IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v144y2013i1p223-242.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An approach based on constraint satisfaction problems to disruptive event management in supply chains

Author

Listed:
  • Guarnaschelli, Armando
  • Chiotti, Omar
  • Salomone, Hector E.

Abstract

This work introduces a generalized model for evaluating and restoring feasibility in the execution of supply chain processes. The model was designed to provide automation to the disruption management function of Supply Chain Event Management (SCEM) systems. The repair mechanism is based on a constraint satisfaction problem that can be automatically instantiated from self-contained descriptions of the ongoing schedules without previous knowledge of the supply chain structure. The proposed mechanism intends to make surgical modifications to the current schedule which do not affect the economical and operational considerations and the allowed changes are limited to the space of slacks already included by the original schedule. This level of repair can be safely delegated to automated systems and would facilitate the design of collaborative inter-organizational business processes to manage events along the supply chain. A case study validates the applicability of the proposed models.

Suggested Citation

  • Guarnaschelli, Armando & Chiotti, Omar & Salomone, Hector E., 2013. "An approach based on constraint satisfaction problems to disruptive event management in supply chains," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(1), pages 223-242.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:144:y:2013:i:1:p:223-242
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.02.007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527313000741
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.02.007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Li, Jing-Quan & Mirchandani, Pitu B. & Borenstein, Denis, 2009. "A Lagrangian heuristic for the real-time vehicle rescheduling problem," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 419-433, May.
    2. Koh, S.C. Lenny & Saad, Sameh M., 2006. "Managing uncertainty in ERP-controlled manufacturing environments in SMEs," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(1), pages 109-127, May.
    3. Cauvin, A.C.A. & Ferrarini, A.F.A. & Tranvouez, E.T.E., 2009. "Disruption management in distributed enterprises: A multi-agent modelling and simulation of cooperative recovery behaviours," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(1), pages 429-439, November.
    4. Li, Jing-Quan & Mirchandani, Pitu B. & Borenstein, Denis, 2009. "Real-time vehicle rerouting problems with time windows," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 194(3), pages 711-727, May.
    5. Aytug, Haldun & Lawley, Mark A. & McKay, Kenneth & Mohan, Shantha & Uzsoy, Reha, 2005. "Executing production schedules in the face of uncertainties: A review and some future directions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 161(1), pages 86-110, February.
    6. Tang, Christopher S., 2006. "Perspectives in supply chain risk management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(2), pages 451-488, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Xuping & Ruan, Junhu & Shi, Yan, 2012. "A recovery model for combinational disruptions in logistics delivery: Considering the real-world participators," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(1), pages 508-520.
    2. Ahmadi-Javid, Amir & Seddighi, Amir Hossein, 2013. "A location-routing problem with disruption risk," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 63-82.
    3. Pillac, Victor & Gendreau, Michel & Guéret, Christelle & Medaglia, Andrés L., 2013. "A review of dynamic vehicle routing problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 225(1), pages 1-11.
    4. Bearzotti, Lorena A. & Salomone, Enrique & Chiotti, Omar J., 2012. "An autonomous multi-agent approach to supply chain event management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(1), pages 468-478.
    5. Jafarian, Ahmad & Asgari, Nasrin & Mohri, Seyed Sina & Fatemi-Sadr, Elham & Farahani, Reza Zanjirani, 2019. "The inventory-routing problem subject to vehicle failure," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 254-294.
    6. Q Mu & Z Fu & J Lysgaard & R Eglese, 2011. "Disruption management of the vehicle routing problem with vehicle breakdown," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 62(4), pages 742-749, April.
    7. Ozbaygin, Gizem & Savelsbergh, Martin, 2019. "An iterative re-optimization framework for the dynamic vehicle routing problem with roaming delivery locations," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 207-235.
    8. Jie Wu & Zhixin Chen & Xiang Ji, 2020. "Sustainable trade promotion decisions under demand disruption in manufacturer-retailer supply chains," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 290(1), pages 115-143, July.
    9. Altekin, F. Tevhide & Bukchin, Yossi, 2022. "A multi-objective optimization approach for exploring the cost and makespan trade-off in additive manufacturing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 301(1), pages 235-253.
    10. Alexey Matveev & Varvara Feoktistova & Ksenia Bolshakova, 2016. "On Global Near Optimality of Special Periodic Protocols for Fluid Polling Systems with Setups," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 171(3), pages 1055-1070, December.
    11. Tang, Liang & Jing, Ke & He, Jie & Stanley, H. Eugene, 2016. "Robustness of assembly supply chain networks by considering risk propagation and cascading failure," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 459(C), pages 129-139.
    12. Zhao, Na, 2019. "Managing interactive collaborative mega project supply chains under infectious risks," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 275-286.
    13. Boulaksil, Youssef, 2016. "Safety stock placement in supply chains with demand forecast updates," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 3(C), pages 27-31.
    14. Hassan Arabshahi & Hamed Fazlollahtabar, 2018. "Classifying Innovative Activities Using Decision Tree and Gini Index," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(03), pages 1-14, June.
    15. Li, Yongjian & Zhen, Xueping & Qi, Xiangtong & Cai, Gangshu (George), 2016. "Penalty and financial assistance in a supply chain with supply disruption," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 167-181.
    16. Seyyed Mohammad Seyyed Alizadeh Ganji & Mohammad Hayati, 2016. "Identifying and Assessing the Risks in the Supply Chain," Modern Applied Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(6), pages 1-74, June.
    17. Laurent Lim, Lâm & Alpan, Gülgün & Penz, Bernard, 2014. "Reconciling sales and operations management with distant suppliers in the automotive industry: A simulation approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 20-36.
    18. Qazi, Abroon & Dickson, Alex & Quigley, John & Gaudenzi, Barbara, 2018. "Supply chain risk network management: A Bayesian belief network and expected utility based approach for managing supply chain risks," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 24-42.
    19. Dmitry Ivanov, 2022. "Viable supply chain model: integrating agility, resilience and sustainability perspectives—lessons from and thinking beyond the COVID-19 pandemic," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 319(1), pages 1411-1431, December.
    20. Mazur, Christoph & Hoegerle, Yannick & Brucoli, Maria & van Dam, Koen & Guo, Miao & Markides, Christos N. & Shah, Nilay, 2019. "A holistic resilience framework development for rural power systems in emerging economies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C), pages 219-232.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:144:y:2013:i:1:p:223-242. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.