a system dynamics type simulation model: The case of an energy policy model," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(5), pages 2216-2224, May.
    3. Nitesh Bharosa & JinKyu Lee & Marijn Janssen, 2010. "Challenges and obstacles in sharing and coordinating information during multi-agency disaster response: Propositions from field exercises," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 49-65, March.
    4. I M Newsome, 2008. "Using system dynamics to model the impact of policing activity on performance," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 59(2), pages 164-170, February.
    5. Brian Heath & Raymond Hill & Frank Ciarallo, 2009. "A Survey of Agent-Based Modeling Practices (January 1998 to July 2008)," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 12(4), pages 1-9.
    6. Dubaniowski, Mateusz Iwo & Heinimann, Hans Rudolf, 2020. "A framework for modeling interdependencies among households, businesses, and infrastructure systems; and their response to disruptions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    7. Sierra C. Woodruff & Patrick Regan, 2019. "Quality of national adaptation plans and opportunities for improvement," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 53-71, January.
    8. Sharma, Neetesh & Gardoni, Paolo, 2022. "Mathematical modeling of interdependent infrastructure: An object-oriented approach for generalized network-system analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    9. Aaron Opdyke & Florence Lepropre & Amy Javernick-Will & Matthew Koschmann, 2017. "Inter-organizational resource coordination in post-disaster infrastructure recovery," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(8-9), pages 514-530, September.
    10. Hazhir Rahmandad & John Sterman, 2008. "Heterogeneity and Network Structure in the Dynamics of Diffusion: Comparing Agent-Based and Differential Equation Models," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(5), pages 998-1014, May.
    11. Hassan, Emad M. & Mahmoud, Hussam, 2020. "An integrated socio-technical approach for post-earthquake recovery of interdependent healthcare system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    12. Ouyang, Min, 2014. "Review on modeling and simulation of interdependent critical infrastructure systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 43-60.
    13. Li, Yulong & Lin, Jie & Zhang, Chi & Zhu, Huaxing & Zeng, Saixing & Sun, Chengshaung, 2022. "Joint optimization of structure and protection of interdependent infrastructure networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 218(PB).
    14. He, Xian & Cha, Eun Jeong, 2018. "Modeling the damage and recovery of interdependent critical infrastructure systems from natural hazards," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 162-175.
    15. Zhikun Ding & Wenyan Gong & Shenghan Li & Zezhou Wu, 2018. "System Dynamics versus Agent-Based Modeling: A Review of Complexity Simulation in Construction Waste Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-13, July.
    16. Mateusz Iwo Dubaniowski & Hans R. Heinimann, 2020. "A framework for modeling interdependencies among households, businesses, and infrastructure systems; and their response to disruptions," Papers 2006.05678, arXiv.org.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mahmoud, Hussam & Kirsch, Thomas & O'Neil, Dan & Anderson, Shelby, 2023. "The resilience of health care systems following major disruptive events: Current practice and a path forward," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    2. Shahab Valaei Sharif & Dawn Cassandra Parker & Paul Waddell & Ted Tsiakopoulos, 2023. "Understanding the Effects of Market Volatility on Profitability Perceptions of Housing Market Developers," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-34, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Magoua, Joseph Jonathan & Li, Nan, 2023. "The human factor in the disaster resilience modeling of critical infrastructure systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    2. Dubaniowski, Mateusz Iwo & Heinimann, Hans Rudolf, 2021. "Framework for modeling interdependencies between households, businesses, and infrastructure system, and their response to disruptions—application," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    3. Brunner, L.G. & Peer, R.A.M. & Zorn, C. & Paulik, R. & Logan, T.M., 2024. "Understanding cascading risks through real-world interdependent urban infrastructure," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    4. Sharma, Neetesh & Gardoni, Paolo, 2022. "Mathematical modeling of interdependent infrastructure: An object-oriented approach for generalized network-system analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    5. Munikoti, Sai & Lai, Kexing & Natarajan, Balasubramaniam, 2021. "Robustness assessment of Hetero-functional graph theory based model of interdependent urban utility networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    6. Moglen, Rachel L. & Barth, Julius & Gupta, Shagun & Kawai, Eiji & Klise, Katherine & Leibowicz, Benjamin D., 2023. "A nexus approach to infrastructure resilience planning under uncertainty," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    7. Lu, Qing-Chang & Xu, Peng-Cheng & Zhao, Xiangmo & Zhang, Lei & Li, Xiaoling & Cui, Xin, 2022. "Measuring network interdependency between dependent networks: A supply-demand-based approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    8. Rixen, Martin & Weigand, Jürgen, 2014. "Agent-based simulation of policy induced diffusion of smart meters," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 153-167.
    9. Mühlhofer, Evelyn & Koks, Elco E. & Kropf, Chahan M. & Sansavini, Giovanni & Bresch, David N., 2023. "A generalized natural hazard risk modelling framework for infrastructure failure cascades," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    10. Blagojević, Nikola & Didier, Max & Stojadinović, Božidar, 2022. "Quantifying component importance for disaster resilience of communities with interdependent civil infrastructure systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    11. Qingchun Li & Bryce Hannibal & Ali Mostafavi & Philip Berke & Sierra Woodruff & Arnold Vedlitz, 2020. "Examining of the actor collaboration networks around hazard mitigation: a hurricane harvey study," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 103(3), pages 3541-3562, September.
    12. Nguyen, Hung & Abdel-Mottaleb, Noha & Uddin, Shihab & Zhang, Qiong & Lu, Qing & Zhang, He & Li, Mingyang, 2022. "Joint maintenance planning of deteriorating co-located road and water infrastructures with interdependencies," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    13. Jingjing Kong & Slobodan P. Simonovic & Chao Zhang, 2019. "Resilience Assessment of Interdependent Infrastructure Systems: A Case Study Based on Different Response Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-31, November.
    14. Du, Ao & Wang, Xiaowei & Xie, Yazhou & Dong, You, 2023. "Regional seismic risk and resilience assessment: Methodological development, applicability, and future research needs – An earthquake engineering perspective," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    15. Bellè, Andrea & Abdin, Adam F. & Fang, Yi-Ping & Zeng, Zhiguo & Barros, Anne, 2023. "A resilience-based framework for the optimal coupling of interdependent critical infrastructures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    16. Jamar Kattel, Prakash & Aros-Vera, Felipe, 2020. "Critical infrastructure location under supporting station dependencies considerations," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    17. Xu, Min & Li, Guoyuan & Chen, Anthony, 2024. "Resilience-driven post-disaster restoration of interdependent infrastructure systems under different decision-making environments," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    18. Ma, Xiangyu & Zhou, Huijie & Li, Zhiyi, 2021. "On the resilience of modern power systems: A complex network perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    19. Mateusz Iwo Dubaniowski & Hans Rudolf Heinimann, 2021. "Time Granularity Impact on Propagation of Disruptions in a System-of-Systems Simulation of Infrastructure and Business Networks," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-24, April.
    20. Sun, Li & D'Ayala, Dina & Fayjaloun, Rosemary & Gehl, Pierre, 2021. "Agent-based model on resilience-oriented rapid responses of road networks under seismic hazard," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:235:y:2023:i:c:s0951832023001345. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.