IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v121y2014icp113-120.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A case study of GAMM (graphical analysis for maintenance management) in the mining industry

Author

Listed:
  • Barberá, Luis
  • Crespo, Adolfo
  • Viveros, Pablo
  • Stegmaier, Raúl

Abstract

This paper presents a case for practical application of the GAMM method, which has been developed and published by the authors (Barberá L., Crespo A. and Viveros P.) The GAMM method supports decision-making in the overall maintenance management, through the visualization and graphical analysis of data. In addition, it allows for the identification of anomalous behavior in the equipment analyzed, whether derived from its own operations, maintenance activities, improper use of equipment or even as a result of design errors in the equipment itself. As a basis for analysis, the GAMM method uses a nonparametric estimator of the reliability function using all historical data or, alternatively, part of the history, allowing it to perform an analysis even with limited available data. In the case study developed, GAMM has been used to analyze two slurry pumps in a mining plant located in Chile. Both pumps are part of the same industrial process, which is described in Section 3, and both pumps had a higher failure rate but one more than the other. GAMM identified deficiencies in each of the pumps being studied, thus improving decision-making and problem solving process related to the maintenance of the pumps.

Suggested Citation

  • Barberá, Luis & Crespo, Adolfo & Viveros, Pablo & Stegmaier, Raúl, 2014. "A case study of GAMM (graphical analysis for maintenance management) in the mining industry," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 113-120.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:121:y:2014:i:c:p:113-120
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2013.07.017
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832013002275
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2013.07.017?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Crespo Marquez, Adolfo & Gupta, Jatinder N.D., 2006. "Contemporary maintenance management: process, framework and supporting pillars," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 313-326, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hao Li & Shanghua Mi & Qifeng Li & Xiaoyu Wen & Dongping Qiao & Guofu Luo, 2020. "A scheduling optimization method for maintenance, repair and operations service resources of complex products," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 31(7), pages 1673-1691, October.
    2. Pascual, R. & Godoy, D. & Louit, D.M., 2011. "Throughput centered prioritization of machines in transfer lines," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(10), pages 1396-1401.
    3. Bouvard, K. & Artus, S. & Bérenguer, C. & Cocquempot, V., 2011. "Condition-based dynamic maintenance operations planning & grouping. Application to commercial heavy vehicles," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(6), pages 601-610.
    4. Li, Mingxin & Jiang, Xiaoli & Carroll, James & Negenborn, Rudy R., 2022. "A multi-objective maintenance strategy optimization framework for offshore wind farms considering uncertainty," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 321(C).
    5. Gabriel Eugen Garais, 2012. "Maintenance Processes Evaluation For Distributed Applications," Romanian Economic Business Review, Romanian-American University, vol. 6(2), pages 378-388, December.
    6. Berthaut, F. & Gharbi, A. & Dhouib, K., 2011. "Joint modified block replacement and production/inventory control policy for a failure-prone manufacturing cell," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 642-654, December.
    7. María Carmen Carnero, 2015. "Auditing model for the introduction of computerised maintenance management system," International Journal of Data Science, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(1), pages 17-41.
    8. Muller, Alexandre & Crespo Marquez, Adolfo & Iung, Benoît, 2008. "On the concept of e-maintenance: Review and current research," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 93(8), pages 1165-1187.
    9. Jamal Ahmed Hama Kareem & Kadhim Faraj Arif Saeed & Omar Mustafa Muhammad Faraj, 2019. "Maintenance Practices in Poor Uptime of Operating Equipment Toward Dynamic of Business Issues," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(02), pages 1-21, April.
    10. Ishizaka, Alessio & Nemery, Philippe, 2014. "Assigning machines to incomparable maintenance strategies with ELECTRE-SORT," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 45-59.
    11. Maletič Damjan & Maletič Matjaž & Al-Najjar Basim & Gotzamani Katerina & Gianni Maria & Kalinowski T. Bartosz & Gomišček Boštjan, 2017. "Contingency Factors Influencing Implementation of Physical Asset Management Practices," Organizacija, Sciendo, vol. 50(1), pages 3-16, February.
    12. Dinis, Duarte & Barbosa-Póvoa, Ana & Teixeira, Ângelo Palos, 2019. "A supporting framework for maintenance capacity planning and scheduling: Development and application in the aircraft MRO industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 1-15.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:121:y:2014:i:c:p:113-120. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.