IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/phsmap/v535y2019ics0378437119305308.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The strength distribution and combined duration prediction of online collective actions: Big data analysis and BP neural networks

Author

Listed:
  • Lu, Peng
  • Nie, Shizhao

Abstract

Unveiling the patterns and mechanisms of human behaviors is the core task of collective action studies. In terms of the strength (impacts or power) of collective actions, some of them have bigger political influences or societal impacts than others, and the success chance or probability therefore varies a great deal. Some online collective actions have little effects or favorable outcomes, while others have successfully changed policies or decisions made by local or central governments; and others even overthrow the governments. Hence, the indicator of strength is applied to measure the powers, pressures, attentions, concerns, and impacts generated by certain collective actions. The strength of collective action is defined and calculated by the life function, i.e. it is defined as the summation or integral of life function (viability or total participation) divided by the durations or spans. There exists some regularity in terms of the strength’s distribution under both simulations and big data exploration. The peak model is utilized to simulate online collective actions, and the distribution of strength (N=1000) is close to normal distributions; it indicates by the observed big data cases (N=159) that it follows the lognormal distribution, which also holds true for subgroups. The introduction of strength paves the way for predicting the durations or spans of online collective actions. For the combined prediction with three factors (peak’s timing, peak’s heights, and viability), the accuracy of predicting durations or spans is close to 100% for both simulated data and observed big data. For separate predictions with single factor, the accuracy is closer to 100% as well.

Suggested Citation

  • Lu, Peng & Nie, Shizhao, 2019. "The strength distribution and combined duration prediction of online collective actions: Big data analysis and BP neural networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 535(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:phsmap:v:535:y:2019:i:c:s0378437119305308
    DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2019.04.267
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378437119305308
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only. Journal offers the option of making the article available online on Science direct for a fee of $3,000
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.physa.2019.04.267?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Beitl, Christine M., 2014. "Adding Environment to the Collective Action Problem: Individuals, Civil Society, and the Mangrove-Fishery Commons in Ecuador," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 93-107.
    2. Michael Jones-Correa & Sophia J. Wallace & Chris Zepeda-Millán, 2016. "The Impact of Large-Scale Collective Action on Latino Perceptions of Commonality and Competition with African Americans," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 97(2), pages 458-475, June.
    3. Candelaria Garay, 2007. "Social Policy and Collective Action: Unemployed Workers, Community Associations, and Protest in Argentina," Politics & Society, , vol. 35(2), pages 301-328, June.
    4. Philippe Koch, 2013. "Bringing Power Back In: Collective and Distributive Forms of Power in Public Participation," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 50(14), pages 2976-2992, November.
    5. Pierre Monforte & Pascale Dufour, 2011. "Mobilizing in Borderline Citizenship Regimes: A Comparative Analysis of Undocumented Migrants’ Collective Actions," Politics & Society, , vol. 39(2), pages 203-232, June.
    6. Patricia Justino, 2009. "Poverty and Violent Conflict: A Micro-Level Perspective on the Causes and Duration of Warfare," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 46(3), pages 315-333, May.
    7. Lu, Peng, 2015. "Individual choice and reputation distribution of cooperative behaviors among heterogeneous groups," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 39-46.
    8. Lu, Peng & Wang, Fang, 2015. "Heterogeneity of inferring reputation probability in cooperative behaviors for the spatial prisoners’ dilemma game," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 433(C), pages 367-378.
    9. Helen Z. Margetts & Peter John & Scott A. Hale & Stéphane Reissfelder, 2015. "Leadership without Leaders? Starters and Followers in Online Collective Action," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 63(2), pages 277-277, June.
    10. Joyce Mandell, 2010. "Picnics, participation and power: linking community building to social change," Community Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(2), pages 269-282, April.
    11. Thomas Markussen & Louis Putterman & Jean-Robert Tyran, 2014. "Self-Organization for Collective Action: An Experimental Study of Voting on Sanction Regimes," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 81(1), pages 301-324.
    12. McAndrews, Carolyn & Marcus, Justine, 2015. "The politics of collective public participation in transportation decision-making," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 537-550.
    13. Lu, Peng, 2015. "Imitating winner or sympathizing loser? Quadratic effects on cooperative behavior in prisoners’ dilemma games," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 436(C), pages 327-337.
    14. Simon A. Andrew & Kyujin Jung & Xiangyu Li, 2015. "Grass-Root Organisations, Intergovernmental Collaboration, and Emergency Preparedness: An Institutional Collective Action Approach," Local Government Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(5), pages 673-694, September.
    15. Lu, Peng, 2016. "Predicting peak of participants in collective action," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 274(C), pages 318-330.
    16. Helen Z. Margetts & Peter John & Scott A. Hale & Stéphane Reissfelder, 2015. "Leadership without Leaders? Starters and Followers in Online Collective Action," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 63(2), pages 278-299, June.
    17. Tawakkol Karman, 2013. "The Expanding Arab Spring*," Development, Palgrave Macmillan;Society for International Deveopment, vol. 56(3), pages 432-433, September.
    18. Huang, Haifeng, 2017. "A War of (Mis)Information: The Political Effects of Rumors and Rumor Rebuttals in an Authoritarian Country," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 47(2), pages 283-311, April.
    19. Lin Wang & Xiang Li & Yi-Qing Zhang & Yan Zhang & Kan Zhang, 2011. "Evolution of Scaling Emergence in Large-Scale Spatial Epidemic Spreading," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(7), pages 1-11, July.
    20. Lin Wang & Joseph T. Wu, 2018. "Characterizing the dynamics underlying global spread of epidemics," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 9(1), pages 1-11, December.
    21. Lu, Peng, 2015. "Learn good from bad: Effects of good and bad neighbors in spatial prisoners’ dilemma games," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 436(C), pages 351-358.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lu, Peng & Yao, Qi & Lu, Pengfei, 2019. "Two-stage predictions of evolutionary dynamics during the rumor dissemination," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 517(C), pages 349-369.
    2. Quan, Ji & Tang, Caixia & Wang, Xianjia, 2021. "Reputation-based discount effect in imitation on the evolution of cooperation in spatial public goods games," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 563(C).
    3. Lu, Peng, 2016. "Predicting peak of participants in collective action," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 274(C), pages 318-330.
    4. Brigitte Huber & Manuel Goyanes & Homero Gil de Zúñiga, 2021. "Linking Extraversion to Collective and Individual Forms of Political Participation: The Mediating Role of Political Discussion," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 102(4), pages 1289-1310, July.
    5. Vincent Pasquier & Alex J Wood, 2018. "The power of social media as a labour campaigning tool: lessons from OUR Walmart and the Fight for 15," Post-Print hal-01903758, HAL.
    6. Quan, Ji & Tang, Caixia & Zhou, Yawen & Wang, Xianjia & Yang, Jian-Bo, 2020. "Reputation evaluation with tolerance and reputation-dependent imitation on cooperation in spatial public goods game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    7. Helen Briassoulis, 2021. "Becoming E-Petition: An Assemblage-Based Framework for Analysis and Research," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(1), pages 21582440211, March.
    8. Astrid Dannenberg & Carlo Gallier, 2020. "The choice of institutions to solve cooperation problems: a survey of experimental research," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 23(3), pages 716-749, September.
    9. Pierfrancesco Rolla & Patricia Justino, 2022. "The social consequences of organized crime in Italy," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2022-106, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    10. Fatema, Naureen, 2019. "Can land title reduce low-intensity interhousehold conflict incidences and associated damages in eastern DRC?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 1-1.
    11. Mariska JM Bottema & Simon R Bush & Peter Oosterveer, 2021. "Territories of state-led aquaculture risk management: Thailand’s Plang Yai program," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 39(6), pages 1231-1251, September.
    12. Phu Nguyen-Van & Anne Stenger & Tuyen Tiet, 2021. "Social incentive factors in interventions promoting sustainable behaviors: A meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(12), pages 1-27, December.
    13. Nicklisch, Andreas & Grechenig, Kristoffel & Thöni, Christian, 2016. "Information-sensitive Leviathans," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 1-13.
    14. Kenju Kamei & Thomas Markussen, 2023. "Free Riding and Workplace Democracy—Heterogeneous Task Preferences and Sorting," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(7), pages 3884-3904, July.
    15. Ramalingam, Abhijit & Godoy, Sara & Morales, Antonio J. & Walker, James M., 2016. "An individualistic approach to institution formation in public good games," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 18-36.
    16. Fluet, Claude & Galbiati, Rpbertp, 2016. "Lois et normes : les enseignements de l'économie comportementale," L'Actualité Economique, Société Canadienne de Science Economique, vol. 92(1-2), pages 191-215, Mars-Juin.
    17. Pan, Ya-Nan & Lou, Jing-Jing & Han, Xiao-Pu, 2014. "Outbreak patterns of the novel avian influenza (H7N9)," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 401(C), pages 265-270.
    18. Columbus, Simon & Feld, Lars P. & Kasper, Matthias & Rablen, Matthew D., 2023. "Behavioural Responses to Unfair Institutions: Experimental Evidence on Rule Compliance, Norm Polarisation, and Trust," IZA Discussion Papers 16346, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    19. Patricia Justino & Olga Shemyakina, 2012. "Remittances and labor supply in post-conflict Tajikistan," IZA Journal of Labor & Development, Springer;Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit GmbH (IZA), vol. 1(1), pages 1-28, December.
    20. Gangadharan, Lata & Nikiforakis, Nikos & Villeval, Marie Claire, 2017. "Normative conflict and the limits of self-governance in heterogeneous populations," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 143-156.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:phsmap:v:535:y:2019:i:c:s0378437119305308. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/physica-a-statistical-mechpplications/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.