IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v147y2014ipcp624-633.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Supply chain practice and information quality: A supply chain strategy study

Author

Listed:
  • Zhou, Honggeng
  • Shou, Yongyi
  • Zhai, Xin
  • Li, Ling
  • Wood, Craig
  • Wu, Xiaobo

Abstract

There is a wide acceptance of the strategic importance of integrating up-to-date information technology with effective supply chain practice. However, little is known about how the alignment between information technology and supply chain practice impacts business performance. This paper investigates two supply chain practices (i.e. sourcing practice and delivery practice) and information quality. Scales measuring sourcing practice, delivery practice, and information quality were developed. Four strategic clusters of companies, using alternative supply chain strategies, are identified. In three of the strategic clusters, the level of supply chain practice is consistent with the level of information quality. The fourth strategic cluster has a high level of information quality but a low level of effective supply chain practices. In this study, the fourth strategic cluster performed consistently worse than the other three strategic clusters. The performance measures consist of sales revenue and profitability. This study shows that firms need to align supply chain practice with the level of their information quality in order to achieve good overall business performance. Implications of our findings and future research opportunities are addressed.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhou, Honggeng & Shou, Yongyi & Zhai, Xin & Li, Ling & Wood, Craig & Wu, Xiaobo, 2014. "Supply chain practice and information quality: A supply chain strategy study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(PC), pages 624-633.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:147:y:2014:i:pc:p:624-633
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.08.025
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527313003836
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.08.025?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James G. March, 1991. "Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 2(1), pages 71-87, February.
    2. Jeffrey G. Miller & Aleda V. Roth, 1994. "A Taxonomy of Manufacturing Strategies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(3), pages 285-304, March.
    3. A Harrison & C New, 2002. "The role of coherent supply chain strategy and performance management in achieving competitive advantage: an international survey," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 53(3), pages 263-271, March.
    4. Roth, Aleda V. & Miller, Jeffrey G., 1992. "Success factors in manufacturing," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 73-81.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. G. Denisse Chamochumbi D. & Massimo Ciambotti & Federica Palazzi & Francesca Sgr?, 2022. "The digital transformation process in the agri-food sector: A case study," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2022(2 Suppl.), pages 43-70.
    2. Han, Jeong Hugh & Wang, Yingli & Naim, Mohamed, 2017. "Reconceptualization of information technology flexibility for supply chain management: An empirical study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 196-215.
    3. Tan, Kim Hua & Zhan, YuanZhu & Ji, Guojun & Ye, Fei & Chang, Chingter, 2015. "Harvesting big data to enhance supply chain innovation capabilities: An analytic infrastructure based on deduction graph," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 223-233.
    4. Kozarević, Safet & Puška, Adis, 2018. "Use of fuzzy logic for measuring practices and performances of supply chain," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 5(C), pages 150-160.
    5. Rok Lee, 2021. "The Effect of Supply Chain Management Strategy on Operational and Financial Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-18, May.
    6. Wu, Ing-Long & Chiu, Mai-Lun, 2018. "Examining supply chain collaboration with determinants and performance impact: Social capital, justice, and technology use perspectives," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 5-19.
    7. Perez-Franco, R. & Phadnis, S. & Caplice, C. & Sheffi, Y., 2016. "Rethinking supply chain strategy as a conceptual system," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 384-396.
    8. Changjoon Lee & Byoung-Chun Ha, 2021. "Interactional Justice, Informational Quality, and Sustainable Supply Chain Management: A Comparison of Domestic and Multinational Pharmaceutical Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-16, January.
    9. Mahdavi, Mojtaba & Olsen, Tava Lennon, 2017. "Designing Effective Supply Chains in Strategic Alignment with Demand Characteristics and Market Requirements," Foundations and Trends(R) in Technology, Information and Operations Management, now publishers, vol. 10(2), pages 89-208, June.
    10. Araneda-Fuentes, Cristina & Lustosa, Leonardo Junqueira & Minner, Stefan, 2015. "A contract for coordinating capacity decisions in a business-to-business (B2B) supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 158-171.
    11. Shou, Yongyi & Zhao, Xinyu & Dai, Jing & Xu, Dong, 2021. "Matching traceability and supply chain coordination: Achieving operational innovation for superior performance," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    12. Li Da Xu, 2020. "The contribution of systems science to Industry 4.0," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(4), pages 618-631, July.
    13. Szilvia Botos & Róbert Szilágyi & János Felföldi & Mihály Tóth, 2020. "Readiness for ICT Based B2C Information Flow – Case Study of the Hungarian Food Sector," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 12(2), June.
    14. Sen, Sandipan & Savitskie, Katrina & Mahto, Raj V. & Kumar, Sampath & Khanine, Dmitry, 2022. "If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it? Indian manufacturing SMEs’ quest for strategic flexibility," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 27-35.
    15. Chen Shieh-Liang & Nguyen Thi Huyen Tran & Nguyen Thi Thu Ha, 2016. "Concerns of Vietnamese Producing-exporting Seafood SMEs (VPESSMEs) on Supply Chain," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(6), pages 120-130, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aleksandras Vytautas Rutkauskas & Aleksandr Ostapenko, 2016. "Return, reliability and risk as a proactive set of concepts in developing an efficient integration strategy of companies," Journal of Business Economics and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(2), pages 201-214, April.
    2. Xinwei Li & Wenjuan Zeng & Mao Xu, 2022. "The Moderating Role of IT Capability on Green Innovation and Ambidexterity: Towards a Corporate Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-20, December.
    3. Zhang, Xiang & Ye, Chen & Chen, Rongqiu & Wang, Zhaohua, 2011. "Multi-focused strategy in value co-creation with customers: Examining cumulative development pattern with new capabilities," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(1), pages 122-130, July.
    4. Tomás F. Espino-Rodríguez, 2016. "How hotels compete on the basis of competitive priorities and their relationship with infrastructural and structural decisions," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 10(4), pages 737-773, December.
    5. Aleda V. Roth, 2007. "Applications of Empirical Science in Manufacturing and Service Operations," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 9(4), pages 353-367.
    6. Pacheco, Diego Augusto de Jesus & Antunes Junior, José Antonio Valle & de Matos, Celso Augusto, 2021. "The constraints of theory: What is the impact of the Theory of Constraints on Operations Strategy?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    7. L. M. Daphne Yiu & Hugo K. S. Lam & Andy C. L. Yeung & T. C. E. Cheng, 2020. "Enhancing the Financial Returns of R&D Investments through Operations Management," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(7), pages 1658-1678, July.
    8. Lau Antonio, K.W. & Yam, Richard C.M. & Tang, Esther, 2007. "The impacts of product modularity on competitive capabilities and performance: An empirical study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(1), pages 1-20, January.
    9. Mishra, Deepa Bhatt & Haider, Imran & Gunasekaran, Angappa & Sakib, Md. Nazmus & Malik, Nishtha & Rana, Nripendra P., 2023. "“Better together”: Right blend of business strategy and digital transformation strategies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    10. Ng, Stephen C.H. & Rungtusanatham, Johnny M. & Zhao, Xiande & Lee, T.S., 2015. "Examining process management via the lens of exploitation and exploration: Reconceptualization and scale development," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 1-15.
    11. Singh, Nitya P. & Hong, Paul C., 2020. "Impact of strategic and operational risk management practices on firm performance: An empirical investigation," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(5), pages 723-735.
    12. Su, Hung-Chung & Chen, Yi-Su, 2013. "Unpacking the relationships between learning mechanisms, culture types, and plant performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(2), pages 728-737.
    13. Hausman, Warren H. & Montgomery, David B. & Roth, Aleda V., 2000. "Exploring the Impact of Marketing and Manufacturing Strategies, Conflict, and Morale on Business Performance," Research Papers 1620, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    14. Avella, Lucia & Fernandez, Esteban & Vazquez, Camilo J., 2001. "Analysis of manufacturing strategy as an explanatory factor of competitiveness in the large Spanish industrial firm," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(2), pages 139-157, July.
    15. Shekhar Jayanthi & Aleda V. Roth & Mehmet M. Kristal & Lauren Carter-Roth Venu, 2009. "Strategic Resource Dynamics of Manufacturing Firms," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(6), pages 1060-1076, June.
    16. Revilla, Elena & Villena, Verónica H., 2012. "Knowledge integration taxonomy in buyer–supplier relationships: Trade-offs between efficiency and innovation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(2), pages 854-864.
    17. Lii, Peirchyi & Kuo, Fang-I, 2016. "Innovation-oriented supply chain integration for combined competitiveness and firm performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 142-155.
    18. Arman Avadikyan & Gilles Lambert & Christophe Lerch, 2016. "A Multi-Level Perspective on Ambidexterity: The Case of a Synchrotron Research Facility," Working Papers of BETA 2016-44, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    19. Henri A. Schildt & Markku V.J. Maula & Thomas Keil, 2005. "Explorative and Exploitative Learning from External Corporate Ventures," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 29(4), pages 493-515, July.
    20. Giuliani, Elisa & Martinelli, Arianna & Rabellotti, Roberta, 2016. "Is Co-Invention Expediting Technological Catch Up? A Study of Collaboration between Emerging Country Firms and EU Inventors," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 192-205.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:147:y:2014:i:pc:p:624-633. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.