IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v48y2000i3p193-205.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Empirical Assessment of Measurement Error in Health-Care Survey Research

Author

Listed:
  • Mishra, Debi Prasad

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Mishra, Debi Prasad, 2000. "An Empirical Assessment of Measurement Error in Health-Care Survey Research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 193-205, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:48:y:2000:i:3:p:193-205
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148-2963(98)00088-5
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cote, Joseph A & Buckley, M Ronald, 1988. "Measurement Error and Theory Testing in Consumer Research: An Illustration of the Importance of Construct Validation," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 14(4), pages 579-582, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gilles E. Gignac & Elizabeth Ooi, 2022. "Measurement error in research on financial literacy: How much error is there and how does it influence effect size estimates?," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(2), pages 938-956, June.
    2. Naresh K. Malhotra & Sung S. Kim & Ashutosh Patil, 2006. "Common Method Variance in IS Research: A Comparison of Alternative Approaches and a Reanalysis of Past Research," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(12), pages 1865-1883, December.
    3. Rajdeep Grewal & Joseph A. Cote & Hans Baumgartner, 2004. "Multicollinearity and Measurement Error in Structural Equation Models: Implications for Theory Testing," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(4), pages 519-529, June.
    4. MacKenzie, Scott B. & Podsakoff, Philip M., 2012. "Common Method Bias in Marketing: Causes, Mechanisms, and Procedural Remedies," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 88(4), pages 542-555.
    5. Smith, Anne M., 1999. "Some Problems When Adopting Churchill's Paradigm for the Development of Service Quality Measurement Scales," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 109-120, October.
    6. Allen, Chris T. & Machleit, Karen A. & Kleine, Susan Schultz & Notani, Arti Sahni, 2005. "A place for emotion in attitude models," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(4), pages 494-499, April.
    7. Wang, Stephen W. & Hsu, Maxwell K., 2016. "Airline co-branded credit cards—An application of the theory of planned behavior," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 245-254.
    8. Weathers, Danny & Sharma, Subhash & Niedrich, Ronald W., 2005. "The impact of the number of scale points, dispositional factors, and the status quo decision heuristic on scale reliability and response accuracy," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(11), pages 1516-1524, November.
    9. Kim, Hyeon Jeong & Lee, Choong C. & Yun, Haejung & Im, Kun Shin, 2015. "An examination of work exhaustion in the mobile enterprise environment," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 255-266.
    10. Low, Wen-Shinn & Lee, Jeng-Da & Cheng, Soo-May, 2013. "The link between customer satisfaction and price sensitivity: An investigation of retailing industry in Taiwan," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 1-10.
    11. Manit Mishra, 2016. "Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) as an Analytical Technique to Assess Measurement Error in Survey Research," Paradigm, , vol. 20(2), pages 97-112, December.
    12. Ping, Robert Jr., 2004. "On assuring valid measures for theoretical models using survey data," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(2), pages 125-141, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:48:y:2000:i:3:p:193-205. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.