IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v202y2018icp132-144.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Product design for leased products under remanufacturing

Author

Listed:
  • Steeneck, Daniel W.
  • Sarin, Subhash C.

Abstract

Due to growing regulations, competition, and a changing corporate culture, original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) are now increasing their extended producer responsibility (EPR). In this paper, we explore how this trend of EPR affects product design when an OEM decides to lease their products and then remanufacture them at the end of a lease period. In this context, we investigate the level of durability to be built into the parts of a product. Our analysis reveals that, assuming a linear cost/durability tradeoff, there are discrete durability levels for each part to select from, and that, the optimal durability level for a part depends on: (1) the quantity of products remanufactured, (2) the profit margin of remanufactured products, and (3) the recovery rate of leased products. Also, we show how our analysis can be extended to: (1) accommodate various forms of nonlinear cost/durability trade-off functions, and (2) address cannibalization of new product leases by remanufactured products.

Suggested Citation

  • Steeneck, Daniel W. & Sarin, Subhash C., 2018. "Product design for leased products under remanufacturing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 132-144.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:202:y:2018:i:c:p:132-144
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.04.025
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527318301877
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.04.025?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daniel W. Steeneck & Subhash C. Sarin, 2017. "Determining end-of-life policy for recoverable products," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(19), pages 5782-5800, October.
    2. Guo, Shanshan & Aydin, Goker & Souza, Gilvan C., 2014. "Dismantle or remanufacture?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 233(3), pages 580-583.
    3. Laurens G. Debo & L. Beril Toktay & Luk N. Van Wassenhove, 2005. "Market Segmentation and Product Technology Selection for Remanufacturable Products," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(8), pages 1193-1205, August.
    4. Pangburn, Michael S. & Stavrulaki, Euthemia, 2014. "Take back costs and product durability," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 238(1), pages 175-184.
    5. Inderfurth, K. & de Kok, A. G. & Flapper, S. D. P., 2001. "Product recovery in stochastic remanufacturing systems with multiple reuse options," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 133(1), pages 130-152, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yufei Hu & Lianghua Chen & Yingying Chi & Bowen Song, 2022. "Manufacturer encroachment on a closed‐loop supply chain with design for remanufacturing," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(6), pages 1941-1959, September.
    2. Haitao Chen & Qiang Xu & Zhaohui Dong & Hetian Zhao, 2023. "Recycling Versus Leasing in Closed-Loop Supply Chain: A Comparative Analysis Anchored on Consumer Ownership Perceptions," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.
    3. Weisheng Deng, 2019. "Does Remanufacturing Always Benefit the Manufacturer and Hurt the Supplier?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-13, March.
    4. Shuiye Niu & Honglong Zhuo & Kelei Xue, 2019. "DfRem-Driven Closed-Loop Supply Chain Decision-Making: A Systematic Framework for Modeling Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-19, June.
    5. Zheng, Xiong & Govindan, Kannan & Deng, Qianzhou & Feng, Lipan, 2019. "Effects of design for the environment on firms’ production and remanufacturing strategies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 217-228.
    6. Zheng, Yanyan & Zhao, Yingxue & Wang, Nengmin & Meng, Xiaoge & Yang, Honglin, 2022. "Financing decision for a remanufacturing supply chain with a capital constrained retailer: A study from the perspective of market uncertainty," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    7. Qixiang Wang & Xiaobo Wang, 2022. "Does Product Eco-design Promote Remanufacturing: Application of a Stylized Game-theoretic Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-20, December.
    8. Liu, Zhi & Li, Kevin W. & Li, Bang-Yi & Huang, Jun & Tang, Juan, 2019. "Impact of product-design strategies on the operations of a closed-loop supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 75-91.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Çerağ Pinçe & Mark Ferguson & Beril Toktay, 2016. "Extracting Maximum Value from Consumer Returns: Allocating Between Remarketing and Refurbishing for Warranty Claims," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 18(4), pages 475-492, October.
    2. Zhou, Wenhui & Zheng, Yanfang & Huang, Weixiang, 2017. "Competitive advantage of qualified WEEE recyclers through EPR legislation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 257(2), pages 641-655.
    3. Ferguson, M. & Fleischmann, M. & Souza, G.C., 2008. "Applying Revenue Management to the Reverse Supply Chain," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2008-052-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    4. Yan, Wei & Xiong, Yu & Xiong, Zhongkai & Guo, Nian, 2015. "Bricks vs. clicks: Which is better for marketing remanufactured products?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 242(2), pages 434-444.
    5. Pokharel, Shaligram & Mutha, Akshay, 2009. "Perspectives in reverse logistics: A review," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 53(4), pages 175-182.
    6. Liu, Zhi & Li, Kevin W. & Li, Bang-Yi & Huang, Jun & Tang, Juan, 2019. "Impact of product-design strategies on the operations of a closed-loop supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 75-91.
    7. Liu, Wenjie & Liu, Wei & Shen, Ningning & Xu, Zhitao & Xie, Naiming & Chen, Jian & Zhou, Huiyu, 2022. "Pricing and collection decisions of a closed-loop supply chain with fuzzy demand," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    8. Qingyuan Zhu & Chenghao Yu & Zhiyang SHEN & Malin Song, 2023. "Competition between a manufacturer and a relicensing third party when customers are strategic," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(4), pages 2021-2040, June.
    9. Erzurumlu, S. Sinan, 2013. "The compatibility of durable goods with contingent generic consumables," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 574-585.
    10. Ying Wu & Youwei Li, 2022. "Competition or Authorization—Manufacturers’ Choice of Remanufacturing Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-29, October.
    11. Berthon, Pierre & Pitt, Leyland F. & Campbell, Colin, 2009. "Does brand meaning exist in similarity or singularity?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(3), pages 356-361, March.
    12. Chung, Sung H. & Weaver, Robert D. & Friesz, Terry L., 2013. "Strategic response to pollution taxes in supply chain networks: Dynamic, spatial, and organizational dimensions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 231(2), pages 314-327.
    13. Niknejad, A. & Petrovic, D., 2014. "Optimisation of integrated reverse logistics networks with different product recovery routes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 238(1), pages 143-154.
    14. Yenipazarli, Arda, 2016. "Managing new and remanufactured products to mitigate environmental damage under emissions regulation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 249(1), pages 117-130.
    15. Ramani, Vinay & De Giovanni, Pietro, 2017. "A two-period model of product cannibalization in an atypical Closed-loop Supply Chain with endogenous returns: The case of DellReconnect," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 262(3), pages 1009-1027.
    16. He, Qidong & Wang, Nengmin & Browning, Tyson R. & Jiang, Bin, 2022. "Competitive collection with convenience-perceived customers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(1), pages 239-254.
    17. De Giovanni, Pietro & Zaccour, Georges, 2014. "A two-period game of a closed-loop supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 232(1), pages 22-40.
    18. Gunasekara, Lahiru & Robb, David J. & Zhang, Abraham, 2023. "Used product acquisition, sorting and disposition for circular supply chains: Literature review and research directions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    19. Roland Geyer & Luk N. Van Wassenhove & Atalay Atasu, 2007. "The Economics of Remanufacturing Under Limited Component Durability and Finite Product Life Cycles," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(1), pages 88-100, January.
    20. Guo, Shanshan & Aydin, Goker & Souza, Gilvan C., 2014. "Dismantle or remanufacture?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 233(3), pages 580-583.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:202:y:2018:i:c:p:132-144. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.