IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/recore/v103y2015icp179-191.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis and comparison of used lubricants, regenerative technologies in the world

Author

Listed:
  • Jafari, Ahmad Jonidi
  • Hassanpour, Malek

Abstract

Used lubricants can be an important resource for oil-producing countries. Lubricants are categorized as hazardous wastes as they contain high levels of environmentally toxic organic compounds such as PCBs, PAHs and heavy metals. A growing trend of regeneration and reuse of used lubricants has been seen in the recent years to supplement the conventional sources of energy. Thus, governments have focused on developing these recovery processes on an industrial scale. Evaluation of the individual techniques indicated that acid/clay process has the lowest cost and the highest environmental risk in comparison to the other regeneration technologies. Acidic sludge, a toxic by product of the formerly mentioned process, can be used as a raw material for production of economically valuable bitumen. The conversion is not only cost-effective, but it also reduces the environmental risk to a large degree. Economic indices and the quality of the obtained product showed that this process supports sustainable development.

Suggested Citation

  • Jafari, Ahmad Jonidi & Hassanpour, Malek, 2015. "Analysis and comparison of used lubricants, regenerative technologies in the world," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 179-191.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:recore:v:103:y:2015:i:c:p:179-191
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.07.026
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344915300598
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.07.026?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fagerberg, Jan, 2000. "Technological progress, structural change and productivity growth: a comparative study," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 11(4), pages 393-411, December.
    2. Höök, Mikael & Hirsch, Robert & Aleklett, Kjell, 2009. "Giant oil field decline rates and their influence on world oil production," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(6), pages 2262-2272, June.
    3. Mohamed Chaffai & Michel Dietsch & Ana Lozano-Vivas, 2001. "Technological and Environmental Differences in the European Banking Industries," Journal of Financial Services Research, Springer;Western Finance Association, vol. 19(2), pages 147-162, April.
    4. Pramanik, K, 2003. "Properties and use of jatropha curcas oil and diesel fuel blends in compression ignition engine," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 239-248.
    5. Wiedmann, Thomas & Minx, Jan & Barrett, John & Wackernagel, Mathis, 2006. "Allocating ecological footprints to final consumption categories with input-output analysis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(1), pages 28-48, January.
    6. van Kasteren, J.M.N. & Nisworo, A.P., 2007. "A process model to estimate the cost of industrial scale biodiesel production from waste cooking oil by supercritical transesterification," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 50(4), pages 442-458.
    7. Krajnc, Damjan & Glavic, Peter, 2005. "How to compare companies on relevant dimensions of sustainability," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(4), pages 551-563, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Unnisa, Syeda Azeem & Hassanpour, Malek, 2017. "Development circumstances of four recycling industries (used motor oil, acidic sludge, plastic wastes and blown bitumen) in the world," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 605-624.
    2. Jose Pastor & Lorenzo Serrano, 2006. "The Effect of Specialisation on Banks' Efficiency: An International Comparison," International Review of Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(1), pages 125-149.
    3. Olivier Boiral & Marie‐Christine Brotherton & Léo Rivaud & David Talbot, 2022. "Comparing the uncomparable? An investigation of car manufacturers' climate performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 2213-2229, July.
    4. Williams, Jonathan, 2004. "Determining management behaviour in European banking," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 28(10), pages 2427-2460, October.
    5. Germinal G. Van, 2021. "An Econometric Analysis of the Impact of Structural Changes on the Aggregate Output of the United States," Journal of Economics and Econometrics, Economics and Econometrics Society, vol. 64(3), pages 17-36.
    6. Figge, Frank & Hahn, Tobias & Barkemeyer, Ralf, 2014. "The If, How and Where of assessing sustainable resource use," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 274-283.
    7. Singh, Anuraag & Triulzi, Giorgio & Magee, Christopher L., 2021. "Technological improvement rate predictions for all technologies: Use of patent data and an extended domain description," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(9).
    8. T. Gries & R. Grundmann & I. Palnau & M. Redlin, 2017. "Innovations, growth and participation in advanced economies - a review of major concepts and findings," International Economics and Economic Policy, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 293-351, April.
    9. Aurélien Saussay, 2015. "Can the US shale revolution be duplicated in europe ?," Sciences Po publications 2015-10, Sciences Po.
    10. Teixidó Figueras, Jordi & Duro Moreno, Juan Antonio, 2012. "Ecological Footprint Inequality: A methodological review and some results," Working Papers 2072/203168, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Department of Economics.
    11. Johann Audrain & Mateo Cordier & Sylvie Faucheux & Martin O’Connor, 2013. "Écologie territoriale et indicateurs pour un développement durable de la métropole parisienne," Revue d'économie régionale et urbaine, Armand Colin, vol. 0(3), pages 523-559.
    12. Basem Ertimi & Tamat Sarmidi & Norlin Khalid & Mohd Helmi Ali, 2021. "The Policy Framework of Natural Resource Management in Oil-Dependence Countries," Economies, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-17, February.
    13. Michael Nye & Yvonne Rydin, 2008. "The Contribution of Ecological Footprinting to Planning Policy Development: Using REAP to Evaluate Policies for Sustainable Housing Construction," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 35(2), pages 227-247, April.
    14. Yulei Xie & Ling Ji & Beibei Zhang & Gordon Huang, 2018. "Evolution of the Scientific Literature on Input–Output Analysis: A Bibliometric Analysis of 1990–2017," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-17, September.
    15. Colistete, Renato P., 2010. "Revisiting Import-Substituting Industrialisation in Post-War Brazil," MPRA Paper 24665, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Claude Diebolt & Tapas Mishra & Bazoumana Ouattara & Mamata Parhi, 2010. "Does democratic distance matter for cross-country growth interdependence?," Working Papers 10-12, Association Française de Cliométrie (AFC).
    17. Minihan, Erin S. & Wu, Ziping, 2011. "The Potential Economic and Environmental Costs of GHG Mitigation Measures for Cattle Sectors in Northern Ireland," 85th Annual Conference, April 18-20, 2011, Warwick University, Coventry, UK 108779, Agricultural Economics Society.
    18. Sarath Delpachitra & Pham Van Dai, 2012. "The Determinants of TFP Growth in Middle Income Economies in ASEAN: Implication of Financial Crises," International Journal of Business and Economics, School of Management Development, Feng Chia University, Taichung, Taiwan, vol. 11(1), pages 63-88, June.
    19. Sumit Oberoi, 2019. "Dynamics of Trade Specialization and Trade Performance of ASEAN–India Free Trade Agreement," Journal of International Commerce, Economics and Policy (JICEP), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 10(01), pages 1-26, February.
    20. Hörisch, Jacob & Ortas, Eduardo & Schaltegger, Stefan & Álvarez, Igor, 2015. "Environmental effects of sustainability management tools: An empirical analysis of large companies," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 241-249.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:recore:v:103:y:2015:i:c:p:179-191. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kai Meng (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/resources-conservation-and-recycling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.