IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v160y2017icp151-161.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Opportunistic maintenance considering non-homogenous opportunity arrivals and stochastic opportunity durations

Author

Listed:
  • Truong Ba, H.
  • Cholette, M.E.
  • Borghesani, P.
  • Zhou, Y.
  • Ma, L.

Abstract

Many systems and manufacturing processes undergo intermittent operation due to external factors (e.g. weather, low market prices), offering opportunities to conduct maintenance with reduced production losses. Making use of appropriate opportunities can thus lead to significant reduction in the total cost of maintenance and improvement in productivity. In this paper, an opportunistic maintenance (OM) model is developed considering two critical properties of real world opportunities: (i) non-homogeneous opportunity arrivals and (ii) stochastic opportunity duration. The model enables exploiting downtime cost savings from “partial†opportunities (stops shorter than the required maintenance time) thus extending the potential benefit of OM. The criteria for accepting maintenance opportunities are found by minimizing the single-cycle total cost. A closed form expression of the single-cycle total cost is derived for a given PM/OM policy and then a Genetic Algorithm is used to solve the optimization problem. Numerical results are presented to assess the benefit of opportunistic maintenance and the marginal benefit of considering partial opportunities. Results indicate that significant savings can be achieved by considering OM. Moreover, it is shown that the novel consideration of partial opportunities significantly increase the benefit of OM.

Suggested Citation

  • Truong Ba, H. & Cholette, M.E. & Borghesani, P. & Zhou, Y. & Ma, L., 2017. "Opportunistic maintenance considering non-homogenous opportunity arrivals and stochastic opportunity durations," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 151-161.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:160:y:2017:i:c:p:151-161
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2016.12.011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095183201631002X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2016.12.011?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xiaohong Zhang & Jianchao Zeng, 2015. "Deterioration state space partitioning method for opportunistic maintenance modelling of identical multi-unit systems," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(7), pages 2100-2118, April.
    2. Kijima, Masaaki & Morimura, Hidenori & Suzuki, Yasusuke, 1988. "Periodical replacement problem without assuming minimal repair," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 194-203, November.
    3. Zhang, Mimi & Gaudoin, Olivier & Xie, Min, 2015. "Degradation-based maintenance decision using stochastic filtering for systems under imperfect maintenance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 245(2), pages 531-541.
    4. Coolen-Schrijner, P. & Coolen, F.P.A., 2007. "Nonparametric adaptive age replacement with a one-cycle criterion," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 92(1), pages 74-84.
    5. Richard Barlow & Larry Hunter, 1960. "Optimum Preventive Maintenance Policies," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 8(1), pages 90-100, February.
    6. Zhang, Xiaohong & Zeng, Jianchao, 2015. "A general modeling method for opportunistic maintenance modeling of multi-unit systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 176-190.
    7. Peng, Hao & van Houtum, Geert-Jan, 2016. "Joint optimization of condition-based maintenance and production lot-sizing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 253(1), pages 94-107.
    8. de Jonge, Bram & Dijkstra, Arjan S. & Romeijnders, Ward, 2015. "Cost benefits of postponing time-based maintenance under lifetime distribution uncertainty," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 15-21.
    9. Rommert Dekker & Eric Smeitink, 1994. "Preventive maintenance at opportunities of restricted duration," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(3), pages 335-353, April.
    10. Hongzhou Wang & Hoang Pham, 2006. "Reliability and Optimal Maintenance," Springer Series in Reliability Engineering, Springer, number 978-1-84628-325-3, January.
    11. Sarker, Bhaba R. & Faiz, Tasnim Ibn, 2016. "Minimizing maintenance cost for offshore wind turbines following multi-level opportunistic preventive strategy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 104-113.
    12. Xia, Tangbin & Jin, Xiaoning & Xi, Lifeng & Ni, Jun, 2015. "Production-driven opportunistic maintenance for batch production based on MAM–APB scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 240(3), pages 781-790.
    13. Li, Heping & Deloux, Estelle & Dieulle, Laurence, 2016. "A condition-based maintenance policy for multi-component systems with Lévy copulas dependence," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 44-55.
    14. Do Van, Phuc & Barros, Anne & Bérenguer, Christophe & Bouvard, Keomany & Brissaud, Florent, 2013. "Dynamic grouping maintenance with time limited opportunities," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 51-59.
    15. Sheu, Shey-Huei & Lin, Yuh-Bin & Liao, Gwo-Liang, 2006. "Optimum policies for a system with general imperfect maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 91(3), pages 362-369.
    16. D Venkat & F P A Coolen & P Coolen-Schrijner, 2010. "Extended opportunity-based age replacement with a one-cycle criterion," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 224(1), pages 55-62, March.
    17. Ding, Fangfang & Tian, Zhigang, 2012. "Opportunistic maintenance for wind farms considering multi-level imperfect maintenance thresholds," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 175-182.
    18. Bedford, Tim & Dewan, Isha & Meilijson, Isaac & Zitrou, Athena, 2011. "The signal model: A model for competing risks of opportunistic maintenance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 214(3), pages 665-673, November.
    19. Cavalcante, Cristiano A.V. & Lopes, Rodrigo S., 2015. "Multi-criteria model to support the definition of opportunistic maintenance policy: A study in a cogeneration system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 32-40.
    20. Hong, H.P. & Zhou, W. & Zhang, S. & Ye, W., 2014. "Optimal condition-based maintenance decisions for systems with dependent stochastic degradation of components," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 276-288.
    21. P Coolen-Schrijner & S C Shaw & F P A Coolen, 2009. "Opportunity-based age replacement with a one-cycle criterion," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(10), pages 1428-1438, October.
    22. Zhou, Yifan & Lin, Tian Ran & Sun, Yong & Bian, Yangqing & Ma, Lin, 2015. "An effective approach to reducing strategy space for maintenance optimisation of multistate series–parallel systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 40-53.
    23. Rasmekomen, Nipat & Parlikad, Ajith Kumar, 2016. "Condition-based maintenance of multi-component systems with degradation state-rate interactions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 1-10.
    24. Nguyen, Kim-Anh & Do, Phuc & Grall, Antoine, 2015. "Multi-level predictive maintenance for multi-component systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 83-94.
    25. Dekker, Rommert, 1995. "Integrating optimisation, priority setting, planning and combining of maintenance activities," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 82(2), pages 225-240, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liang, Zhenglin & Parlikad, Ajith Kumar, 2020. "Predictive group maintenance for multi-system multi-component networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    2. Aseem K. Mishra & Divya Shrivastava & Prem Vrat, 2020. "An opportunistic group maintenance model for the multi-unit series system employing Jaya algorithm," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 57(2), pages 603-628, June.
    3. Zhou, Xiaojun & Ning, Xiaohan, 2021. "Maintenance gravity window based opportunistic maintenance scheduling for multi-unit serial systems with stochastic production waits," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    4. Vu, Hai Canh & Do, Phuc & Fouladirad, Mitra & Grall, Antoine, 2020. "Dynamic opportunistic maintenance planning for multi-component redundant systems with various types of opportunities," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    5. Wang, Jinhe & Zhang, Xiaohong & Zeng, Jianchao & Zhang, Yunzheng, 2020. "Joint external and internal opportunistic optimisation for wind turbine considering wind velocity," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 380-398.
    6. de Jonge, Bram & Scarf, Philip A., 2020. "A review on maintenance optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(3), pages 805-824.
    7. McMorland, J. & Collu, M. & McMillan, D. & Carroll, J. & Coraddu, A., 2023. "Opportunistic maintenance for offshore wind: A review and proposal of future framework," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. de Jonge, Bram & Scarf, Philip A., 2020. "A review on maintenance optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(3), pages 805-824.
    2. Berrade, M.D. & Scarf, P.A. & Cavalcante, C.A.V., 2017. "A study of postponed replacement in a delay time model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 70-79.
    3. Olde Keizer, Minou C.A. & Flapper, Simme Douwe P. & Teunter, Ruud H., 2017. "Condition-based maintenance policies for systems with multiple dependent components: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(2), pages 405-420.
    4. Xia, Tangbin & Xi, Lifeng & Pan, Ershun & Ni, Jun, 2017. "Reconfiguration-oriented opportunistic maintenance policy for reconfigurable manufacturing systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 87-98.
    5. Alaswad, Suzan & Xiang, Yisha, 2017. "A review on condition-based maintenance optimization models for stochastically deteriorating system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 54-63.
    6. Nguyen, Kim-Anh & Do, Phuc & Grall, Antoine, 2017. "Joint predictive maintenance and inventory strategy for multi-component systems using Birnbaum’s structural importance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 249-261.
    7. Vu, Hai Canh & Do, Phuc & Fouladirad, Mitra & Grall, Antoine, 2020. "Dynamic opportunistic maintenance planning for multi-component redundant systems with various types of opportunities," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    8. Li, Heping & Zhu, Wenjin & Dieulle, Laurence & Deloux, Estelle, 2022. "Condition-based maintenance strategies for stochastically dependent systems using Nested Lévy copulas," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    9. Aizpurua, J.I. & Catterson, V.M. & Papadopoulos, Y. & Chiacchio, F. & D'Urso, D., 2017. "Supporting group maintenance through prognostics-enhanced dynamic dependability prediction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 171-188.
    10. Juan Izquierdo & Adolfo Crespo Márquez & Jone Uribetxebarria & Asier Erguido, 2019. "Framework for Managing Maintenance of Wind Farms Based on a Clustering Approach and Dynamic Opportunistic Maintenance," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-17, May.
    11. Hamidi, Maryam & Szidarovszky, Ferenc & Szidarovszky, Miklos, 2016. "New one cycle criteria for optimizing preventive replacement policies," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 42-48.
    12. Sheu, Shey-Huei & Tsai, Hsin-Nan & Sheu, Uan-Yu & Zhang, Zhe George, 2019. "Optimal replacement policies for a system based on a one-cycle criterion," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    13. de Jonge, Bram & Dijkstra, Arjan S. & Romeijnders, Ward, 2015. "Cost benefits of postponing time-based maintenance under lifetime distribution uncertainty," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 15-21.
    14. Liu, Bin & Pandey, Mahesh D. & Wang, Xiaolin & Zhao, Xiujie, 2021. "A finite-horizon condition-based maintenance policy for a two-unit system with dependent degradation processes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 295(2), pages 705-717.
    15. Wang, Yukun & Li, Xiaopeng & Chen, Junyan & Liu, Yiliu, 2022. "A condition-based maintenance policy for multi-component systems subject to stochastic and economic dependencies," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    16. Do, Phuc & Assaf, Roy & Scarf, Phil & Iung, Benoit, 2019. "Modelling and application of condition-based maintenance for a two-component system with stochastic and economic dependencies," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 86-97.
    17. Izquierdo, J. & Márquez, A. Crespo & Uribetxebarria, J. & Erguido, A., 2020. "On the importance of assessing the operational context impact on maintenance management for life cycle cost of wind energy projects," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 1100-1110.
    18. Lin Wang & Zhiqiang Lu & Yifei Ren, 2019. "A rolling horizon approach for production planning and condition-based maintenance under uncertain demand," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 233(6), pages 1014-1028, December.
    19. Lu, Biao & Zhou, Xiaojun, 2017. "Opportunistic preventive maintenance scheduling for serial-parallel multistage manufacturing systems with multiple streams of deterioration," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 116-127.
    20. Xu, Jun & Liang, Zhenglin & Li, Yan-Fu & Wang, Kaibo, 2021. "Generalized condition-based maintenance optimization for multi-component systems considering stochastic dependency and imperfect maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:160:y:2017:i:c:p:151-161. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.