Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

Impartial division of a dollar

Contents:

Author Info

  • de Clippel, Geoffroy
  • Moulin, Herve
  • Tideman, Nicolaus

Abstract

For impartial division, each participant reports only her opinion about the fair relative shares of the other participants, and this report has no effect on her own share. If a specific division is compatible with all reports, it is implemented. We propose a family of natural methods meeting these requirements, for a division among four or more participants. No such method exists for a division among three participants.

Download Info

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6WJ3-4PMT350-3/1/f9f4d0709c9324641f2bab0d6ad45c59
Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Bibliographic Info

Article provided by Elsevier in its journal Journal of Economic Theory.

Volume (Year): 139 (2008)
Issue (Month): 1 (March)
Pages: 176-191

as in new window
Handle: RePEc:eee:jetheo:v:139:y:2008:i:1:p:176-191

Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/622869

Related research

Keywords:

References

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as in new window

Cited by:
  1. Vicki Knoblauch, 2008. "Three-agent Peer Evaluation," Working papers 2008-28, University of Connecticut, Department of Economics.
  2. Gabrielle Demange, 2014. "A Ranking Method Based on Handicaps," CESifo Working Paper Series 4636, CESifo Group Munich.
  3. Gabrielle Demange, 2012. "On the influence of a ranking system," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer, vol. 39(2), pages 431-455, July.
  4. Shohei Tamura & Shinji Ohseto, 2014. "Impartial nomination correspondences," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer, vol. 43(1), pages 47-54, June.
  5. repec:hal:wpaper:halshs-00564982 is not listed on IDEAS
  6. Gabrielle Demange, 2011. "On the influence of rankings," PSE Working Papers halshs-00589657, HAL.
  7. Shinji Ohseto, 2012. "Exclusion of self evaluations in peer ratings: monotonicity versus unanimity on finitely restricted domains," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer, vol. 38(1), pages 109-119, January.
  8. Boudreau, James W. & Knoblauch, Vicki, 2011. "Dividing profits three ways: Exactness vs. consensuality," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 62(2), pages 79-86, September.
  9. repec:hal:wpaper:halshs-00589657 is not listed on IDEAS
  10. Anita Gantner & Rudolf Kerschbamer, 2013. "Fairness and Efficiency in a Subjective Claims Problem," Working Papers 2013-30, Faculty of Economics and Statistics, University of Innsbruck.
  11. James W. Boudreau & Vicki Knoblauch, 2010. "Dividing Profits Three Ways: Impartiality vs. Consensuality," Working papers 2010-15, University of Connecticut, Department of Economics.
  12. repec:hal:wpaper:halshs-00687180 is not listed on IDEAS

Lists

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jetheo:v:139:y:2008:i:1:p:176-191. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Zhang, Lei).

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.