IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v236y2022i1p98-113.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Residual life-based importance measures for predictive maintenance decision-making

Author

Listed:
  • Phuc Do
  • Christophe Bérenguer

Abstract

Importance measures have been widely used as meaningful decision-aiding indicators in reliability engineering, risk management and maintenance optimization. However, few importance measures integrates the actual condition (working states or degradation levels) of components that dynamically evolves with time. This work develops a novel time-dependent importance measure defined as the capacity of a component (or group of components) to improve, when it is replaced, the system residual life. The proposed I M MRL measure can help to better prioritize a component or group of components regarding to its improvement ability in the system life time while considering the actual conditions of all components of the system. The originality and complementarity of the proposed measure when compared to existing importance measures is also investigated. The proposed importance measure is then extended to integrate the economic dimension of the maintenance decision, through the maintenance costs, the benefit gained by the maintenance operations and as well as the economic dependence between components. It is finally shown how the proposed I M MRL measure and its extension can “optimally†suggest a component or a group of several components for preventive maintenance decision-making, based on both the technical criterion (residual life of the system) and the economic aspects (benefit and costs). The use and the advantages of the proposed importance measure and its extension are illustrated on a four-component system.

Suggested Citation

  • Phuc Do & Christophe Bérenguer, 2022. "Residual life-based importance measures for predictive maintenance decision-making," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 236(1), pages 98-113, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:236:y:2022:i:1:p:98-113
    DOI: 10.1177/1748006X211028112
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748006X211028112
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1748006X211028112?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Borgonovo, E., 2008. "Differential importance and comparative statics: An application to inventory management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(1), pages 170-179, January.
    2. Lu, Xuefei & Baraldi, Piero & Zio, Enrico, 2020. "A data-driven framework for identifying important components in complex systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    3. Hong, J. S. & Koo, H. Y. & Lie, C. H., 2002. "Joint reliability importance of k-out-of-n systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(3), pages 539-547, November.
    4. Robin P. Nicolai & Rommert Dekker, 2008. "Optimal Maintenance of Multi-component Systems: A Review," Springer Series in Reliability Engineering, in: Complex System Maintenance Handbook, chapter 11, pages 263-286, Springer.
    5. Xia, Tangbin & Dong, Yifan & Xiao, Lei & Du, Shichang & Pan, Ershun & Xi, Lifeng, 2018. "Recent advances in prognostics and health management for advanced manufacturing paradigms," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 255-268.
    6. Do, Phuc & Assaf, Roy & Scarf, Phil & Iung, Benoit, 2019. "Modelling and application of condition-based maintenance for a two-component system with stochastic and economic dependencies," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 86-97.
    7. Do, Phuc & Bérenguer, Christophe, 2020. "Conditional reliability-based importance measures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    8. Wildeman, R. E. & Dekker, R. & Smit, A. C. J. M., 1997. "A dynamic policy for grouping maintenance activities," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 99(3), pages 530-551, June.
    9. Nguyen, Kim-Anh & Do, Phuc & Grall, Antoine, 2017. "Joint predictive maintenance and inventory strategy for multi-component systems using Birnbaum’s structural importance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 249-261.
    10. Wu, Shaomin & Chen, Yi & Wu, Qingtai & Wang, Zhonglai, 2016. "Linking component importance to optimisation of preventive maintenance policy," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 26-32.
    11. Zhang, Mimi, 2020. "A heuristic policy for maintaining multiple multi-state systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    12. Borgonovo, Emanuele & Aliee, Hananeh & Glaß, Michael & Teich, Jürgen, 2016. "A new time-independent reliability importance measure," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 254(2), pages 427-442.
    13. van Noortwijk, J.M., 2009. "A survey of the application of gamma processes in maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(1), pages 2-21.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Do, Phuc & Bérenguer, Christophe, 2020. "Conditional reliability-based importance measures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    2. de Jonge, Bram & Scarf, Philip A., 2020. "A review on maintenance optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(3), pages 805-824.
    3. Zhu, Xiaoyan & Chen, Zhiqiang & Borgonovo, Emanuele, 2021. "Remaining-useful-lifetime and system-remaining-profit based importance measures for decisions on preventive maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    4. Dui, Hongyan & Liu, Meng & Song, Jiaying & Wu, Shaomin, 2023. "Importance measure-based resilience management: Review, methodology and perspectives on maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    5. Vu, Hai Canh & Do, Phuc & Fouladirad, Mitra & Grall, Antoine, 2020. "Dynamic opportunistic maintenance planning for multi-component redundant systems with various types of opportunities," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    6. Dui, Hongyan & Wu, Shaomin & Zhao, Jiangbin, 2021. "Some extensions of the component maintenance priority," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    7. Aizpurua, J.I. & Catterson, V.M. & Papadopoulos, Y. & Chiacchio, F. & D'Urso, D., 2017. "Supporting group maintenance through prognostics-enhanced dynamic dependability prediction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 171-188.
    8. Wang, Yukun & Li, Xiaopeng & Chen, Junyan & Liu, Yiliu, 2022. "A condition-based maintenance policy for multi-component systems subject to stochastic and economic dependencies," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    9. Urbani, Michele & Brunelli, Matteo & Punkka, Antti, 2023. "An approach for bi-objective maintenance scheduling on a networked system with limited resources," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 305(1), pages 101-113.
    10. Do, Phuc & Assaf, Roy & Scarf, Phil & Iung, Benoit, 2019. "Modelling and application of condition-based maintenance for a two-component system with stochastic and economic dependencies," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 86-97.
    11. Van Horenbeek, Adriaan & Pintelon, Liliane, 2013. "A dynamic predictive maintenance policy for complex multi-component systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 39-50.
    12. Zhang, Mimi, 2020. "A heuristic policy for maintaining multiple multi-state systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    13. Ayse Sena Eruguz & Tarkan Tan & Geert‐Jan van Houtum, 2017. "Optimizing usage and maintenance decisions for k‐out‐of‐n systems of moving assets," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 64(5), pages 418-434, August.
    14. Nguyen, Ho Si Hung & Do, Phuc & Vu, Hai-Canh & Iung, Benoit, 2019. "Dynamic maintenance grouping and routing for geographically dispersed production systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 392-404.
    15. Lu, Biao & Zhou, Xiaojun, 2017. "Opportunistic preventive maintenance scheduling for serial-parallel multistage manufacturing systems with multiple streams of deterioration," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 116-127.
    16. Vimal Vijayan & Sanjay K Chaturvedi, 2021. "Multi-component maintenance grouping optimization based on stochastic dependency," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 235(2), pages 293-305, April.
    17. Cheng, Guoqing & Li, Ling, 2020. "Joint optimization of production, quality control and maintenance for serial-parallel multistage production systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    18. Vimal Vijayan & Sanjay K Chaturvedi & Ritesh Chandra, 2020. "A failure interaction model for multicomponent repairable systems," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 234(3), pages 470-486, June.
    19. Markus Bohlin & Mathias Wärja, 2015. "Maintenance optimization with duration-dependent costs," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 224(1), pages 1-23, January.
    20. Vu, Hai Canh & Do, Phuc & Barros, Anne & Bérenguer, Christophe, 2014. "Maintenance grouping strategy for multi-component systems with dynamic contexts," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 233-249.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:236:y:2022:i:1:p:98-113. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.