IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v162y2017icp40-50.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Automated matching of pipeline corrosion features from in-line inspection data

Author

Listed:
  • Dann, Markus R.
  • Dann, Christoph

Abstract

The integrity assessment of corroded pipelines is often based on in-line inspection (ILI) results. Before determining the corrosion growth for the integrity assessment, the detected corrosion features from two or more ILIs need to be matched with respect to their location in the pipeline. The objective of this paper is to introduce a framework for automated feature matching. The input for the framework is the locations of all detected corrosion features and girth welds from each ILI. Using a multi-step approach, the size of several ILIs with a possibly large number of features is reduced to a set of independent smaller problems to match efficiently the corrosion features. The results include the matched features for the subsequent corrosion growth analysis and the identification of outliers that cannot be matched. The applied probabilistic matching assigns to each feature pair a probability of being a match to reflect the inherent uncertainty in the matching process. The proposed framework replaces manual matching, which can be time intensive and prone to errors, particularly for internal corrosion with high feature densities. It reliably matches features in pipelines and supports the integrity and risk assessment of pipeline systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Dann, Markus R. & Dann, Christoph, 2017. "Automated matching of pipeline corrosion features from in-line inspection data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 40-50.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:162:y:2017:i:c:p:40-50
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2017.01.008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832017300583
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2017.01.008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Qin, H. & Zhou, W. & Zhang, S., 2015. "Bayesian inferences of generation and growth of corrosion defects on energy pipelines based on imperfect inspection data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 334-342.
    2. van Noortwijk, J.M., 2009. "A survey of the application of gamma processes in maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(1), pages 2-21.
    3. Zhang, Shenwei & Zhou, Wenxing, 2014. "Bayesian dynamic linear model for growth of corrosion defects on energy pipelines," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 24-31.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Amaya-Gómez, Rafael & Schoefs, Franck & Sánchez-Silva, Mauricio & Muñoz, Felipe & Bastidas-Arteaga, Emilio, 2022. "Matching of corroded defects in onshore pipelines based on In-Line Inspections and Voronoi partitions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    2. Dann, Markus R. & Maes, Marc A., 2018. "Stochastic corrosion growth modeling for pipelines using mass inspection data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 245-254.
    3. Zhang, Tieyao & Shuai, Jian & Shuai, Yi & Hua, Luoyi & Xu, Kui & Xie, Dong & Mei, Yuan, 2023. "Efficient prediction method of triple failure pressure for corroded pipelines under complex loads based on a backpropagation neural network," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    4. Mohd Fadly Hisham Ismail & Zazilah May & Vijanth Sagayan Asirvadam & Nazrul Anuar Nayan, 2023. "Machine-Learning-Based Classification for Pipeline Corrosion with Monte Carlo Probabilistic Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-13, April.
    5. Heidary, Roohollah & Groth, Katrina M., 2021. "A hybrid population-based degradation model for pipeline pitting corrosion," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dann, Markus R. & Maes, Marc A., 2018. "Stochastic corrosion growth modeling for pipelines using mass inspection data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 245-254.
    2. Hazra, Indranil & Pandey, Mahesh D. & Manzana, Noldainerick, 2020. "Approximate Bayesian computation (ABC) method for estimating parameters of the gamma process using noisy data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    3. Sun, Xuxue & Mraied, Hesham & Cai, Wenjun & Zhang, Qiong & Liang, Guoyuan & Li, Mingyang, 2018. "Bayesian latent degradation performance modeling and quantification of corroding aluminum alloys," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 84-96.
    4. Heidary, Roohollah & Groth, Katrina M., 2021. "A hybrid population-based degradation model for pipeline pitting corrosion," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    5. Song, Kai & Shi, Jian & Yi, Xiaojian, 2020. "A time-discrete and zero-adjusted gamma process model with application to degradation analysis," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 560(C).
    6. Thomas Michael Welte & Iver Bakken Sperstad & Espen Høegh Sørum & Magne Lorentzen Kolstad, 2017. "Integration of Degradation Processes in a Strategic Offshore Wind Farm O&M Simulation Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-18, July.
    7. Finkelstein, Maxim & Cha, Ji Hwan & Langston, Amy, 2023. "Improving classical optimal age-replacement policies for degrading items," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    8. Phuc Do & Christophe Bérenguer, 2022. "Residual life-based importance measures for predictive maintenance decision-making," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 236(1), pages 98-113, February.
    9. Wang, Xiaolin & Liu, Bin & Zhao, Xiujie, 2021. "A performance-based warranty for products subject to competing hard and soft failures," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    10. Nicolai, R.P. & Frenk, J.B.G. & Dekker, R., 2007. "Modelling and Optimizing Imperfect Maintenance of Coatings on Steel Structures," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2007-043-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    11. Lin Wang & Zhiqiang Lu & Yifei Ren, 2019. "A rolling horizon approach for production planning and condition-based maintenance under uncertain demand," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 233(6), pages 1014-1028, December.
    12. Liang, Qingzhu & Yang, Yinghao & Peng, Changhong, 2023. "A reliability model for systems subject to mutually dependent degradation processes and random shocks under dynamic environments," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    13. Shen, Jingyuan & Cui, Lirong & Ma, Yizhong, 2019. "Availability and optimal maintenance policy for systems degrading in dynamic environments," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 276(1), pages 133-143.
    14. Maxim Finkelstein & Ji Hwan Cha, 2022. "Reducing degradation and age of items in imperfect repair modeling," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 31(4), pages 1058-1081, December.
    15. Lu, Biao & Zhou, Xiaojun, 2017. "Opportunistic preventive maintenance scheduling for serial-parallel multistage manufacturing systems with multiple streams of deterioration," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 116-127.
    16. Xudan Chen & Guoxun Ji & Xinli Sun & Zhen Li, 2019. "Inverse Gaussian–based model with measurement errors for degradation analysis," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 233(6), pages 1086-1098, December.
    17. Liu, Xingheng & Matias, José & Jäschke, Johannes & Vatn, Jørn, 2022. "Gibbs sampler for noisy Transformed Gamma process: Inference and remaining useful life estimation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    18. Giorgio, Massimiliano & Pulcini, Gianpaolo, 2018. "A new state-dependent degradation process and related model misidentification problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(3), pages 1027-1038.
    19. Jiang, R., 2010. "Optimization of alarm threshold and sequential inspection scheme," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(3), pages 208-215.
    20. Zuo, Jian & Cadet, Catherine & Li, Zhongliang & Bérenguer, Christophe & Outbib, Rachid, 2024. "A deterioration-aware energy management strategy for the lifetime improvement of a multi-stack fuel cell system subject to a random dynamic load," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:162:y:2017:i:c:p:40-50. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.