IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/biomet/v73y2017i1p63-71.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Diagnosing misspecification of the random-effects distribution in mixed models

Author

Listed:
  • Reza Drikvandi
  • Geert Verbeke
  • Geert Molenberghs

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Reza Drikvandi & Geert Verbeke & Geert Molenberghs, 2017. "Diagnosing misspecification of the random-effects distribution in mixed models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 73(1), pages 63-71, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:73:y:2017:i:1:p:63-71
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/biom.12551
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christian Ritz, 2004. "Goodness‐of‐fit Tests for Mixed Models," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 31(3), pages 443-458, September.
    2. Murray Aitkin, 1999. "A General Maximum Likelihood Analysis of Variance Components in Generalized Linear Models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 55(1), pages 117-128, March.
    3. Xianzheng Huang, 2009. "Diagnosis of Random-Effect Model Misspecification in Generalized Linear Mixed Models for Binary Response," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 65(2), pages 361-368, June.
    4. Pan, Jianxin & Thompson, Robin, 2007. "Quasi-Monte Carlo estimation in generalized linear mixed models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(12), pages 5765-5775, August.
    5. Zhiying Pan & D. Y. Lin, 2005. "Goodness-of-Fit Methods for Generalized Linear Mixed Models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 61(4), pages 1000-1009, December.
    6. Daowen Zhang & Marie Davidian, 2001. "Linear Mixed Models with Flexible Distributions of Random Effects for Longitudinal Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 57(3), pages 795-802, September.
    7. Alonso, A. & Litière, S. & Molenberghs, G., 2008. "A family of tests to detect misspecifications in the random-effects structure of generalized linear mixed models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(9), pages 4474-4486, May.
    8. Rasmus Waagepetersen, 2006. "A Simulation‐based Goodness‐of‐fit Test for Random Effects in Generalized Linear Mixed Models," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 33(4), pages 721-731, December.
    9. Eric J. Tchetgen & Brent A. Coull, 2006. "A diagnostic test for the mixing distribution in a generalised linear mixed model," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 93(4), pages 1003-1010, December.
    10. Gerda Claeskens & Jeffrey Hart, 2009. "Rejoinder on: Goodness-of-fit tests in mixed models," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 18(2), pages 265-270, August.
    11. Alonso, Ariel & Litière, Saskia & Laenen, Annouschka, 2010. "A Note on the Indeterminacy of the Random-Effects Distribution in Hierarchical Models," The American Statistician, American Statistical Association, vol. 64(4), pages 318-324.
    12. Gerda Claeskens & Jeffrey Hart, 2009. "Goodness-of-fit tests in mixed models," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 18(2), pages 213-239, August.
    13. Agresti, Alan & Caffo, Brian & Ohman-Strickland, Pamela, 2004. "Examples in which misspecification of a random effects distribution reduces efficiency, and possible remedies," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 47(3), pages 639-653, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Francis K. C. Hui & Samuel Müller & Alan H. Welsh, 2021. "Random Effects Misspecification Can Have Severe Consequences for Random Effects Inference in Linear Mixed Models," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 89(1), pages 186-206, April.
    2. Baey, Charlotte & Cournède, Paul-Henry & Kuhn, Estelle, 2019. "Asymptotic distribution of likelihood ratio test statistics for variance components in nonlinear mixed effects models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 107-122.
    3. Freddy Hernández & Viviana Giampaoli, 2018. "The Impact of Misspecified Random Effect Distribution in a Weibull Regression Mixed Model," Stats, MDPI, vol. 1(1), pages 1-29, May.
    4. Shuwen Hu & You-Gan Wang & Christopher Drovandi & Taoyun Cao, 2023. "Predictions of machine learning with mixed-effects in analyzing longitudinal data under model misspecification," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 32(2), pages 681-711, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shun Yu & Xianzheng Huang, 2017. "Random-intercept misspecification in generalized linear mixed models for binary responses," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 26(3), pages 333-359, August.
    2. Francesco BARTOLUCCI & Silvia BACCI & Claudia PIGINI, 2015. "A Misspecification Test for Finite-Mixture Logistic Models for Clustered Binary and Ordered Responses," Working Papers 410, Universita' Politecnica delle Marche (I), Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e Sociali.
    3. Shun Yu & Xianzheng Huang, 2019. "Link misspecification in generalized linear mixed models with a random intercept for binary responses," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 28(3), pages 827-843, September.
    4. Leonardo Grilli & Carla Rampichini, 2015. "Specification of random effects in multilevel models: a review," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 49(3), pages 967-976, May.
    5. Lin, Kuo-Chin & Chen, Yi-Ju, 2015. "Detecting misspecification in the random-effects structure of cumulative logit models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 126-133.
    6. Huang, Xianzheng, 2011. "Detecting random-effects model misspecification via coarsened data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(1), pages 703-714, January.
    7. Tang, Min & Slud, Eric V. & Pfeiffer, Ruth M., 2014. "Goodness of fit tests for linear mixed models," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 176-193.
    8. Jakob Peterlin & Nataša Kejžar & Rok Blagus, 2023. "Correct specification of design matrices in linear mixed effects models: tests with graphical representation," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 32(1), pages 184-210, March.
    9. Bartolucci, Francesco & Bacci, Silvia & Pigini, Claudia, 2017. "Misspecification test for random effects in generalized linear finite-mixture models for clustered binary and ordered data," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 3(C), pages 112-131.
    10. Zhengxin Zhang & Xiaosheng Si & Changhua Hu & Xiangyu Kong, 2015. "Degradation modeling–based remaining useful life estimation: A review on approaches for systems with heterogeneity," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 229(4), pages 343-355, August.
    11. Tanya P. Garcia & Yanyuan Ma, 2016. "Optimal Estimator for Logistic Model with Distribution-free Random Intercept," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 43(1), pages 156-171, March.
    12. Freddy Hernández & Viviana Giampaoli, 2018. "The Impact of Misspecified Random Effect Distribution in a Weibull Regression Mixed Model," Stats, MDPI, vol. 1(1), pages 1-29, May.
    13. Gonzales Manteiga, Wenceslao & Maria Dolores, Martinez Miranda & Van Keilegom, Ingrid, 2012. "Goodness-of-fit Test in Parametric Mixed-Effects Models based on the Estimation of the Error Distribution," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2012022, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    14. Vock, David & Davidian, Marie & Tsiatis, Anastasios, 2014. "SNP_NLMM: A SAS Macro to Implement a Flexible Random Effects Density for Generalized Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Models," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 56(c02).
    15. Bao, Junshu & Hanson, Timothy E., 2016. "A mean-constrained finite mixture of normals model," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 93-99.
    16. Gwennaëlle Mabon, 2014. "Adaptive Estimation of Random-Effects Densities In Linear Mixed-Effects Model," Working Papers 2014-41, Center for Research in Economics and Statistics.
    17. Francis K. C. Hui & Samuel Müller & Alan H. Welsh, 2021. "Random Effects Misspecification Can Have Severe Consequences for Random Effects Inference in Linear Mixed Models," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 89(1), pages 186-206, April.
    18. Antonello Maruotti & Pierfrancesco Alaimo Di Loro, 2023. "CO2 emissions and growth: A bivariate bidimensional mean‐variance random effects model," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(5), August.
    19. Staudenmayer, John & Ruppert, David & Buonaccorsi, John P., 2008. "Density Estimation in the Presence of Heteroscedastic Measurement Error," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 103, pages 726-736, June.
    20. Caffo, Brian & An, Ming-Wen & Rohde, Charles, 2007. "Flexible random intercept models for binary outcomes using mixtures of normals," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(11), pages 5220-5235, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:73:y:2017:i:1:p:63-71. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0006-341X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.