IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/juipol/v77y2022ics095717872200056x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Design and implementation of a competitive framework for a day-ahead demand-response program in Iran

Author

Listed:
  • Saebi, Javad
  • Ghasemi, Abolfazl
  • Hojjat, Mehrdad

Abstract

To replace traditional demand-side management (DSM) programs with demand-response (DR) programs, market operators have considered market-based DR. In recent years, Iran's power system has faced increasing pressure to meet the total demand, especially in warm seasons. In this regard, DSM activities have become an important tool used by Iran's power system operator for peak reduction purposes. However, there are concerns regarding the implementation of these activities, such as fair remuneration of participants, the efficiency of these programs, and customers' motivation to participate. Therefore, Iran's power system operator has started transitioning from traditional DSM activities to modern DR programs, i.e., market-based DR. Khorasan Regional Electricity Company (KREC) has taken the first step to design and implement such a market-based DR program in Iran. Hence, this paper focuses on designing and implementing a proposed day-ahead DR (DADR) program in KREC. The framework, timeline, and mathematical formulation for the clearance of the proposed DADRP via a pool-based environment are presented. Industrial customers have chosen to participate in the market in the first phase of implementing the DADRP. The real case of KREC is used to show the feasibility and efficiency of the proposed model. The results show that the proposed model can effectively determine the optimal market configuration to meet DR demand, delivering more than KREC's current DR program.

Suggested Citation

  • Saebi, Javad & Ghasemi, Abolfazl & Hojjat, Mehrdad, 2022. "Design and implementation of a competitive framework for a day-ahead demand-response program in Iran," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:juipol:v:77:y:2022:i:c:s095717872200056x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jup.2022.101391
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095717872200056X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jup.2022.101391?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xu Chen and Andrew N. Kleit, 2016. "Money for Nothing? Why FERC Order 745 Should have Died," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 2).
    2. Neenan, Bernie & Boisvert, Richard N. & Cappers, Peter A., 2002. "What Makes a Customer Price Responsive?," The Electricity Journal, Elsevier, vol. 15(3), pages 52-59, April.
    3. Richstein, Jörn C. & Hosseinioun, Seyed Saeed, 2020. "Industrial demand response: How network tariffs and regulation (do not) impact flexibility provision in electricity markets and reserves," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 278.
    4. Sousa, Joana & Soares, Isabel, 2020. "Demand response, market design and risk: A literature review," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    5. Shariatzadeh, Farshid & Mandal, Paras & Srivastava, Anurag K., 2015. "Demand response for sustainable energy systems: A review, application and implementation strategy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 343-350.
    6. Cappers, Peter & Goldman, Charles & Kathan, David, 2010. "Demand response in U.S. electricity markets: Empirical evidence," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 1526-1535.
    7. Shahryari, E. & Shayeghi, H. & Mohammadi-ivatloo, B. & Moradzadeh, M., 2018. "An improved incentive-based demand response program in day-ahead and intra-day electricity markets," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 205-214.
    8. Jörn C. Richstein & Seyed Saeed Hosseinioun, 2020. "Industrial Demand Response: How Network Tariffs and Regulation Do (Not) Impact Flexibility Provision in Electricity Markets and Reserves," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1853, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    9. Richstein, Jörn C. & Hosseinioun, Seyed Saeed, 2020. "Industrial demand response: How network tariffs and regulation (do not) impact flexibility provision in electricity markets and reserves," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Palaniyappan, Balakumar & T, Vinopraba & Chandrasekaran, Geetha, 2023. "Solving electric power distribution uncertainty using deep learning and incentive-based demand response," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lu, Qing & Zhang, Yufeng, 2022. "A multi-objective optimization model considering users' satisfaction and multi-type demand response in dynamic electricity price," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    2. Stede, Jan & Arnold, Karin & Dufter, Christa & Holtz, Georg & von Roon, Serafin & Richstein, Jörn C., 2020. "The role of aggregators in facilitating industrial demand response: Evidence from Germany," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    3. Andre Leippi & Markus Fleschutz & Michael D. Murphy, 2022. "A Review of EV Battery Utilization in Demand Response Considering Battery Degradation in Non-Residential Vehicle-to-Grid Scenarios," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-22, April.
    4. Jun Dong & Dongran Liu & Xihao Dou & Bo Li & Shiyao Lv & Yuzheng Jiang & Tongtao Ma, 2021. "Key Issues and Technical Applications in the Study of Power Markets as the System Adapts to the New Power System in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-29, December.
    5. Ruhnau, Oliver & Schiele, Johanna, 2023. "Flexible green hydrogen: The effect of relaxing simultaneity requirements on project design, economics, and power sector emissions," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    6. Golmohamadi, Hessam, 2022. "Demand-side management in industrial sector: A review of heavy industries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    7. Jeddi, Samir & Sitzmann, Amelie, 2021. "Network tariffs under different pricing schemes in a dynamically consistent framework," EWI Working Papers 2021-1, Energiewirtschaftliches Institut an der Universitaet zu Koeln (EWI).
    8. Leinauer, Christina & Schott, Paul & Fridgen, Gilbert & Keller, Robert & Ollig, Philipp & Weibelzahl, Martin, 2022. "Obstacles to demand response: Why industrial companies do not adapt their power consumption to volatile power generation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    9. Ribó-Pérez, D. & Carrión, A. & Rodríguez García, J. & Álvarez Bel, C., 2021. "Ex-post evaluation of Interruptible Load programs with a system optimisation perspective," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 303(C).
    10. Lu, Qing & Yu, Hao & Zhao, Kangli & Leng, Yajun & Hou, Jianchao & Xie, Pinjie, 2019. "Residential demand response considering distributed PV consumption: A model based on China's PV policy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 443-456.
    11. Märkle-Huß, Joscha & Feuerriegel, Stefan & Neumann, Dirk, 2018. "Large-scale demand response and its implications for spot prices, load and policies: Insights from the German-Austrian electricity market," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 1290-1298.
    12. Nur Mohammad & Yateendra Mishra, 2018. "The Role of Demand Response Aggregators and the Effect of GenCos Strategic Bidding on the Flexibility of Demand," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-22, November.
    13. Burger, Scott P. & Luke, Max, 2017. "Business models for distributed energy resources: A review and empirical analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 230-248.
    14. Gao, Xiang & Chan, Ka Wing & Xia, Shiwei & Zhou, Bin & Lu, Xi & Xu, Da, 2019. "Risk-constrained offering strategy for a hybrid power plant consisting of wind power producer and electric vehicle aggregator," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 183-191.
    15. Guo, Peiyang & Li, Victor O.K. & Lam, Jacqueline C.K., 2017. "Smart demand response in China: Challenges and drivers," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 1-10.
    16. Nafisi, Amin & Arababadi, Reza & Moazami, Amin & Mahapatra, Krushna, 2022. "Economic and emission analysis of running emergency generators in the presence of demand response programs," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    17. Wai Choi & Anindya Sen & Adam White, 2011. "Response of industrial customers to hourly pricing in Ontario’s deregulated electricity market," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 40(3), pages 303-323, December.
    18. McPherson, Madeleine & Stoll, Brady, 2020. "Demand response for variable renewable energy integration: A proposed approach and its impacts," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    19. Dong, Jun & Xue, Guiyuan & Li, Rong, 2016. "Demand response in China: Regulations, pilot projects and recommendations – A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 13-27.
    20. Meyabadi, A. Fattahi & Deihimi, M.H., 2017. "A review of demand-side management: Reconsidering theoretical framework," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 367-379.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:juipol:v:77:y:2022:i:c:s095717872200056x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/utilities-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.