IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jotrge/v18y2010i4p530-547.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Intermodal containerized shipping in foreign trade and regional accessibility advantages

Author

Listed:
  • Thill, Jean-Claude
  • Lim, Hyunwoo

Abstract

Intermodalism has become one of the most significant transformations of freight transportation in the United States over the past two decades. The coupling of shipping modes has enabled shippers to more fully realize the respective time and costs advantages of respective modes. The opportunity to take advantage of intermodalism when shipping manufactured goods overseas may provide an essential competitive edge to a company or to an entire region engaged in world commerce. The change in the freight accessibility map of the United States to foreign markets that can be ascribed to intermodal infrastructures and operations has so far not been studied. With the help of a geographic information system, this paper analyzes this transformation in the United States by mapping integral place accessibility measures of five-digit zip code areas with respect to gateways for export of manufactured goods, especially containerized freight. The performance of the intermodal freight network is evaluated by comparing accessibility measures based on the highway network and on the intermodal network, respectively, for all North American container ports, as well as for subgroups of container ports on the Eastern Seaboard, the Western Seaboard, and the Gulf Coast of North America. The paper discusses regional winners and losers in the new national freight transportation system.

Suggested Citation

  • Thill, Jean-Claude & Lim, Hyunwoo, 2010. "Intermodal containerized shipping in foreign trade and regional accessibility advantages," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 18(4), pages 530-547.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jotrge:v:18:y:2010:i:4:p:530-547
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2010.03.010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966692310000426
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2010.03.010?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thomas R. Leinbach & Cristina Capineri, 2007. "The Global Economy and Freight Transport Flows," Chapters, in: Thomas R. Leinbach & Cristina Capineri (ed.), Globalized Freight Transport, chapter 1, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    2. Jean-Claude Thill & Marim Kim, 2005. "Trip making, induced travel demand, and accessibility," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 7(2), pages 229-248, June.
    3. Philip McCann, 1998. "The Economics of Industrial Location," Advances in Spatial Science, Springer, number 978-3-662-03702-7, Fall.
    4. Macharis, Cathy & Pekin, Ethem, 2009. "Assessing policy measures for the stimulation of intermodal transport: a GIS-based policy analysis," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 17(6), pages 500-508.
    5. Amy Helling & Theodore H. Poister, 2000. "U.S. Maritime Ports: Trends, Policy Implications, and Research Needs," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 14(3), pages 300-317, August.
    6. Theo E. Notteboom * & Jean-Paul Rodrigue, 2005. "Port regionalization: towards a new phase in port development," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(3), pages 297-313, July.
    7. Rodrigue, Jean-Paul, 2008. "The Thruport concept and transmodal rail freight distribution in North America," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 16(4), pages 233-246.
    8. Hyunwoo Lim & Jean-Claude Thill, 2008. "Intermodal Freight Transportation and Regional Accessibility in the United States," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 40(8), pages 2006-2025, August.
    9. Cristina Capineri & Thomas R. Leinbach, 2007. "Globalized Freight Transport: Conclusions and Future Research," Chapters, in: Thomas R. Leinbach & Cristina Capineri (ed.), Globalized Freight Transport, chapter 10, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    10. Notteboom Theo E., 2004. "Container Shipping And Ports: An Overview," Review of Network Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 3(2), pages 1-21, June.
    11. L.A. Tavasszy & .C.J. Ruijgrok & M.J.P.M. Thissen, 2003. "Emerging Global Logistics Networks: Implications for Transport Systems and Policies," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(4), pages 456-472, September.
    12. Michael Beuthe, 2007. "Intermodal Freight Transport in Europe," Chapters, in: Thomas R. Leinbach & Cristina Capineri (ed.), Globalized Freight Transport, chapter 3, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    13. F Bruinsma & P Rietveld, 1998. "The Accessibility of European Cities: Theoretical Framework and Comparison of Approaches," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 30(3), pages 499-521, March.
    14. Jean‐Paul Rodrigue, 2004. "Freight, Gateways And Mega‐Urban Regions: The Logistical Integration Of The Bostwash Corridor1," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 95(2), pages 147-161, April.
    15. John T. Bowen & Brian Slack, 2007. "Shifting Modes and Spatial Flows in North American Freight Transportation," Chapters, in: Thomas R. Leinbach & Cristina Capineri (ed.), Globalized Freight Transport, chapter 2, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Deng, Ping & Song, Lian & Xiao, Ruiqi & Huang, Chengfeng, 2022. "Evaluation of logistics and port connectivity in the Yangtze River Economic Belt of China," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 249-267.
    2. Liquan Guo & Zhongzhen Yang, 2019. "Relationship Between Shipping Accessibility and Maritime Transport Demand: the Case of Mainland China," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 149-175, March.
    3. Santos, Tiago A. & Guedes Soares, C., 2019. "Container terminal potential hinterland delimitation in a multi-port system subject to a regionalization process," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 132-146.
    4. Khalili, Fatemeh Bagheri & Antunes, António Pais & Mohaymany, Afshin Shariat, 2020. "Evaluating interregional freight accessibility conditions through the combination of centrality and reliability measures," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    5. Lam, Jasmine Siu Lee & Gu, Yimiao, 2016. "A market-oriented approach for intermodal network optimisation meeting cost, time and environmental requirements," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 171(P2), pages 266-274.
    6. Abdolrasoul Ghasemi & Elnaz Miandoabchi & Shiva Soroushnia, 2021. "The attractiveness of seaport-based transport corridors: an integrated approach based on scenario planning and gravity models," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 23(3), pages 522-547, September.
    7. Weichen Liu & Weixiao Chen & Youhui Cao, 2023. "The Evolution of the Waterfront Utilization and Sustainable Development of the Container Ports in the Yangtze River: A Case Study of the Yangtze River Delta," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, March.
    8. Verhetsel, Ann & Kessels, Roselinde & Goos, Peter & Zijlstra, Toon & Blomme, Nele & Cant, Jeroen, 2015. "Location of logistics companies: a stated preference study to disentangle the impact of accessibility," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 110-121.
    9. Thomas Vanoutrive, 2012. "Explaining Port Size: Accessibility, Hinterland Competition and a Semi-Endogenously Determined W," ERSA conference papers ersa12p668, European Regional Science Association.
    10. Koi Yu Adolf Ng & César Ducruet, 2014. "The changing tides of port geography (1950–2012)," Post-Print halshs-01359160, HAL.
    11. Baştuğ, Sedat & Şakar, Gül Denktaş & Gülmez, Seçil, 2020. "An application of brand personality dimensions to container ports: A place branding perspective," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    12. Min Dong & Yuhao Li & Xinglu Xu & Yaping Zha, 2022. "A Practical Accessibility Evaluation Method for Port-Centric Coal Transportation Chains: Considering the Environment and Operational Adaptability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-20, September.
    13. van den Heuvel, Frank P. & Rivera, Liliana & van Donselaar, Karel H. & de Jong, Ad & Sheffi, Yossi & de Langen, Peter W. & Fransoo, Jan C., 2014. "Relationship between freight accessibility and logistics employment in US counties," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 91-105.
    14. Guo, Jianke & Wang, Ziqi & Yu, Xuhui, 2022. "Accessibility measurement of China's coastal ports from a land-sea coordination perspective - An empirical study," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    15. Yang, Jinglei & Luo, Meifeng & Ji, Abing, 2016. "Analyzing the spatial–temporal evolution of a gateway’s hinterland: A case study of Shanghai, China," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 355-367.
    16. Tadić, Snežana & Krstić, Mladen & Brnjac, Nikolina, 2019. "Selection of efficient types of inland intermodal terminals," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 170-180.
    17. T. A. Santos & G. Lopes Santos & P. Martins & C. Guedes Soares, 2022. "A methodology for short-sea-shipping service design within intermodal transport chains," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 24(1), pages 138-167, March.
    18. Tiller, Kara Carroll & Thill, Jean-Claude, 2017. "Spatial patterns of landside trade impedance in containerized South American exports," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 272-285.
    19. Wang, Grace W.Y. & Zeng, Qingcheng & Li, Kevin & Yang, Jinglei, 2016. "Port connectivity in a logistic network: The case of Bohai Bay, China," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 341-354.
    20. Halim, Ronald A. & Kwakkel, Jan H. & Tavasszy, Lóránt A., 2016. "A strategic model of port-hinterland freight distribution networks," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 368-384.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Genevieve Giuliano & Sanggyun Kang & Quan Yuan, 2018. "Using proxies to describe the metropolitan freight landscape," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(6), pages 1346-1363, May.
    2. Rodrigue, Jean-Paul, 2008. "The Thruport concept and transmodal rail freight distribution in North America," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 16(4), pages 233-246.
    3. Kang, Sanggyun, 2020. "Warehouse location choice: A case study in Los Angeles, CA," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    4. Kang, Sanggyun, 2020. "Why do warehouses decentralize more in certain metropolitan areas?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    5. Witte, Patrick & Wiegmans, Bart & Ng, Adolf K.Y., 2019. "A critical review on the evolution and development of inland port research," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 53-61.
    6. Erica Varese & Danilo Stefano Marigo & Mariarosaria Lombardi, 2020. "Dry Port: A Review on Concept, Classification, Functionalities and Technological Processes," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-16, November.
    7. Wu, Zhen & Woo, Su-Han & Lai, Po-Lin & Chen, Xiaoyi, 2022. "The economic impact of inland ports on regional development: Evidence from the Yangtze River region," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 80-91.
    8. van Asperen, E. & Dekker, R., 2010. "Flexibility in Port Selection: A Quantitative Approach Using Floating Stocks," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2009-44, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    9. Yang, Jinglei & Luo, Meifeng & Ji, Abing, 2016. "Analyzing the spatial–temporal evolution of a gateway’s hinterland: A case study of Shanghai, China," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 355-367.
    10. David Jaffee, 2015. "‘A Deeper Channel Floats all Boats’: The Port Economy as Urban Growth Engine," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 47(4), pages 783-800, April.
    11. Dadashpoor, Hashem & Arasteh, Mojtaba, 2020. "Core-port connectivity: Towards shaping a national hinterland in a West Asia country," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 57-68.
    12. Parola, Francesco & Veenstra, Albert W., 2008. "The spatial coverage of shipping lines and container terminal operators," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 16(4), pages 292-299.
    13. César Ducruet & Theo E. Notteboom, 2012. "The worldwide maritime network of container shipping: Spatial structure and regional dynamics," Post-Print halshs-00538051, HAL.
    14. Kim, Nam Seok & Van Wee, Bert, 2011. "The relative importance of factors that influence the break-even distance of intermodal freight transport systems," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 859-875.
    15. Santos, Tiago A. & Guedes Soares, C., 2019. "Container terminal potential hinterland delimitation in a multi-port system subject to a regionalization process," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 132-146.
    16. Flämig, Heike & Hesse, Markus, 2011. "Placing dryports. Port regionalization as a planning challenge – The case of Hamburg, Germany, and the Süderelbe," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 42-50.
    17. Tan, Zhijia & Meng, Qiang & Wang, Fan & Kuang, Hai-bo, 2018. "Strategic integration of the inland port and shipping service for the ocean carrier," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 90-109.
    18. Ducruet, César & Rozenblat, Céline & Zaidi, Faraz, 2010. "Ports in multi-level maritime networks: evidence from the Atlantic (1996–2006)," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 18(4), pages 508-518.
    19. Witte, Patrick & Wiegmans, Bart & van Oort, Frank & Spit, Tejo, 2014. "Governing inland ports: a multi-dimensional approach to addressing inland port–city challenges in European transport corridors," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 42-52.
    20. Monios, Jason & Wilmsmeier, Gordon, 2013. "The role of intermodal transport in port regionalisation," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 161-172.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jotrge:v:18:y:2010:i:4:p:530-547. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-transport-geography .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.