IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v233y2021ics0925527320303649.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The combined impact of stochastic and correlated activity durations and design uncertainty on project plans

Author

Listed:
  • Kaut, Michal
  • Vaagen, Hajnalka
  • Wallace, Stein W.

Abstract

Most model based studies on project uncertainty investigate a single source of uncertainty, with a dominant focus on stochastic activity durations. However, another major uncertainty facing engineering projects is that of changes in design troughout the project delivery. This may come from uncertainty in the market, technology, or regulations, leading to changes in design and implementation paths, with alterations in the project network itself. This comes on top of stochastic and correlated activity durations for a given design. In this paper we develop a stochastic program to investigate how uncertainty in design and activity durations, together, affect planning, and their relationships. The findings suggest that when design uncertainty is modelled by multiple alternatives and delayed decisions on the final alternative, stochastic and correlated activity durations have limited impact. In situations with alternative and subtitutable solutions available for a given design, correlations drive a certain learning behaviour.

Suggested Citation

  • Kaut, Michal & Vaagen, Hajnalka & Wallace, Stein W., 2021. "The combined impact of stochastic and correlated activity durations and design uncertainty on project plans," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:233:y:2021:i:c:s0925527320303649
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.108015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527320303649
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.108015?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vaagen, Hajnalka & Wallace, Stein W. & Kaut, Michal, 2011. "Modelling consumer-directed substitution," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(2), pages 388-397, December.
    2. Stijn Vonder & Erik Demeulemeester & Roel Leus & Willy Herroelen, 2006. "Proactive-Reactive Project Scheduling Trade-Offs and Procedures," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Joanna Józefowska & Jan Weglarz (ed.), Perspectives in Modern Project Scheduling, chapter 0, pages 25-51, Springer.
    3. Linet Özdamar & Ebru Alanya, 2001. "Uncertainty Modelling in Software Development Projects (With Case Study)," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 102(1), pages 157-178, February.
    4. Vaagen, Hajnalka & Wallace, Stein W., 2008. "Product variety arising from hedging in the fashion supply chains," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(2), pages 431-455, August.
    5. Creemers, Stefan & De Reyck, Bert & Leus, Roel, 2015. "Project planning with alternative technologies in uncertain environments," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 242(2), pages 465-476.
    6. Jorgensen, Trond & Wallace, Stein W., 2000. "Improving project cost estimation by taking into account managerial flexibility," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 127(2), pages 239-251, December.
    7. Luh, Peter B. & Liu, Feng & Moser, Bryan, 1999. "Scheduling of design projects with uncertain number of iterations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 113(3), pages 575-592, March.
    8. Artigues, Christian & Billaut, Jean-Charles & Esswein, Carl, 2005. "Maximization of solution flexibility for robust shop scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 165(2), pages 314-328, September.
    9. Vanhoucke, Mario & Coelho, José, 2016. "An approach using SAT solvers for the RCPSP with logical constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 249(2), pages 577-591.
    10. G Zhu & J F Bard & G Yu, 2005. "Disruption management for resource-constrained project scheduling," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 56(4), pages 365-381, April.
    11. Tore Jonsbråten & Roger Wets & David Woodruff, 1998. "A class of stochastic programs withdecision dependent random elements," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 82(0), pages 83-106, August.
    12. Herroelen, Willy & Leus, Roel, 2005. "Project scheduling under uncertainty: Survey and research potentials," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 165(2), pages 289-306, September.
    13. Michael T. Pich & Christoph H. Loch & Arnoud De Meyer, 2002. "On Uncertainty, Ambiguity, and Complexity in Project Management," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(8), pages 1008-1023, August.
    14. Avinash K. Dixit & Robert S. Pindyck, 1994. "Investment under Uncertainty," Economics Books, Princeton University Press, edition 1, number 5474.
    15. Servranckx, Tom & Vanhoucke, Mario, 2019. "A tabu search procedure for the resource-constrained project scheduling problem with alternative subgraphs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(3), pages 841-860.
    16. Simchi-Levi, David, 2010. "Operation Rules: Delivering Customer Value through Flexible Operations," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262525151, December.
    17. Arnt-Gunnar Lium & Teodor Gabriel Crainic & Stein W. Wallace, 2009. "A Study of Demand Stochasticity in Service Network Design," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(2), pages 144-157, May.
    18. Deblaere, Filip & Demeulemeester, Erik & Herroelen, Willy, 2011. "Proactive policies for the stochastic resource-constrained project scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 214(2), pages 308-316, October.
    19. Arnt-Gunnar Lium & Teodor Gabriel Crainic & Stein W. Wallace, 2007. "Correlations In Stochastic Programming: A Case From Stochastic Service Network Design," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 24(02), pages 161-179.
    20. Stefan Creemers & Bert De Reyck & Roel Leus, 2015. "Project planning with alternative technologies in uncertain environments," Post-Print hal-01563008, HAL.
    21. David Simchi-Levi & William Schmidt & Yehua Wei & Peter Yun Zhang & Keith Combs & Yao Ge & Oleg Gusikhin & Michael Sanders & Don Zhang, 2015. "Identifying Risks and Mitigating Disruptions in the Automotive Supply Chain," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 45(5), pages 375-390, October.
    22. Gunasekaran, Angappa & Ngai, Eric W.T., 2012. "The future of operations management: An outlook and analysis," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(2), pages 687-701.
    23. Arnd Huchzermeier & Christoph H. Loch, 2001. "Project Management Under Risk: Using the Real Options Approach to Evaluate Flexibility in R...D," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(1), pages 85-101, January.
    24. David Wall, 1997. "Distributions and correlations in Monte Carlo simulation," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(3), pages 241-258.
    25. Vaagen, Hajnalka & Kaut, Michal & Wallace, Stein W., 2017. "The impact of design uncertainty in engineer-to-order project planning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(3), pages 1098-1109.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hazır, Öncü & Ulusoy, Gündüz, 2020. "A classification and review of approaches and methods for modeling uncertainty in projects," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    2. Öncü Hazir & Gündüz Ulusoy, 2020. "A classification and review of approaches and methods for modeling uncertainty in projects," Post-Print hal-02898162, HAL.
    3. Vaagen, Hajnalka & Kaut, Michal & Wallace, Stein W., 2017. "The impact of design uncertainty in engineer-to-order project planning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(3), pages 1098-1109.
    4. Servranckx, Tom & Vanhoucke, Mario, 2019. "Strategies for project scheduling with alternative subgraphs under uncertainty: similar and dissimilar sets of schedules," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 279(1), pages 38-53.
    5. Aditya Vedantam & Ananth Iyer, 2021. "Capacity Investment under Bayesian Information Updates at Reporting Periods: Model and Application," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(8), pages 2707-2725, August.
    6. Bordley, Robert F. & Keisler, Jeffrey M. & Logan, Tom M., 2019. "Managing projects with uncertain deadlines," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 274(1), pages 291-302.
    7. Xiong, Jian & Leus, Roel & Yang, Zhenyu & Abbass, Hussein A., 2016. "Evolutionary multi-objective resource allocation and scheduling in the Chinese navigation satellite system project," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 251(2), pages 662-675.
    8. Brčić, Mario & Katić, Marija & Hlupić, Nikica, 2019. "Planning horizons based proactive rescheduling for stochastic resource-constrained project scheduling problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(1), pages 58-66.
    9. Hermans, Ben & Leus, Roel & Looy, Bart Van, 2023. "Deciding on scheduling, secrecy, and patenting during the new product development process: The relevance of project planning models," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    10. Wolfram Wiesemann & Daniel Kuhn & Berç Rustem, 2012. "Multi-resource allocation in stochastic project scheduling," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 193(1), pages 193-220, March.
    11. Hartmann, Sönke & Briskorn, Dirk, 2022. "An updated survey of variants and extensions of the resource-constrained project scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(1), pages 1-14.
    12. Goldstein, Anna P. & Kearney, Michael, 2020. "Know when to fold ‘em: An empirical description of risk management in public research funding," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(1).
    13. Wiesemann, Wolfram & Kuhn, Daniel & Rustem, Berç, 2010. "Maximizing the net present value of a project under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(2), pages 356-367, April.
    14. Servranckx, Tom & Vanhoucke, Mario, 2019. "A tabu search procedure for the resource-constrained project scheduling problem with alternative subgraphs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(3), pages 841-860.
    15. Balouka, Noemie & Cohen, Izack, 2021. "A robust optimization approach for the multi-mode resource-constrained project scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 291(2), pages 457-470.
    16. Creemers, Stefan, 2018. "Moments and distribution of the net present value of a serial project," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(3), pages 835-848.
    17. Morteza Davari & Erik Demeulemeester, 2019. "The proactive and reactive resource-constrained project scheduling problem," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 211-237, April.
    18. Delaney, Laura, 2021. "A model of investment under uncertainty with time to build, market incompleteness and risk aversion," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 293(3), pages 1155-1167.
    19. Moon, Yongma & Baran, Mesut, 2018. "Economic analysis of a residential PV system from the timing perspective: A real option model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 783-795.
    20. Wen, Xin & Choi, Tsan-Ming & Chung, Sai-Ho, 2019. "Fashion retail supply chain management: A review of operational models," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 34-55.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:233:y:2021:i:c:s0925527320303649. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.