IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jmvana/v130y2014icp176-193.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Goodness of fit tests for linear mixed models

Author

Listed:
  • Tang, Min
  • Slud, Eric V.
  • Pfeiffer, Ruth M.

Abstract

Linear mixed models (LMMs) are widely used for regression analysis of data that are assumed to be clustered or correlated. Assessing model fit is important for valid inference but to date no confirmatory tests are available to assess the adequacy of the fixed effects part of LMMs against general alternatives. We therefore propose a class of goodness-of-fit tests for the mean structure of LMMs. Our test statistic is a quadratic form of the difference between observed values and the values expected under the estimated model in cells defined by a partition of the covariate space. We show that this test statistic has an asymptotic chi-squared distribution when model parameters are estimated by maximum likelihood or by least squares and method of moments, and study its power under local alternatives both analytically and in simulations. Data on repeated measurements of thyroglobulin from individuals exposed to the accident at the Chernobyl power plant in 1986 are used to illustrate the proposed test.

Suggested Citation

  • Tang, Min & Slud, Eric V. & Pfeiffer, Ruth M., 2014. "Goodness of fit tests for linear mixed models," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 176-193.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jmvana:v:130:y:2014:i:c:p:176-193
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jmva.2014.03.012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047259X14000682
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jmva.2014.03.012?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christian Ritz, 2004. "Goodness‐of‐fit Tests for Mixed Models," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 31(3), pages 443-458, September.
    2. Zhiying Pan & D. Y. Lin, 2005. "Goodness-of-Fit Methods for Generalized Linear Mixed Models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 61(4), pages 1000-1009, December.
    3. Maydeu-Olivares, Albert & Joe, Harry, 2005. "Limited- and Full-Information Estimation and Goodness-of-Fit Testing in 2n Contingency Tables: A Unified Framework," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 100, pages 1009-1020, September.
    4. Albert Maydeu-Olivares & Harry Joe, 2006. "Limited Information Goodness-of-fit Testing in Multidimensional Contingency Tables," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 71(4), pages 713-732, December.
    5. Gerda Claeskens & Jeffrey Hart, 2009. "Rejoinder on: Goodness-of-fit tests in mixed models," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 18(2), pages 265-270, August.
    6. Vaart,A. W. van der, 2000. "Asymptotic Statistics," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521784504.
    7. María José Lombardía & Stefan Sperlich, 2008. "Semiparametric inference in generalized mixed effects models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 70(5), pages 913-930, November.
    8. Ciprian M. Crainiceanu & David Ruppert, 2004. "Likelihood ratio tests in linear mixed models with one variance component," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 66(1), pages 165-185, February.
    9. Wand, M.P., 2007. "Fisher information for generalised linear mixed models," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 98(7), pages 1412-1416, August.
    10. Luigi Salmaso & Aldo Solari, 2005. "Multiple aspect testing for case-control designs," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 62(2), pages 331-340, November.
    11. Gerda Claeskens & Jeffrey Hart, 2009. "Goodness-of-fit tests in mixed models," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 18(2), pages 213-239, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. David McGhie & Øyvind Sandbakk & Sindre Østerås & Gertjan Ettema, 2019. "Is There a Trade-Off Between Maximum Jumping and Throwing Capability in the Handball Jump Throw?," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(3), pages 21582440198, July.
    2. Jakob Peterlin & Nataša Kejžar & Rok Blagus, 2023. "Correct specification of design matrices in linear mixed effects models: tests with graphical representation," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 32(1), pages 184-210, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gonzales Manteiga, Wenceslao & Maria Dolores, Martinez Miranda & Van Keilegom, Ingrid, 2012. "Goodness-of-fit Test in Parametric Mixed-Effects Models based on the Estimation of the Error Distribution," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2012022, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    2. Jakob Peterlin & Nataša Kejžar & Rok Blagus, 2023. "Correct specification of design matrices in linear mixed effects models: tests with graphical representation," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 32(1), pages 184-210, March.
    3. Reza Drikvandi & Geert Verbeke & Geert Molenberghs, 2017. "Diagnosing misspecification of the random-effects distribution in mixed models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 73(1), pages 63-71, March.
    4. Shun Yu & Xianzheng Huang, 2017. "Random-intercept misspecification in generalized linear mixed models for binary responses," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 26(3), pages 333-359, August.
    5. González Manteiga, Wenceslao & Lombardía, María José & Martínez Miranda, María Dolores & Sperlich, Stefan, 2013. "Kernel smoothers and bootstrapping for semiparametric mixed effects models," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 288-302.
    6. Stefan Sperlich & María José Lombardía, 2010. "Local polynomial inference for small area statistics: estimation, validation and prediction," Journal of Nonparametric Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(5), pages 633-648.
    7. Alberto Maydeu-Olivares & Rosa Montaño, 2013. "How Should We Assess the Fit of Rasch-Type Models? Approximating the Power of Goodness-of-Fit Statistics in Categorical Data Analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 78(1), pages 116-133, January.
    8. Vassilis Vasdekis & Silvia Cagnone & Irini Moustaki, 2012. "A Composite Likelihood Inference in Latent Variable Models for Ordinal Longitudinal Responses," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 77(3), pages 425-441, July.
    9. Chen, Yunxiao & Moustaki, Irini & Zhang, H, 2020. "A note on likelihood ratio tests for models with latent variables," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 107490, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    10. Shun Yu & Xianzheng Huang, 2019. "Link misspecification in generalized linear mixed models with a random intercept for binary responses," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 28(3), pages 827-843, September.
    11. Shaobo Jin & Fan Yang-Wallentin, 2017. "Asymptotic Robustness Study of the Polychoric Correlation Estimation," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 82(1), pages 67-85, March.
    12. Ick Hoon Jin & Minjeong Jeon, 2019. "A Doubly Latent Space Joint Model for Local Item and Person Dependence in the Analysis of Item Response Data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 84(1), pages 236-260, March.
    13. Li Cai, 2010. "A Two-Tier Full-Information Item Factor Analysis Model with Applications," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 75(4), pages 581-612, December.
    14. Kim, Sung-Ho & Choi, Hyemi & Lee, Sangjin, 2009. "Estimate-based goodness-of-fit test for large sparse multinomial distributions," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(4), pages 1122-1131, February.
    15. Salim Moussa, 2016. "A two-step item response theory procedure for a better measurement of marketing constructs," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 4(1), pages 28-50, March.
    16. Yanyuan Ma & Jeffrey D. Hart & Ryan Janicki & Raymond J. Carroll, 2011. "Local and omnibus goodness‐of‐fit tests in classical measurement error models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 73(1), pages 81-98, January.
    17. Harry Joe & Alberto Maydeu-Olivares, 2010. "A General Family of Limited Information Goodness-of-Fit Statistics for Multinomial Data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 75(3), pages 393-419, September.
    18. Stefan Sperlich, 2013. "Comments on: An updated review of Goodness-of-Fit tests for regression models," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 22(3), pages 419-427, September.
    19. Jan-Michael Becker & Christian Ringle & Marko Sarstedt & Franziska Völckner, 2015. "How collinearity affects mixture regression results," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 26(4), pages 643-659, December.
    20. Genest Christian & Puccetti Giovanni, 2018. "A Journey Beyond The Gaussian World: An interview with Harry Joe," Dependence Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 6(1), pages 288-297, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jmvana:v:130:y:2014:i:c:p:176-193. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622892/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.