IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v99y2020ics0264837720309078.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

University and innovation district symbiosis in the context of placemaking: Insights from Australian cities

Author

Listed:
  • Pancholi, Surabhi
  • Yigitcanlar, Tan
  • Guaralda, Mirko
  • Mayere, Severine
  • Caldwell, Glenda Amayo
  • Medland, Richard

Abstract

Innovation districts are a new land-use type, where public and private actors work towards fostering, attracting, and retaining investment and talent to revitalise urban areas and boost knowledge/innovation economy activities. Developing innovation districts has become a popular urban strategy across the globe. They are often co-located with universities to act as a critical anchor in their socio-spatial and operational matrices. Despite the role of universities in the knowledge/innovation economy being researched extensively, university and innovation district symbiosis, particularly in the context of placemaking, is an understudied area of research. This paper aims to investigate the socio-cultural role played by anchor universities in facilitating placemaking in innovation districts. The study adopts a qualitative approach to analyse how stakeholders perceive Australian innovation districts. The findings reveal that: (a) Universities play pivotal roles as facilitators of placemaking through societal integration in innovation districts; (b) Universities act as platforms for collaboration and exchange of knowledge by adopting extroverted and collaborative approaches; (c) Universities help in developing a sense of trust within the community and establishing innovation districts as democratic, cohesive and prosperous localities; (d) Universities contribute to socio-cultural and organisational maturity of innovation districts.

Suggested Citation

  • Pancholi, Surabhi & Yigitcanlar, Tan & Guaralda, Mirko & Mayere, Severine & Caldwell, Glenda Amayo & Medland, Richard, 2020. "University and innovation district symbiosis in the context of placemaking: Insights from Australian cities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:99:y:2020:i:c:s0264837720309078
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105109
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837720309078
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105109?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paula Casaleiro, 2011. "Changing from a univer(s)city to a knowledge city: the case of Coimbra," International Journal of Knowledge-Based Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(2), pages 166-184.
    2. Esmaeilpoorarabi, Niusha & Yigitcanlar, Tan & Guaralda, Mirko & Kamruzzaman, Md., 2018. "Evaluating place quality in innovation districts: A Delphic hierarchy process approach," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 471-486.
    3. Youtie, Jan & Shapira, Philip, 2008. "Building an innovation hub: A case study of the transformation of university roles in regional technological and economic development," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(8), pages 1188-1204, September.
    4. Esmaeilpoorarabi, Niusha & Yigitcanlar, Tan & Guaralda, Mirko & Kamruzzaman, Md., 2018. "Does place quality matter for innovation districts? Determining the essential place characteristics from Brisbane’s knowledge precincts," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 734-747.
    5. Yuehua Zhang, 2005. "The science park phenomenon: development, evolution and typology," International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 5(1/2), pages 138-154.
    6. Alexandra C. Den Heijer & Flavia T.J. Curvelo Magdaniel, 2012. "The university campus as a knowledge city: exploring models and strategic choices," International Journal of Knowledge-Based Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 3(3), pages 283-304.
    7. Arnault Morisson & Carmelina Bevilacqua, 2019. "Balancing gentrification in the knowledge economy: the case of Chattanooga’s innovation district," Urban Research & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(4), pages 472-492, October.
    8. Aldieri, Luigi & Kotsemir, Maxim & Vinci, Concetto Paolo, 2018. "The impact of research collaboration on academic performance: An empirical analysis for some European countries," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 13-30.
    9. Phillip Phan & Donald S. Siegel & Mike Wright, 2016. "Science Parks and Incubators: Observations, Synthesis and Future Research," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Phillip H Phan & Sarfraz A Mian & Wadid Lamine (ed.), TECHNOLOGY ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND BUSINESS INCUBATION Theory • Practice • Lessons Learned, chapter 9, pages 249-272, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    10. JinHyo Joseph Yun & Xiaofei Zhao & Tan Yigitcanlar & DooSeok Lee & HeungJu Ahn, 2018. "Architectural Design and Open Innovation Symbiosis: Insights from Research Campuses, Manufacturing Systems, and Innovation Districts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-23, November.
    11. Yigitcanlar, Tan & Adu-McVie, Rosemary & Erol, Isil, 2020. "How can contemporary innovation districts be classified? A systematic review of the literature," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    12. Scott Hawken & Jung Hoon Han, 2017. "Innovation districts and urban heterogeneity: 3D mapping of industry mix in downtown Sydney," Journal of Urban Design, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(5), pages 568-590, September.
    13. Tan Yigitcanlar & Ingi Runar Edvardsson & Hjalti Johannesson & Md Kamruzzaman & Giuseppe Ioppolo & Surabhi Pancholi, 2017. "Knowledge-based development dynamics in less favoured regions: insights from Australian and Icelandic university towns," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(12), pages 2272-2292, December.
    14. Esmaeilpoorarabi, Niusha & Yigitcanlar, Tan & Kamruzzaman, Md. & Guaralda, Mirko, 2020. "Conceptual frameworks of innovation district place quality: An opinion paper," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    15. Arie Romein & Ana Maria Fernandez-Maldonado & Jan Jacob Trip, 2011. "Delft blues: the long road from university town to knowledge city," International Journal of Knowledge-Based Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(2), pages 148-165.
    16. Paul Benneworth & Tiago Ratinho, 2014. "Reframing the Role of Knowledge Parks and Science Cities in Knowledge-Based Urban Development," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 32(5), pages 784-808, October.
    17. Klaus Brake & Celina Kress, 2011. "Concepts of pride, brand, and communication: architecture, urban design, and knowledge production: Berlin from 1810 to 2010," International Journal of Knowledge-Based Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(2), pages 220-246.
    18. Tan Yigitcanlar & Mirko Guaralda & Manuela Taboada & Surabhi Pancholi, 2016. "Place Making for Knowledge Generation and Innovation: Planning and Branding Brisbane's Knowledge Community Precincts," Journal of Urban Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(1), pages 115-146, January.
    19. Harvey Goldstein & Karin Glaser, 2012. "Research universities as actors in the governance of local and regional development," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 37(2), pages 158-174, April.
    20. Surabhi Pancholi & Tan Yigitcanlar & Mirko Guaralda, 2018. "Attributes of successful place-making in knowledge and innovation spaces: evidence from Brisbane’s Diamantina knowledge precinct," Journal of Urban Design, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(5), pages 693-711, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gaspare D’Amico & Roberta Arbolino & Lei Shi & Tan Yigitcanlar & Giuseppe Ioppolo, 2021. "Digital Technologies for Urban Metabolism Efficiency: Lessons from Urban Agenda Partnership on Circular Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-23, May.
    2. D’Amico, Gaspare & Arbolino, Roberta & Shi, Lei & Yigitcanlar, Tan & Ioppolo, Giuseppe, 2022. "Digitalisation driven urban metabolism circularity: A review and analysis of circular city initiatives," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    3. Adu-McVie, Rosemary & Yigitcanlar, Tan & Erol, Isil & Xia, Bo, 2021. "Classifying innovation districts: Delphi validation of a multidimensional framework," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    4. Mirko Guaralda & Greg Hearn & Marcus Foth & Tan Yigitcanlar & Severine Mayere & Lisa Law, 2020. "Towards Australian Regional Turnaround: Insights into Sustainably Accommodating Post-Pandemic Urban Growth in Regional Towns and Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-13, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yigitcanlar, Tan & Adu-McVie, Rosemary & Erol, Isil, 2020. "How can contemporary innovation districts be classified? A systematic review of the literature," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    2. Adu-McVie, Rosemary & Yigitcanlar, Tan & Erol, Isil & Xia, Bo, 2021. "Classifying innovation districts: Delphi validation of a multidimensional framework," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    3. Tan Yigitcanlar & Ingi Runar Edvardsson & Hjalti Johannesson & Md Kamruzzaman & Giuseppe Ioppolo & Surabhi Pancholi, 2017. "Knowledge-based development dynamics in less favoured regions: insights from Australian and Icelandic university towns," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(12), pages 2272-2292, December.
    4. Jiwu Wang & Chengyu Tong & Xuewei Hu, 2021. "Policy Zoning Method for Innovation Districts to Sustainably Develop the Knowledge-Economy: A Case Study in Hangzhou, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-19, March.
    5. Yue Wu & Yue Yang & Weishun Xu & Qiuxiao Chen, 2020. "The Influence of Innovation Resources in Higher Education Institutions on the Development of Sci-Tech Parks’ Enterprises in the Urban Innovative Districts at the Stage of Urbanization Transformation," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-36, October.
    6. JinHyo Joseph Yun & Xiaofei Zhao & Tan Yigitcanlar & DooSeok Lee & HeungJu Ahn, 2018. "Architectural Design and Open Innovation Symbiosis: Insights from Research Campuses, Manufacturing Systems, and Innovation Districts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-23, November.
    7. Kangmin Wu & Yang Wang & Yuyao Ye & Hongou Zhang & Guangqing Huang, 2019. "Relationship Between the Built Environment and the Location Choice of High-Tech Firms: Evidence from the Pearl River Delta," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-21, July.
    8. Valérie Revest & Alessandro Sapio, 2012. "Financing technology-based small firms in Europe: what do we know?," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 39(1), pages 179-205, July.
    9. Laura Lecluyse & Mirjam Knockaert & André Spithoven, 2019. "The contribution of science parks: a literature review and future research agenda," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 44(2), pages 559-595, April.
    10. Laura Lecluyse & Mirjam Knockaert & Annelore Huyghe, 2023. "It is not because it is offered that it is used: an investigation into firm-level determinants of use intensity of buffering services in science parks," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 61(1), pages 85-104, June.
    11. Mehrjerdi, Mahsa Fallah & Hosseini, Ali, 2020. "Opinion on “Does place quality matter for innovation districts? Determining the essential place characteristics from Brisbane’s knowledge precincts”," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    12. Youwei Tan & Qinglan Qian & Xiaolan Chen, 2023. "Empirical Evaluation of the Impact of Informal Communication Space Quality on Innovation in Innovation Districts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-16, March.
    13. Brian J. Bergman & Jeffery S. McMullen, 2022. "Helping Entrepreneurs Help Themselves: A Review and Relational Research Agenda on Entrepreneurial Support Organizations," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 46(3), pages 688-728, May.
    14. Christopher S. Hayter & Andrew J. Nelson & Stephanie Zayed & Alan C. O’Connor, 2018. "Conceptualizing academic entrepreneurship ecosystems: a review, analysis and extension of the literature," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 43(4), pages 1039-1082, August.
    15. Francesc Xavier Grau, 2016. "A short communication on glocal universities," International Journal of Knowledge-Based Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(1), pages 63-74.
    16. Ratinho, Tiago & Amezcua, Alejandro & Honig, Benson & Zeng, Zhaocheng, 2020. "Supporting entrepreneurs: A systematic review of literature and an agenda for research," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    17. Mirko Guaralda & Greg Hearn & Marcus Foth & Tan Yigitcanlar & Severine Mayere & Lisa Law, 2020. "Towards Australian Regional Turnaround: Insights into Sustainably Accommodating Post-Pandemic Urban Growth in Regional Towns and Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-13, December.
    18. Good, Matthew & Knockaert, Mirjam & Soppe, Birthe & Wright, Mike, 2019. "The technology transfer ecosystem in academia. An organizational design perspective," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 82, pages 35-50.
    19. Tan Yigitcanlar & Jamile Sabatini-Marques & Cibele Lorenzi & Nathalia Bernardinetti & Tatiana Schreiner & Ana Fachinelli & Tatiana Wittmann, 2018. "Towards Smart Florianópolis: What Does It Take to Transform a Tourist Island into an Innovation Capital?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-32, November.
    20. Isabel Diez-Vial & Angeles Montoro-Sanchez, 2017. "Research evolution in science parks and incubators: foundations and new trends," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 110(3), pages 1243-1272, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:99:y:2020:i:c:s0264837720309078. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.