IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v12y2023i8p1560-d1211665.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the Status and Challenges of Urban Land Administration Systems Using Framework for Effective Land Administration (FELA): A Case Study in Pakistan

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad Sheraz Ahsan

    (Institute of Geographical Information Systems, National University of Sciences and Technology (NUST), Islamabad 44000, Pakistan
    Faculty of Geoinformation and Earth Observation (ITC), University of Twente, 7522 NH Enschede, The Netherlands)

  • Ejaz Hussain

    (Institute of Geographical Information Systems, National University of Sciences and Technology (NUST), Islamabad 44000, Pakistan)

  • Zahir Ali

    (National Centre for Remote Sensing and GIS, Institute of Space Technology, Karachi 75270, Pakistan)

  • Jaap Zevenbergen

    (Faculty of Geoinformation and Earth Observation (ITC), University of Twente, 7522 NH Enschede, The Netherlands)

  • Salman Atif

    (Institute of Geographical Information Systems, National University of Sciences and Technology (NUST), Islamabad 44000, Pakistan)

  • Mila Koeva

    (Faculty of Geoinformation and Earth Observation (ITC), University of Twente, 7522 NH Enschede, The Netherlands)

  • Abdul Waheed

    (Institute of Geographical Information Systems, National University of Sciences and Technology (NUST), Islamabad 44000, Pakistan)

Abstract

The urban land administration system (LAS) of any country serves as a key pillar for good governance, resource planning, service delivery, infrastructure development, and revenue collection. To reform their LASs, countries need a thorough understanding of their existing context and global relevance. The goal of this paper is to examine the status and challenges of urban LASs in Pakistan using the United Nations Framework for Effective Land Administration (FELA). The exploratory case study method used in the paper employs a mixed approach, which includes FELA-based questionnaire surveys, group discussions, and desk reviews. A total of 525 urban LAS stakeholders, including owner-buyers, real estate agents, bankers, lawyers, and LAS organizations, participated in the activity. The results show that more than half of the stakeholders are not satisfied with existing urban LASs, their governance and accountability, laws, and policies. Corruption is prevalent mostly in government organizations. Fraud and joint ownership are the most common sources of dispute, with 67 percent of the respondents stating that the cases take more than two years to resolve in court. The financial aspect of urban LASs is suffering due to property undervaluation and low revenue collection. Manual data and record keeping in LASs further complicate the system, with 87 percent of all respondents interested in innovating the urban LAS using modern technologies. Furthermore, 92 percent of all respondents expressed the need to standardize the existing LASs. There is a lack of capacity and skills, and 89 percent of organizations’ respondents believe that human resources skilled in Geographical Information Systems (GIS) and Remote Sensing (RS) can improve the efficiency of urban LASs. There is a lack of partnership among LAS organizations and a gap in the accessibility of LAS-related quality information. The country’s vision of building smart cities can be realized through LAS standardization and 3D and GIS innovation.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad Sheraz Ahsan & Ejaz Hussain & Zahir Ali & Jaap Zevenbergen & Salman Atif & Mila Koeva & Abdul Waheed, 2023. "Assessing the Status and Challenges of Urban Land Administration Systems Using Framework for Effective Land Administration (FELA): A Case Study in Pakistan," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-27, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:8:p:1560-:d:1211665
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/8/1560/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/8/1560/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rajabifard, Abbas & Atazadeh, Behnam & Kalantari, Mohsen & Olfat, Hamed & Shojaei, Davood & Badiee, Farshad, 2021. "Design and development of an LADM-driven 3D Land administration system: Lessons learned in Malaysia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    2. Mila Koeva & Mohammed Imaduddin Humayun & Christian Timm & Claudia Stöcker & Sophie Crommelinck & Malumbo Chipofya & Rohan Bennett & Jaap Zevenbergen, 2021. "Geospatial Tool and Geocloud Platform Innovations: A Fit-for-Purpose Land Administration Assessment," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-23, May.
    3. Rohan Mark Bennett & Eva-Maria Unger & Christiaan Lemmen & Paula Dijkstra, 2021. "Land Administration Maintenance: A Review of the Persistent Problem and Emerging Fit-for-Purpose Solutions," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-18, May.
    4. Unger, Eva-Maria & Bennett, Rohan & Lemmen, Christiaan & de Zeeuw, Kees & Zevenbergen, Jaap & Teo, CheeHai & Crompvoets, Joep, 2020. "Global policy transfer for land administration and disaster risk management," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    5. Larsson, Karolina & Paasch, Jesper M. & Paulsson, Jenny, 2020. "Representation of 3D cadastral boundaries - From analogue to digital," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    6. Tomáš Peráček & Mária Srebalová & Andrej Srebala, 2022. "The Valuation of Land in Land Consolidation and Relevant Administrative Procedures in the Conditions of the Slovak Republic," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-14, November.
    7. van Oosterom, Peter & Bennett, Rohan & Koeva, Mila & Lemmen, Christiaan, 2020. "3D Land Administration for 3D Land Uses," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    8. Stöcker, Claudia & Bennett, Rohan & Koeva, Mila & Nex, Francesco & Zevenbergen, Jaap, 2022. "Scaling up UAVs for land administration: Towards the plateau of productivity," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    9. Adad, Moulay Abdeslam & Semlali, El Hassane & El-Ayachi, Moha & Ibannain, Fatiha, 2020. "Supporting land data integration and standardization through the LADM standard: Case of Morocco’s country profile MA-LADM," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    10. ., 2022. "The Legal-Economic Performance framework," Chapters, in: The Legal Foundations of Micro-Institutional Performance, chapter 4, pages 86-116, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    11. Lubna Hasan, 2022. "Strategies to Improve Revenue Generation for Islamabad Metropolitan Corporation (Policy)," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 61(3), pages 511-517.
    12. Wani, Shahrukh & Shaikh, Hina & Harman, Oliver, 2020. "Urban property taxes in Pakistan's Punjab," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 108451, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    13. Muhammad Qadeer ul Hussnain & Abdul Waheed & Khydija Wakil & Christopher James Pettit & Ejaz Hussain & Malik Asghar Naeem & Ghulam Abbas Anjum, 2020. "Shaping up the Future Spatial Plans for Urban Areas in Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-21, May.
    14. Asiama, Kwabena Obeng & Voss, Winrich & Bennett, Rohan & Rubanje, Innocent, 2021. "Land consolidation activities in Sub-Saharan Africa towards the agenda 2030: A tale of three countries," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    15. Nadeem Ul Haque & Nadeem Khurshid, 2023. "Construction without Real Estate Development (Article)," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 62(1), pages 1-14.
    16. Ghawana, Tarun & Sargent, Jason & Bennett, Rohan Mark & Zevenbergen, Jaap & Khandelwal, Pradeep & Rahman, Subu, 2020. "3D Cadastres in India: Examining the status and potential for land administration and management in Delhi," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    17. Hendriks, Bob & Zevenbergen, Jaap & Bennett, Rohan & Antonio, Danilo, 2019. "Pro-poor land administration: Towards practical, coordinated, and scalable recording systems for all," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 21-38.
    18. Tomić, Hrvoje & Ivić, Siniša Mastelić & Roić, Miodrag & Šiško, Josip, 2021. "Developing an efficient property valuation system using the LADM valuation information model: A Croatian case study," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    19. Ramlakhan, Rohit & Kalogianni, Eftychia & van Oosterom, Peter & Atazadeh, Behnam, 2023. "Modelling the legal spaces of 3D underground objects in 3D land administration systems," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    20. Okembo, Clifford & Lemmen, Christiaan & Kuria, David & Zevenbergen, Jaap, 2022. "Developing an adapted land administration domain model profile for Kenya," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    21. Asmat Ali & Muhammad Imran, 2021. "National Spatial Data Infrastructure vs Cadastre System for Economic Development: Evidence from Pakistan," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-17, February.
    22. Tarun Ghawana & Karel Janečka & Sisi Zlatanova, 2021. "Development of 3D Spatial Database Enabled IT Framework for Land Agencies: Case Studies of Delhi, India and Prague, Czech Republic," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-23, March.
    23. Aydinoglu, Arif Cagdas & Bovkir, Rabia, 2017. "Generic land registry and cadastre data model supporting interoperability based on international standards for Turkey," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 59-71.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guler, Dogus & Yomralioglu, Tahsin, 2022. "Reviewing the literature on the tripartite cycle containing digital building permit, 3D city modeling, and 3D property ownership," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    2. Jarosław Bydłosz & Agnieszka Bieda, 2020. "Developing a UML Model for the 3D Cadastre in Poland," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-16, November.
    3. van Oosterom, Peter & Unger, Eva-Maria & Lemmen, Christiaan, 2022. "The second themed article collection on the land administration domain model (LADM)," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    4. Atazadeh, Behnam & Olfat, Hamed & Rajabifard, Abbas & Kalantari, Mohsen & Shojaei, Davood & Marjani, Afshin Mesbah, 2021. "Linking Land Administration Domain Model and BIM environment for 3D digital cadastre in multi-storey buildings," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    5. Pierre-François Blin & Trias Aditya & Purnama Budi Santosa & Christophe Claramunt, 2023. "A Methodological Approach towards Cyber Risk Management in Land Administrations Systems," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-17, December.
    6. Stig Enemark & Robin McLaren & Christiaan Lemmen, 2021. "Fit-for-Purpose Land Administration—Providing Secure Land Rights at Scale," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-12, September.
    7. Mekonnen Tesfaye Metaferia & Rohan Mark Bennett & Berhanu Kefale Alemie & Mila Koeva, 2022. "Fit-for-Purpose Land Administration and the Framework for Effective Land Administration: Synthesis of Contemporary Experiences," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-25, December.
    8. Rohan Mark Bennett & Eva-Maria Unger & Christiaan Lemmen & Paula Dijkstra, 2021. "Land Administration Maintenance: A Review of the Persistent Problem and Emerging Fit-for-Purpose Solutions," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-18, May.
    9. Guler, Dogus & Yomralioglu, Tahsin, 2021. "A reformative framework for processes from building permit issuing to property ownership in Turkey," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    10. Munkhbaatar Buuveibaatar & Kangjae Lee & Wonhee Lee, 2022. "Implementation of the LADM-Based Cadastral Model for Mongolia towards Transition to a 3D Cadastre," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-18, November.
    11. Rohan Mark Bennett & Jerome Donovan & Eryadi Masli & Kirsikka Riekkinen, 2023. "Land Administration As-A-Service: Relevance, Applications, and Models," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, January.
    12. Unger, Eva-Maria & Lemmen, Christiaan & Bennett, Rohan, 2023. "Women’s access to land and the Land Administration Domain Model (LADM): Requirements, modelling and assessment," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    13. Bujar Fetai & Jernej Tekavec & Mojca Kosmatin Fras & Anka Lisec, 2022. "Inconsistencies in Cadastral Boundary Data—Digitisation and Maintenance," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-19, December.
    14. Przemysław Leń & Klaudia Maciąg & Michał Maciąg & Justyna Wójcik-Leń & Katarzyna Kocur-Bera, 2023. "Automated Processing of Data in the Comparative Estimation of Land Value during Land Consolidation Works," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-13, May.
    15. Gholipour, Hassan F. & Arjomandi, Amir & Andargoli, Amirhossein Eslami & Bennett, Rohan, 2023. "On real estate market transparency: The relationship with ICT trade and investment," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    16. Naghavi, Mohammad & Alesheikh, Ali A. & Hakimpour, Farshad & Vahidnia, Mohammad H. & Vafaeinejad, Alireza, 2022. "VGI-based spatial data infrastructure for land administration," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    17. Hajji, Rafika & El Asri, Hanae & Ez-Zriouli, Chaymae, 2023. "Upgrading to 3D cadastre in Morocco: Lessons learned from benchmarking of international 3D cadastral systems," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    18. Radulović, Aleksandra & Sladić, Dubravka & Govedarica, Miro & Raičević, Dušan, 2023. "Using LADM and BIM for property and tourist taxation in the municipality of Bar, Montenegro," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    19. Simon Hull & Harold Liversage & Maria Paola Rizzo & Vladimir Evtimov, 2022. "An Overview of Frontier Technologies for Land Tenure: How to Avoid the Hype and Focus on What Matters," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-15, October.
    20. Stöcker, Claudia & Bennett, Rohan & Koeva, Mila & Nex, Francesco & Zevenbergen, Jaap, 2022. "Scaling up UAVs for land administration: Towards the plateau of productivity," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:8:p:1560-:d:1211665. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.