IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v109y2021ics0264837721003926.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Appropriate policy-making for rural regions management in Iran

Author

Listed:
  • Afsharipour, Ali
  • Barghi, Hamid
  • Ghanbari, Yosef

Abstract

The development of rural areas, from various aspects, has always been of interest for researchers in less developed communities. These studies, according to the way governments look at development issues, have led the governments to make decisions and implement plans for how to manage rural areas (called politics); the process of studying, planning, as well as making decision and ultimately implementation in the rural environment is called rural policy-making. In Iran, different decisions have always been made to develop rural areas. In this study, we sought to identify the characteristics of policy-making and governance of rural areas and to understand the causes of their inefficiency in order to provide an appropriate model for policy-making and management of rural areas in Iran. Using thematic analysis, the themes of policy-making for managing the rural areas of Iran were investigated. The data were collected through semi-structured interviews and studying the related documents. The findings showed three categories of pervasive themes: contexts; influential factors, and outcome dimensions. These three shape the basic concepts and organize themes for appropriate policy-making. In fact, based on the results, policy is appropriate for managing Iran's rural areas; it pays attention to the context and specific characteristics of the rural identity and environment, considers the role of external factors in decision-making and policy outcomes, is aware of the consequences of the previous policies, and leads to stability in policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Afsharipour, Ali & Barghi, Hamid & Ghanbari, Yosef, 2021. "Appropriate policy-making for rural regions management in Iran," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:109:y:2021:i:c:s0264837721003926
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105669
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837721003926
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105669?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. De Janvry, Alain & Sadoulet, Elisabeth & Murgai, Rinku, 2002. "Rural development and rural policy," Handbook of Agricultural Economics, in: B. L. Gardner & G. C. Rausser (ed.), Handbook of Agricultural Economics, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 31, pages 1593-1658, Elsevier.
    2. Jakub Straka & Marcela Tuzová, 2016. "Factors Affecting Development of Rural Areas in the Czech Republic: a Literature Review," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 64(6), pages 2141-2150.
    3. Kosec, Katrina & Wantchekon, Leonard, 2020. "Can information improve rural governance and service delivery?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    4. Walker, Daniel H., 2002. "Decision support, learning and rural resource management," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 73(1), pages 113-127, July.
    5. Gustavo Anríquez & Libor Stloukal, 2008. "Rural Population Change in Developing Countries:Lessons for Policymaking," Working Papers 08-09, Agricultural and Development Economics Division of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO - ESA).
    6. Eckart Ehlers, 1983. "Rent-capitalism and Unequal Development in the Middle East: the Case of Iran," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Frances Stewart (ed.), Work, Income and Inequality, chapter 2, pages 32-61, Palgrave Macmillan.
    7. Shen, Mingrui & Shen, Jianfa, 2018. "Evaluating the cooperative and family farm programs in China: A rural governance perspective," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 240-250.
    8. Md Nazirul Islam Sarker* & Md Altab Hossin & Wu Min & Md Aktaruzzaman, 2018. "Poverty Alleviation of Rural People through Good Governance in Bangladesh," The Journal of Social Sciences Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, vol. 4(12), pages 547-555, 12-2018.
    9. Ho, Samuel P. S., 1982. "Economic development and rural industry in South Korea and Taiwan," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 10(11), pages 973-990, November.
    10. Terry Marsden & Jo Banks & Gillian Bristow, 2002. "The Social Management of Rural Nature: Understanding Agrarian-Based Rural Development," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 34(5), pages 809-825, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ma, Jun & Gao, Huixian & Cheng, Changgao & Fang, Zhou & Zhou, Qin & Zhou, Haiwei, 2023. "What influences the behavior of farmers' participation in agricultural nonpoint source pollution control?—Evidence from a farmer survey in Huai'an, China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 281(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Megan Swindal & Gilbert Gillespie & Rick Welsh, 2010. "Community digester operations and dairy farmer perspectives," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 27(4), pages 461-474, December.
    2. Costa, Lorena Vieira & Helfand, Steven M. & Souza, André Portela, 2018. "No impact of rural development policies?: no synergies with conditional cash transfers?: an investigation of the IFAD-Supported Gavião Project in Brazil," Textos para discussão 489, FGV EESP - Escola de Economia de São Paulo, Fundação Getulio Vargas (Brazil).
    3. Mirosław Biczkowski & Aleksandra Jezierska-Thöle & Roman Rudnicki, 2021. "The Impact of RDP Measures on the Diversification of Agriculture and Rural Development—Seeking Additional Livelihoods: The Case of Poland," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-26, March.
    4. repec:arp:tjssrr:2019:p:1103-1115 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Kristensen, Søren Bech Pilgaard & Præstholm, Søren & Busck, Anne Gravsholt & Winther, Lars & Fertner, Christian & Vesterager, Jens Peter & Vejre, Henrik, 2019. "On-farm Business Structure Diversification in Greater Copenhagen—Farmers in an urban landscape or entrepreneurs in a rural landscape?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    6. Gaduh,Arya Budhiastra & Pradhan,Menno Prasad & Priebe,Jan & Susanti,Dewi, 2021. "Scores, Camera, Action : Social Accountability and Teacher Incentives in Remote Areas," Policy Research Working Paper Series 9748, The World Bank.
    7. Siew, Tuck Fatt, 2008. "Transferable decision-making procedure for integrated flood management: A theoretical approach to the micro studies of human decision-making and decision makers heuristics," Working Papers 49-2008, University of Freiburg, Chair of Forestry Economics and Planning.
    8. Sterk, B. & van Ittersum, M.K. & Leeuwis, C. & Rossing, W.A.H. & van Keulen, H. & van de Ven, G.W.J., 2006. "Finding niches for whole-farm design models - contradictio in terminis?," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 87(2), pages 211-228, February.
    9. Brian Ilbery & Damian Maye, 2005. "Alternative (Shorter) Food Supply Chains and Specialist Livestock Products in the Scottish–English Borders," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 37(5), pages 823-844, May.
    10. Yves Léon & . Agricultural Economics Society, 2003. "The evolving role of agricultural economists in policy-related research in the rural economy," Post-Print hal-01931645, HAL.
    11. Mikaël Akimowicz & S. Ashleigh Weeden & Ryan Gibson, 2023. "Searching for a conceptual nexus? A critical analysis of community, place, and territorial approaches to rural development," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 71(1), pages 9-26, August.
    12. Thi Nga Bui & An Ha Nguyen & Thi Thu Huong Le & Van Phuong Nguyen & Thi Thanh Hao Le & Thi Thanh Huyen Tran & Ngoc Mai Nguyen & Thi Kim Oanh Le & Thi Kim Oanh Nguyen & Thi Thu Trang Nguyen & Hong Van , 2021. "Can a Short Food Supply Chain Create Sustainable Benefits for Small Farmers in Developing Countries? An Exploratory Study of Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-18, February.
    13. Maurer, Markus & Haolader, Faruque A. & Shimu, Sheikh Shahana, 2023. "VET for all: Assessing the case of Bangladesh," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    14. Yixiang Chen & Xiangmu Jin, 2023. "How Do Farmers Realize Their Rights on the Collective Land in Rural China? An Explanatory Framework for Deconstructing the Subject of Collective Land Ownership," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-17, September.
    15. Jean-Luc Kok & Sebastian Kofalk & Jürgen Berlekamp & Bernhard Hahn & Herman Wind, 2009. "From Design to Application of a Decision-support System for Integrated River-basin Management," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 23(9), pages 1781-1811, July.
    16. O'Rourke Eileen & Kramm Nadine, 2012. "High nature value (HNV) farming and the management of upland diversity. A review," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 4(2), pages 116-133, January.
    17. Casolani, Nicola & Nissi, Eugenia & Giampaolo, Antonio & Liberatore, Lolita, 2021. "Evaluating the effects of European support measures for Italian organic farms," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    18. Maurer, Markus & Morshed, Mohammad Mahboob, 2022. "Promoting the recognition of prior learning in the context of development cooperation: The case of Bangladesh," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    19. James P. Robson & Sarah J. Wilson & Constanza Mora Sanchez & Anita Bhatt, 2020. "Youth and the Future of Community Forestry," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-24, October.
    20. Kaufmann, Brigitte A., 2011. "Second-order cybernetics as a tool to understand why pastoralists do what they do," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 104(9), pages 655-665.
    21. Vincenzo Di Maro & Stefan Leeffers & Danila Serra & Pedro C. Vicente, 2020. "Mobilizing parents at home and at school: an experiment on primary education in Angola," NOVAFRICA Working Paper Series wp2002, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Nova School of Business and Economics, NOVAFRICA.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:109:y:2021:i:c:s0264837721003926. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.