IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v122y2022ics0264837722004215.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The complexity of property rights embedded in the rural-to-urban resettlement of China: A case of Hangzhou

Author

Listed:
  • Yang, Chen
  • Qian, Zhu

Abstract

China’s dual land ownership structure creates distinctive land markets in rural and urban areas, and the issue of ambiguous property rights systems is theoretically regarded as a rural issue. In recent years, rural-to-urban resettlement has become a potent tool of the government in promoting urbanization and addressing the ambiguity issue. Yet, resettlement projects may deviate from the presupposed ideal path of achieving equitable property rights through property rights rearrangements. This research aims to unpack the complexity of property rights embedded in rural-to-urban resettlement based on the empirical case of Hangzhou. Based on documentary analysis, field observation, in-depth interviews, and questionnaire surveys, this research argues that the ambiguity issue cannot be fully addressed through rural-to-urban transition, and the concomitant complexity issue is inevitable in urban areas without targeted policy remedies. The findings identify some main obstacles to the ideal transition of property rights systems. First, the resettled villagers are excluded from market participation by inadequate compensation through planning mechanisms. Second, resettlement communities suffer from the remaining rurality that challenges the enforcement of formal institutions and the governance of communal resources in the urban system. Third, the collective-retained land is an innovative but compromised institution devised by the local government to achieve a fair property rights rearrangement through resettlement, but its effectiveness is weakened by the politics at the village level. These findings have important policy implications for achieving equitable property rights in the context of China’s heightened attention to sustainable urban-rural development.

Suggested Citation

  • Yang, Chen & Qian, Zhu, 2022. "The complexity of property rights embedded in the rural-to-urban resettlement of China: A case of Hangzhou," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:122:y:2022:i:c:s0264837722004215
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106394
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837722004215
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106394?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter J. Boettke & Christopher J. Coyne & Peter T. Leeson, 2015. "Institutional stickiness and the New Development Economics," Chapters, in: Laura E. Grube & Virgil Henry Storr (ed.), Culture and Economic Action, chapter 6, pages 123-146, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    2. Fulong Wu & John Logan, 2016. "Do rural migrants ‘float’ in urban China? Neighbouring and neighbourhood sentiment in Beijing," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(14), pages 2973-2990, November.
    3. William A. Fischel, 1978. "A Property Rights Approach to Municipal Zoning," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 54(1), pages 64-81.
    4. Kong, Xuesong & Liu, Yaolin & Jiang, Ping & Tian, Yasi & Zou, Yafeng, 2018. "A novel framework for rural homestead land transfer under collective ownership in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 138-146.
    5. R. H. Coase, 2013. "The Problem of Social Cost," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 56(4), pages 837-877.
    6. Demsetz, Harold, 2002. "Toward a Theory of Property Rights II: The Competition between Private and Collective Ownership," The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 31(2), pages 653-672, June.
    7. Cai, Meina & Murtazashvili, Ilia & Murtazashvili, Jennifer, 2020. "The politics of land property rights," Journal of Institutional Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 16(2), pages 151-167, April.
    8. Zhu Qian, 2015. "From the First Five-Year Plan to the Cultural Revolution: the pre-reform urban transformation of Hangzhou, China," Planning Perspectives, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(4), pages 571-595, October.
    9. Steven Lawry & Cyrus Samii & Ruth Hall & Aaron Leopold & Donna Hornby & Farai Mtero, 2017. "The impact of land property rights interventions on investment and agricultural productivity in developing countries: a systematic review," Journal of Development Effectiveness, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(1), pages 61-81, January.
    10. He, Shenjing & Wang, Dong & Webster, Chris & Chau, Kwong Wing, 2019. "Property rights with price tags? Pricing uncertainties in the production, transaction and consumption of China’s small property right housing," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 424-433.
    11. Deininger, Klaus & Jin, Songqing, 2009. "Securing property rights in transition: Lessons from implementation of China's rural land contracting law," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 70(1-2), pages 22-38, May.
    12. Qian, Zhu & Xue, Jianhong, 2017. "Small town urbanization in Western China: Villager resettlement and integration in Xi’an," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 152-159.
    13. Feng Deng, 2020. "Informality, informal institutions, and uneven land reform in China," Post-Communist Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(4), pages 495-510, May.
    14. Hong, Zhaohui & Sun, Yi, 2020. "Power, capital, and the poverty of farmers’ land rights in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    15. Webster, Chris & Wu, Fulong & Zhang, Fangzhu & Sarkar, Chinmoy, 2016. "Informality, property rights, and poverty in China’s “favelas”," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 461-476.
    16. Wang, Rongyu & Tan, Rong, 2020. "Efficiency and distribution of rural construction land marketization in contemporary China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    17. Xie, Yong, 2019. "Land expropriation, shock to employment, and employment differentiation: Findings from land-lost farmers in Nanjing, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    18. Harold Demsetz, 1974. "Toward a Theory of Property Rights," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Chennat Gopalakrishnan (ed.), Classic Papers in Natural Resource Economics, chapter 8, pages 163-177, Palgrave Macmillan.
    19. Yuk‐Shing Cheng & Kim‐Sau Chung, 2018. "Designing Property Rights over Land in Rural China," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 128(615), pages 2676-2710, November.
    20. Qiu, Tongwei & Zhang, Danru & Choy, S.T. Boris & Luo, Biliang, 2021. "The interaction between informal and formal institutions: A case study of private land property rights in rural China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 578-591.
    21. Chen, Kunqiu & Long, Hualou & Liao, Liuwen & Tu, Shuangshuang & Li, Tingting, 2020. "Land use transitions and urban-rural integrated development: Theoretical framework and China’s evidence," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    22. Lai, Yani & Wang, Jiayuan & Lok, Waiming, 2017. "Redefining property rights over collective land in the urban redevelopment of Shenzhen, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 485-493.
    23. Yanlong Zhang, 2021. "The Demsetz’s Evolutionary Theory of Property Rights as Applied to Rural Land of China: A Supplement," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-15, August.
    24. Min Zhang & Weiping Wu & Weijing Zhong, 2018. "Agency and social construction of space under top-down planning: Resettled rural residents in China," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(7), pages 1541-1560, May.
    25. Song, Mingjie & Wu, Yuling & Chen, Lu, 2020. "Does the land titling program promote rural housing land transfer in China? Evidence from household surveys in Hubei Province," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    26. Wang, Rongyu & Tan, Rong, 2020. "Patterns of revenue distribution in rural residential land consolidation in contemporary China: The perspective of property rights delineation," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    27. Jieming Zhu, 2002. "Urban Development under Ambiguous Property Rights: A Case of China’s Transition Economy," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(1), pages 41-57, March.
    28. Mengzhu Zhang & Shenjing He, 2020. "Informal Property Rights as Relational and Functional: Unravelling the Relational Contract in China's Informal Housing Market," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(6), pages 967-988, November.
    29. Alchian, Armen A. & Demsetz, Harold, 1973. "The Property Right Paradigm," The Journal of Economic History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 33(1), pages 16-27, March.
    30. Kathryn Gomersall, 2021. "Governance of resettlement compensation and the cultural fix in rural China," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(1), pages 150-167, February.
    31. Lai, Yani & Zheng, Xian & Choy, Lennon H.T. & Wang, Jiayuan, 2017. "Property rights and housing prices: An empirical study of small property rights housing in Shenzhen, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 429-437.
    32. Sa, Haoxuan, 2020. "Do ambiguous property rights matter? Collective value logic in Lin Village," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    33. You, Heyuan & Zhang, Jinrong & Song, Yan, 2022. "Assessing conflict of farmland institutions using credibility theory: Implications for socially acceptable land use," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    34. Huimin Du & Jing Song & Si-ming Li, 2021. "‘Peasants are peasants’: Prejudice against displaced villagers in newly-built urban neighbourhoods in China," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(8), pages 1598-1614, June.
    35. Zhou, Yang & Li, Xunhuan & Liu, Yansui, 2020. "Rural land system reforms in China: History, issues, measures and prospects," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    36. Agboola, Alirat Olayinka & Scofield, David & Amidu, Abdul-Rasheed, 2017. "Understanding property market operations from a dual institutional perspective: The case of Lagos, Nigeria," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 89-96.
    37. Lu, Xiao & Peng, Wenlong & Huang, Xianjin & Fu, Qianqian & Zhang, Quanjing, 2020. "Homestead management in China from the “separation of two rights” to the “separation of three rights”: Visualization and analysis of hot topics and trends by mapping knowledge domains of academic pape," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    38. Cai, Yongyang & Selod, Harris & Steinbuks, Jevgenijs, 2018. "Urbanization and land property rights," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 246-257.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yingying Li, 2022. "The Dilemma and Countermeasures of Public Interest Litigation of Marine Environmental Pollution in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-24, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yixiang Chen & Xiangmu Jin, 2023. "How Do Farmers Realize Their Rights on the Collective Land in Rural China? An Explanatory Framework for Deconstructing the Subject of Collective Land Ownership," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-17, September.
    2. Lin, Wanlin & Lin, George C.S., 2023. "Strategizing actors and agents in the functioning of informal property Rights: The tragicomedy of the extralegal housing market in China," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    3. Hongbin Liu & Yuepeng Zhou, 2020. "The Marketization of Rural Collective Construction Land in Northeastern China: The Mechanism Exploration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-17, December.
    4. Yan, Jinming & Yang, Yumeng & Xia, Fangzhou, 2021. "Subjective land ownership and the endowment effect in land markets: A case study of the farmland “three rights separation” reform in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    5. Munshifwa, Ephraim Kabunda, 2023. "Institutional analysis and informal urban settlements: A proposition for a new institutionalist grounded property rights perspective," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    6. Li Huang & Minjie Zheng & Rongyu Wang, 2022. "Rural Housing Rental Rates in China: Regional Differences, Influencing Factors, and Policy Implications," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-20, July.
    7. He, Shenjing & Wang, Dong & Webster, Chris & Chau, Kwong Wing, 2019. "Property rights with price tags? Pricing uncertainties in the production, transaction and consumption of China’s small property right housing," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 424-433.
    8. Xianjun Wang & Junfang Kang, 2023. "Decision Making and Influencing Factors in Withdrawal of Rural Residential Land-Use Rights in Suzhou, Anhui Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-20, February.
    9. Dongshui Xie & Caiquan Bai & Huimin Wang & Qihang Xue, 2022. "The Land System and the Rise and Fall of China’s Rural Industrialization: Based on the Perspective of Institutional Change of Rural Collective Construction Land," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-22, June.
    10. Zehua Wang & Fachao Liang & Sheng-Hau Lin, 2023. "Can socially sustainable development be achieved through homestead withdrawal? A hybrid multiple-attributes decision analysis," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-18, December.
    11. Jason Coupet & Abagail McWilliams, 2017. "Integrating Organizational Economics and Resource Dependence Theory to Explain the Persistence of Quasi Markets," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-13, August.
    12. Yichi Zhang & Kai Xue & Huimin Cao & Yingen Hu, 2023. "The Non-Linear Relationship between the Number of Permanent Residents and the Willingness of Rural Residential Land Transfer: The Threshold Effect of per Capita Net Income," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-23, August.
    13. Cheung, K.S. & Wong, S.K. & Wu, H. & Yiu, C.Y., 2021. "The land governance cost on co-ownership: A study of the cross-lease in New Zealand," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    14. Li, Jing & Lo, Kevin & Zhang, Pingyu & Guo, Meng, 2021. "Reclaiming small to fill large: A novel approach to rural residential land consolidation in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    15. Li, Ling & Xia, Fangzhou, 2022. "Wandering in the gray: The pricing of housing restricted by land use regulation in Beijing, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    16. Haoxuan Sa, 2021. "Urban Village Shareholding: Cooperative Economic Organization in Northeast China," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 80(2), pages 665-697, March.
    17. Burns, Anthony Francis & Rajabifard, Abbas & Shojaei, Davood, 2023. "Undertaking land administration reform: Is there a better way?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    18. Jing Wang & Kai Zhao & Yue Cui & Hui Cao, 2022. "Formal and Informal Institutions in Farmers’ Withdrawal from Rural Homesteads in China: Heterogeneity Analysis Based on the Village Location," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-19, October.
    19. Mengzhu Zhang & Shenjing He, 2020. "Informal Property Rights as Relational and Functional: Unravelling the Relational Contract in China's Informal Housing Market," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(6), pages 967-988, November.
    20. Jiao, Man & Xu, Hengzhou, 2022. "How do Collective Operating Construction Land (COCL) Transactions affect rural residents’ property income? Evidence from rural Deqing County, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:122:y:2022:i:c:s0264837722004215. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.