IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v114y2022ics0264837721006530.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Scaling up UAVs for land administration: Towards the plateau of productivity

Author

Listed:
  • Stöcker, Claudia
  • Bennett, Rohan
  • Koeva, Mila
  • Nex, Francesco
  • Zevenbergen, Jaap

Abstract

Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) are considered an innovative tool for land administration. However, despite the prospects and market opportunities in the domain, there is a gap between experimentation and widespread technology diffusion. In this work, the Framework for Effective Land Administration (FELA) and the Hype Cycle concept are integrated to understand the dynamics of the innovation process of UAVs for the land administration sector. Empirical data stems from literature and interviews of UAV and land administration experts worldwide. The majority of experts estimate UAV technology to be in a phase in which the innovation needs to overcome initial unmet expectations to foster market development and increased adoption. The assessment indicates the changing importance of different FELA pathways during this process. Enabling laws and policies and supporting governance, accountability and institutions are crucial to create such a UAV-friendly national ecosystem early on and allay exaggerated expectations. Once this ecosystem has been made, market demand is expected to surge driven by partnerships, adapted standards, tech advocacy and awareness-raising campaigns, highlighting the superiority of high-resolution data amongst other benefits of UAV technology. These insights can be used as a baseline to direct national strategic decisions towards the increased adoption of UAVs in land administration.

Suggested Citation

  • Stöcker, Claudia & Bennett, Rohan & Koeva, Mila & Nex, Francesco & Zevenbergen, Jaap, 2022. "Scaling up UAVs for land administration: Towards the plateau of productivity," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:114:y:2022:i:c:s0264837721006530
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105930
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837721006530
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105930?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nir Kshetri, 2017. "Will blockchain emerge as a tool to break the poverty chain in the Global South?," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(8), pages 1710-1732, August.
    2. Bennett, Rohan Mark & Pickering, M. & Sargent, J., 2019. "Transformations, transitions, or tall tales? A global review of the uptake and impact of NoSQL, blockchain, and big data analytics on the land administration sector," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 435-448.
    3. Dario Floreano & Robert J. Wood, 2015. "Science, technology and the future of small autonomous drones," Nature, Nature, vol. 521(7553), pages 460-466, May.
    4. Zeng, Zhongping & Cleon, Christian Bobby, 2018. "Factors affecting the adoption of a land information system: An empirical analysis in Liberia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 353-362.
    5. Giones, Ferran & Brem, Alexander, 2017. "From toys to tools: The co-evolution of technological and entrepreneurial developments in the drone industry," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 60(6), pages 875-884.
    6. Casiano Flores, Cesar & Tan, Evrim & Buntinx, Ine & Crompvoets, Joep & Stöcker, Claudia & Zevenbergen, Jaap, 2020. "Governance assessment of the UAVs implementation in Rwanda under the fit-for-purpose land administration approach," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    7. Haula, Kitonsa & Agbozo, Ebenezer, 2020. "A systematic review on unmanned aerial vehicles in Sub-Saharan Africa: A socio-technical perspective," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    8. Dedehayir, Ozgur & Steinert, Martin, 2016. "The hype cycle model: A review and future directions," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 28-41.
    9. Hendriks, Bob & Zevenbergen, Jaap & Bennett, Rohan & Antonio, Danilo, 2019. "Pro-poor land administration: Towards practical, coordinated, and scalable recording systems for all," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 21-38.
    10. Trias Aditya & Eva Maria-Unger & Christelle vd Berg & Rohan Bennett & Paul Saers & Han Lukman Syahid & Doni Erwan & Tjeerd Wits & Nurrohmat Widjajanti & Purnama Budi Santosa & Dedi Atunggal & Imam Han, 2020. "Participatory Land Administration in Indonesia: Quality and Usability Assessment," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-27, March.
    11. Santos, Florence & Fletschner, Diana & Daconto, Giuseppe, 2014. "Enhancing Inclusiveness of Rwanda’s Land Tenure Regularization Program: Insights from Early Stages of its Implementation," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 30-41.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ansah, Barikisa Owusu & Voss, Winrich & Asiama, Kwabena Obeng & Wuni, Ibrahim Yahaya, 2023. "A systematic review of the institutional success factors for blockchain-based land administration," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    2. Muhammad Sheraz Ahsan & Ejaz Hussain & Zahir Ali & Jaap Zevenbergen & Salman Atif & Mila Koeva & Abdul Waheed, 2023. "Assessing the Status and Challenges of Urban Land Administration Systems Using Framework for Effective Land Administration (FELA): A Case Study in Pakistan," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-27, August.
    3. Bujar Fetai & Jernej Tekavec & Mojca Kosmatin Fras & Anka Lisec, 2022. "Inconsistencies in Cadastral Boundary Data—Digitisation and Maintenance," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-19, December.
    4. Rohan Mark Bennett & Jerome Donovan & Eryadi Masli & Kirsikka Riekkinen, 2023. "Land Administration As-A-Service: Relevance, Applications, and Models," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, January.
    5. Simon Hull & Harold Liversage & Maria Paola Rizzo & Vladimir Evtimov, 2022. "An Overview of Frontier Technologies for Land Tenure: How to Avoid the Hype and Focus on What Matters," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-15, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Casiano Flores, Cesar & Tan, Evrim & Crompvoets, Joep, 2021. "Governance assessment of UAV implementation in Kenyan land administration system," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    2. Noor Islam Jasim & Hairoladenan Kasim & Moamin A. Mahmoud, 2022. "Towards the Development of Smart and Sustainable Transportation System for Foodservice Industry: Modelling Factors Influencing Customer’s Intention to Adopt Drone Food Delivery (DFD) Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-21, March.
    3. Rohan Mark Bennett & Eva-Maria Unger & Christiaan Lemmen & Paula Dijkstra, 2021. "Land Administration Maintenance: A Review of the Persistent Problem and Emerging Fit-for-Purpose Solutions," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-18, May.
    4. Mahsa Mesgar & Diego Ramirez-Lovering, 2021. "Informal Land Rights and Infrastructure Retrofit: A Typology of Land Rights in Informal Settlements," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-17, March.
    5. Dwi Budi Martono & Trias Aditya & Subaryono Subaryono & Prijono Nugroho, 2021. "The Legal Element of Fixing the Boundary for Indonesian Complete Cadastre," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-24, January.
    6. Gholipour, Hassan F. & Arjomandi, Amir & Andargoli, Amirhossein Eslami & Bennett, Rohan, 2023. "On real estate market transparency: The relationship with ICT trade and investment," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    7. White, Gareth R.T. & Samuel, Anthony, 2019. "Programmatic Advertising: Forewarning and avoiding hype-cycle failure," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 157-168.
    8. Giones, Ferran & Brem, Alexander, 2017. "From toys to tools: The co-evolution of technological and entrepreneurial developments in the drone industry," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 60(6), pages 875-884.
    9. Abdul-Manan, Amir F.N., 2017. "Lifecycle GHG emissions of palm biodiesel: Unintended market effects negate direct benefits of the Malaysian Economic Transformation Plan (ETP)," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 56-65.
    10. Kriechbaum, Michael & Posch, Alfred & Hauswiesner, Angelika, 2021. "Hype cycles during socio-technical transitions: The dynamics of collective expectations about renewable energy in Germany," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(9).
    11. Kloster, Konstantin & Moeini, Mahdi & Vigo, Daniele & Wendt, Oliver, 2023. "The multiple traveling salesman problem in presence of drone- and robot-supported packet stations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 305(2), pages 630-643.
    12. Kalghatgi, Gautam, 2018. "Is it really the end of internal combustion engines and petroleum in transport?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C), pages 965-974.
    13. Aditya, Trias & Santosa, Purnama Budi & Yulaikhah, Yulaikhah & Widjajanti, Nurrohmat & Atunggal, Dedi & Sulistyawati, Miranty, 2021. "Title Validation and collaborative mapping to accelerate quality assurance of land registration," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    14. David Mark Dror & Martin Eling, 2021. "Innovations in microinsurance research," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 46(3), pages 325-330, July.
    15. Bennett, Rohan Mark & Pickering, M. & Sargent, J., 2019. "Transformations, transitions, or tall tales? A global review of the uptake and impact of NoSQL, blockchain, and big data analytics on the land administration sector," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 435-448.
    16. Daxini, Amar & O’Donoghue, Cathal & Ryan, Mary & Buckley, Cathal & Barnes, Andrew P., 2018. "Factors influencing farmers' intentions to adopt nutrient management planning: accounting for heterogeneity," 166th Seminar, August 30-31, 2018, Galway, West of Ireland 276183, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    17. Nyaaba, Albert Apotele & Ayamga, Matthew, 2021. "Intricacies of medical drones in healthcare delivery: Implications for Africa," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    18. Simon Hull & Jennifer Whittal, 2021. "Do Design Science Research and Design Thinking Processes Improve the ‘Fit’ of the Fit-For-Purpose Approach to Securing Land Tenure for All in South Africa?," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-26, May.
    19. Uma Shankar Panday & Raja Ram Chhatkuli & Janak Raj Joshi & Jagat Deuja & Danilo Antonio & Stig Enemark, 2021. "Securing Land Rights for All through Fit-for-Purpose Land Administration Approach: The Case of Nepal," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-24, July.
    20. Ozili, Peterson K, 2020. "Contesting digital finance for the poor," MPRA Paper 101812, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:114:y:2022:i:c:s0264837721006530. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.