IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v157y2023ics0148296322010165.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does after-hours work-related information and communication technology use promote work engagement? A preliminary daily Dairy study

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Linlin
  • Tekleab, Amanuel G.
  • Piszczek, Matthew
  • Qiu, Yang

Abstract

There has been growing research interest in after-hours work-related information and communication technology (WICT) use and its implications for employees and organizational effectiveness. Two themes have emerged as a result: while the first theme shows after-hours WICT use negatively affects employees’ well-being and performance, the second theme promotes the positive impact of such use on employees’ attitudes and performance. Using the job demands-resources model, the “too-much-of-a-thing” perspective and personal psychological resource depletion research, we integrate the two themes by investigating the curvilinear effect of after-hours WICT use on next day work engagement and the moderating effect of day of the week on this relationship. A daily-diary dataset from physicians over six days provides support for most of the predicted relationships. This study contributes theoretically by integrating the two themes and responding to calls for such studies and practically by providing recommendations on how to manage knowledge workers.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Linlin & Tekleab, Amanuel G. & Piszczek, Matthew & Qiu, Yang, 2023. "Does after-hours work-related information and communication technology use promote work engagement? A preliminary daily Dairy study," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:157:y:2023:i:c:s0148296322010165
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113551
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296322010165
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113551?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lanaj, Klodiana & Johnson, Russell E. & Barnes, Christopher M., 2014. "Beginning the workday yet already depleted? Consequences of late-night smartphone use and sleep," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 124(1), pages 11-23.
    2. Melissa Mazmanian & Wanda J. Orlikowski & JoAnne Yates, 2013. "The Autonomy Paradox: The Implications of Mobile Email Devices for Knowledge Professionals," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(5), pages 1337-1357, October.
    3. Fujimoto, Yuka & Ferdous, Ahmed Shahriar & Sekiguchi, Tomoki & Sugianto, Ly-Fie, 2016. "The effect of mobile technology usage on work engagement and emotional exhaustion in Japan," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(9), pages 3315-3323.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shanshan Zhang & Fengchun Huang & Yuting Zhang & Qiwen Li, 2023. "A Person-Environment Fit Model to Explain Information and Communication Technologies-Enabled After-Hours Work-Related Interruptions in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-16, February.
    2. Johanna Edvinsson & Svend Erik Mathiassen & Sofie Bjärntoft & Helena Jahncke & Terry Hartig & David M. Hallman, 2022. "A Work Time Control Tradeoff in Flexible Work: Competitive Pathways to Need for Recovery," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-15, December.
    3. Francis Cheung, 2022. "Work-Related Smartphone Use at Night and Job Satisfaction: Testing a Moderated Mediation Model of Emotional Exhaustion and Organizational Dehumanization," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-14, August.
    4. Gajendran, Ravi S. & Loewenstein, Jeffrey & Choi, Hyeran & Ozgen, Sibel, 2022. "Hidden costs of text-based electronic communication on complex reasoning tasks: Motivation maintenance and impaired downstream performance," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    5. Haixia Wang & Pei Liu & Xiaoying Zhao & Aimei Li & Chenjie Xiao, 2022. "Work-Related Use of Information and Communication Technologies After Hours (W_ICTs) and Work-Family Conflict: A Moderated Mediation Model," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(3), pages 21582440221, August.
    6. Xia Jiang & Jing Du & Tianfei Yang & Jinfan Zhou, 2021. "Sustainable Interpersonal Interaction: Research on Instant Message and Helping from the Perspective of Sender," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, January.
    7. van Zoonen, Ward & Verhoeven, Joost W.M. & Vliegenthart, Rens, 2017. "Understanding the consequences of public social media use for work," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 595-605.
    8. María Candela Rodríguez & Guillermo Enrique Dabos, 2016. "Gestión individual del equilibrio entre el trabajo y la vida personal: revisión e integración de la literatura," Revista Facultad de Ciencias Económicas, Universidad Militar Nueva Granada, vol. 25(1), pages 219-242, December.
    9. Viktoria Maria Baumeister & Leonie Petra Kuen & Maike Bruckes & Gerhard Schewe, 2021. "The Relationship of Work-Related ICT Use With Well-being, Incorporating the Role of Resources and Demands: A Meta-Analysis," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, November.
    10. Angela Garcia Calvo & Martin Kenney & John Zysman, 2023. "Understanding work in the online platform economy: the narrow, the broad, and the systemic perspectives," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 32(4), pages 795-814.
    11. Dust, Scott B. & Liu, Haiyang & Wang, Siting & Reina, Christopher, 2022. "The effect of mindfulness and job demands on motivation and performance trajectories across the workweek: an entrainment theory perspective," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 108445, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    12. Yi Sun & Shihui Li & Lingling Yu, 2022. "The dark sides of AI personal assistant: effects of service failure on user continuance intention," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(1), pages 17-39, March.
    13. Nurmi, Niina & Koroma, Johanna, 2020. "The emotional benefits and performance costs of building a psychologically safe language climate in MNCs," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 55(4).
    14. Armanda Cetrulo & Dario Guarascio & Maria Enrica Virgillito, 2020. "Anatomy of the Italian occupational structure: concentrated power and distributed knowledge," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 29(6), pages 1345-1379.
    15. Nada Endrissat & Aurélie Leclercq Vandelannoitte, 2021. "From sites to vibes: Technology and the spatial production of coworking spaces," Post-Print hal-03332209, HAL.
    16. Ruthanne Huising, 2014. "The Erosion of Expert Control Through Censure Episodes," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(6), pages 1633-1661, December.
    17. Christian P Theurer & Andranik Tumasjan & Isabell M Welpe, 2018. "Contextual work design and employee innovative work behavior: When does autonomy matter?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-35, October.
    18. Prithwiraj Choudhury & Kevin Crowston & Linus Dahlander & Marco S. Minervini & Sumita Raghuram, 2020. "GitLab: work where you want, when you want," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 9(1), pages 1-17, December.
    19. Andrea Salvatori & Seetha Menon & Wouter Zwysen, 2018. "The effect of computer use on job quality: Evidence from Europe," OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers 200, OECD Publishing.
    20. Singh, Usha & Ghadiri, Argang & Weimar, Daniel & Prinz, Joachim, 2020. "“Let’s have a break”: An experimental comparison of work-break interventions and their impact on performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 128-135.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:157:y:2023:i:c:s0148296322010165. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.