IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v95y2020ics0264837719319192.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How can contemporary innovation districts be classified? A systematic review of the literature

Author

Listed:
  • Yigitcanlar, Tan
  • Adu-McVie, Rosemary
  • Erol, Isil

Abstract

Innovation is a key driver of economic growth and competitiveness, and innovation clusters house much of the innovation generating high-tech and creative industries. These clusters, as a land use type, evolved overtime in terms of their functions, features, and spatial characteristics. This has led to their reconceptualization from a ‘science and technology park’ model to a ‘innovation district’ model. The key functional and spatial characteristics of innovation districts vary due to the local contextual factors. This makes the determination of the generic typologies of innovation districts challenging, and hence an understudied area of research. This paper aims to expand our understanding on the classification of innovation districts based on their key characteristics. The methodological approach of the study employs a systematic review of the literature on innovation districts, and places global case studies under the microscope. The results point to a holistic approach for the classification of innovation districts through three key factors—(a) Function; (b) Feature, and; (c) Space-use—and their 28 indicators. Each of these factors along with the broader ‘context’, as the fourth one, forms a cornerstone of a conceptual typology framework. The study findings consolidate our understanding on innovation districts, and informs policymaking mechanisms on their planning and development.

Suggested Citation

  • Yigitcanlar, Tan & Adu-McVie, Rosemary & Erol, Isil, 2020. "How can contemporary innovation districts be classified? A systematic review of the literature," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:95:y:2020:i:c:s0264837719319192
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104595
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837719319192
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104595?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maryann Feldman & Ted D. Zoller, 2012. "Dealmakers in Place: Social Capital Connections in Regional Entrepreneurial Economies," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(1), pages 23-37, June.
    2. Kelsi G. Hobbs & Albert N. Link & John T. Scott, 2017. "Science and technology parks: an annotated and analytical literature review," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 42(4), pages 957-976, August.
    3. Smoliński, Adam & Pichlak, Magdalena, 2009. "Innovation in Polish industry: The cluster concept applied to clean coal technologies in Silesia," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 356-364.
    4. Niusha Esmaeilpoorarabi & Tan Yigitcanlar & Mirko Guaralda, 2016. "Place quality and urban competitiveness symbiosis? A position paper," International Journal of Knowledge-Based Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(1), pages 4-21.
    5. Esmaeilpoorarabi, Niusha & Yigitcanlar, Tan & Guaralda, Mirko & Kamruzzaman, Md., 2018. "Evaluating place quality in innovation districts: A Delphic hierarchy process approach," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 471-486.
    6. Esmaeilpoorarabi, Niusha & Yigitcanlar, Tan & Guaralda, Mirko & Kamruzzaman, Md., 2018. "Does place quality matter for innovation districts? Determining the essential place characteristics from Brisbane’s knowledge precincts," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 734-747.
    7. Arnault Morisson & Carmelina Bevilacqua, 2019. "Balancing gentrification in the knowledge economy: the case of Chattanooga’s innovation district," Urban Research & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(4), pages 472-492, October.
    8. Amin, Ash & Roberts, Joanne, 2008. "Knowing in action: Beyond communities of practice," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 353-369, March.
    9. Bjørn Asheim & Lars Coenen & Jan Vang, 2007. "Face-to-Face, Buzz, and Knowledge Bases: Sociospatial Implications for Learning, Innovation, and Innovation Policy," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 25(5), pages 655-670, October.
    10. JinHyo Joseph Yun & Xiaofei Zhao & Tan Yigitcanlar & DooSeok Lee & HeungJu Ahn, 2018. "Architectural Design and Open Innovation Symbiosis: Insights from Research Campuses, Manufacturing Systems, and Innovation Districts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-23, November.
    11. Sandro Montresor & Giuseppe Vittucci Marzetti, 2008. "Innovation Clusters in Technological Systems: A Network Analysis of 15 OECD Countries for the Mid-1990s," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(3), pages 321-346.
    12. Catalin Boja, 2011. "Clusters Models, Factors and Characteristics," International Journal of Economic Practices and Theories, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 1(1), pages 34-43, July.
    13. Maryann Feldman, 2014. "The character of innovative places: entrepreneurial strategy, economic development, and prosperity," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 43(1), pages 9-20, June.
    14. Andrew L. Jones, 2017. "Regenerating Urban Waterfronts—Creating Better Futures—From Commercial and Leisure Market Places to Cultural Quarters and Innovation Districts," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(3), pages 333-344, May.
    15. Scott Hawken & Jung Hoon Han, 2017. "Innovation districts and urban heterogeneity: 3D mapping of industry mix in downtown Sydney," Journal of Urban Design, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(5), pages 568-590, September.
    16. Rafael Boix & Vittorio Galletto, 2009. "Innovation and Industrial Districts: A First Approach to the Measurement and Determinants of the I-District Effect," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(9), pages 1117-1133.
    17. Ignasi Capdevila, 2015. "Co-Working Spaces And The Localised Dynamics Of Innovation In Barcelona," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 19(03), pages 1-28.
    18. Esmaeilpoorarabi, Niusha & Yigitcanlar, Tan & Kamruzzaman, Md. & Guaralda, Mirko, 2020. "Conceptual frameworks of innovation district place quality: An opinion paper," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    19. Altenburg, Tilman & Meyer-Stamer, JORG, 1999. "How to Promote Clusters: Policy Experiences from Latin America," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 27(9), pages 1693-1713, September.
    20. Surabhi Pancholi & Tan Yigitcanlar & Mirko Guaralda, 2015. "Place making facilitators of knowledge and innovation spaces: insights from European best practices," International Journal of Knowledge-Based Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 6(3), pages 215-240.
    21. Daniel Gabaldón-Estevan & Josep-Antoni Ybarra, 2017. "Innovative culture in district innovation systems of European ceramics SMEs," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(11), pages 2021-2036, November.
    22. Pancholi, Surabhi & Yigitcanlar, Tan & Guaralda, Mirko, 2019. "Place making for innovation and knowledge-intensive activities: The Australian experience," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 616-625.
    23. Willem van Winden & Luis Carvalho, 2016. "Urbanize or Perish? Assessing the Urbanization of Knowledge Locations in Europe," Journal of Urban Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(1), pages 53-70, January.
    24. Ann Markusen, 1996. "Sticky Places in Slippery Space: A Typology of Industrial Districts," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 72(3), pages 293-313, July.
    25. Paul Benneworth & Tiago Ratinho, 2014. "Reframing the Role of Knowledge Parks and Science Cities in Knowledge-Based Urban Development," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 32(5), pages 784-808, October.
    26. Tan Yigitcanlar & Mirko Guaralda & Manuela Taboada & Surabhi Pancholi, 2016. "Place Making for Knowledge Generation and Innovation: Planning and Branding Brisbane's Knowledge Community Precincts," Journal of Urban Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(1), pages 115-146, January.
    27. Olivier Crevoisier, 2014. "Beyond Territorial Innovation Models: The Pertinence of the Territorial Approach," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(3), pages 551-561, March.
    28. Yigitcanlar, Tan & Sabatini-Marques, Jamile & da-Costa, Eduardo Moreira & Kamruzzaman, Md & Ioppolo, Giuseppe, 2019. "Stimulating technological innovation through incentives: Perceptions of Australian and Brazilian firms," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 403-412.
    29. Surabhi Pancholi & Tan Yigitcanlar & Mirko Guaralda, 2018. "Attributes of successful place-making in knowledge and innovation spaces: evidence from Brisbane’s Diamantina knowledge precinct," Journal of Urban Design, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(5), pages 693-711, September.
    30. James Simmie, 2005. "Critical surveys edited by Stephen Roper innovation and space: A critical review of the literature," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(6), pages 789-804.
    31. Leslie Bank & Francis Sibanda, 2018. "Universities as city-builders: The city-campus development opportunity in East London–Buffalo City, South Africa," Development Southern Africa, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(5), pages 701-715, September.
    32. Tan Yigitcanlar & Jamile Sabatini-Marques & Cibele Lorenzi & Nathalia Bernardinetti & Tatiana Schreiner & Ana Fachinelli & Tatiana Wittmann, 2018. "Towards Smart Florianópolis: What Does It Take to Transform a Tourist Island into an Innovation Capital?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-32, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yue Wu & Yue Yang & Weishun Xu & Qiuxiao Chen, 2020. "The Influence of Innovation Resources in Higher Education Institutions on the Development of Sci-Tech Parks’ Enterprises in the Urban Innovative Districts at the Stage of Urbanization Transformation," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-36, October.
    2. Jiwu Wang & Chengyu Tong & Xuewei Hu, 2021. "Policy Zoning Method for Innovation Districts to Sustainably Develop the Knowledge-Economy: A Case Study in Hangzhou, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-19, March.
    3. Pancholi, Surabhi & Yigitcanlar, Tan & Guaralda, Mirko & Mayere, Severine & Caldwell, Glenda Amayo & Medland, Richard, 2020. "University and innovation district symbiosis in the context of placemaking: Insights from Australian cities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    4. Adu-McVie, Rosemary & Yigitcanlar, Tan & Erol, Isil & Xia, Bo, 2021. "Classifying innovation districts: Delphi validation of a multidimensional framework," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    5. Mirko Guaralda & Greg Hearn & Marcus Foth & Tan Yigitcanlar & Severine Mayere & Lisa Law, 2020. "Towards Australian Regional Turnaround: Insights into Sustainably Accommodating Post-Pandemic Urban Growth in Regional Towns and Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-13, December.
    6. Yin, Qiqi & Sui, Xueyan & Ye, Bei & Zhou, Yujie & Li, Chengqiang & Zou, Mengmeng & Zhou, Shenglu, 2022. "What role does land consolidation play in the multi-dimensional rural revitalization in China? A research synthesis," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Adu-McVie, Rosemary & Yigitcanlar, Tan & Erol, Isil & Xia, Bo, 2021. "Classifying innovation districts: Delphi validation of a multidimensional framework," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    2. Jiwu Wang & Chengyu Tong & Xuewei Hu, 2021. "Policy Zoning Method for Innovation Districts to Sustainably Develop the Knowledge-Economy: A Case Study in Hangzhou, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-19, March.
    3. Pancholi, Surabhi & Yigitcanlar, Tan & Guaralda, Mirko & Mayere, Severine & Caldwell, Glenda Amayo & Medland, Richard, 2020. "University and innovation district symbiosis in the context of placemaking: Insights from Australian cities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    4. JinHyo Joseph Yun & Xiaofei Zhao & Tan Yigitcanlar & DooSeok Lee & HeungJu Ahn, 2018. "Architectural Design and Open Innovation Symbiosis: Insights from Research Campuses, Manufacturing Systems, and Innovation Districts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-23, November.
    5. Mengi, Onur & Bilandzic, Ana & Foth, Marcus & Guaralda, Mirko, 2020. "Mapping Brisbane’s Casual Creative Corridor: Land use and policy implications of a new genre in urban creative ecosystems," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    6. Yue Wu & Yue Yang & Weishun Xu & Qiuxiao Chen, 2020. "The Influence of Innovation Resources in Higher Education Institutions on the Development of Sci-Tech Parks’ Enterprises in the Urban Innovative Districts at the Stage of Urbanization Transformation," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-36, October.
    7. Youwei Tan & Qinglan Qian & Xiaolan Chen, 2023. "Empirical Evaluation of the Impact of Informal Communication Space Quality on Innovation in Innovation Districts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-16, March.
    8. Kangmin Wu & Yang Wang & Yuyao Ye & Hongou Zhang & Guangqing Huang, 2019. "Relationship Between the Built Environment and the Location Choice of High-Tech Firms: Evidence from the Pearl River Delta," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-21, July.
    9. Laura Lecluyse & Mirjam Knockaert & André Spithoven, 2019. "The contribution of science parks: a literature review and future research agenda," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 44(2), pages 559-595, April.
    10. F.C. Stam & Ben Spigel, 2016. "Entrepreneurial Ecosystems," Working Papers 16-13, Utrecht School of Economics.
    11. Ross Brown & Colin Mason, 2017. "Looking inside the spiky bits: a critical review and conceptualisation of entrepreneurial ecosystems," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 49(1), pages 11-30, June.
    12. Esmaeilpoorarabi, Niusha & Yigitcanlar, Tan & Guaralda, Mirko & Kamruzzaman, Md., 2018. "Does place quality matter for innovation districts? Determining the essential place characteristics from Brisbane’s knowledge precincts," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 734-747.
    13. Alessandra Colombelli & Emilio Paolucci & Elisa Ughetto, 2019. "Hierarchical and relational governance and the life cycle of entrepreneurial ecosystems," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 52(2), pages 505-521, February.
    14. Ana Cristina Fachinelli & Tan Yigitcanlar & Jamile Sabatini-Marques & Tatiana Tucunduva Philippi Cortese & Debora Sotto & Bianca Libardi, 2023. "Urban Smartness and City Performance: Identifying Brazilian Smart Cities through a Novel Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-24, June.
    15. Haifeng Qian, 2018. "Knowledge-Based Regional Economic Development: A Synthetic Review of Knowledge Spillovers, Entrepreneurship, and Entrepreneurial Ecosystems," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 32(2), pages 163-176, May.
    16. Ben Spigel, 2017. "The Relational Organization of Entrepreneurial Ecosystems," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 41(1), pages 49-72, January.
    17. Tan Yigitcanlar & Jamile Sabatini-Marques & Cibele Lorenzi & Nathalia Bernardinetti & Tatiana Schreiner & Ana Fachinelli & Tatiana Wittmann, 2018. "Towards Smart Florianópolis: What Does It Take to Transform a Tourist Island into an Innovation Capital?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-32, November.
    18. Esmaeilpoorarabi, Niusha & Yigitcanlar, Tan & Guaralda, Mirko & Kamruzzaman, Md., 2018. "Evaluating place quality in innovation districts: A Delphic hierarchy process approach," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 471-486.
    19. Tan Yigitcanlar & Ingi Runar Edvardsson & Hjalti Johannesson & Md Kamruzzaman & Giuseppe Ioppolo & Surabhi Pancholi, 2017. "Knowledge-based development dynamics in less favoured regions: insights from Australian and Icelandic university towns," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(12), pages 2272-2292, December.
    20. Paul Benneworth & Tiago Ratinho, 2014. "Reframing the Role of Knowledge Parks and Science Cities in Knowledge-Based Urban Development," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 32(5), pages 784-808, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:95:y:2020:i:c:s0264837719319192. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.