IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v134y2021icp59-69.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A double-edged sword: How the dual characteristics of face motivate and prevent counterfeit luxury consumption

Author

Listed:
  • Shan, Juan
  • Jiang, Ling
  • Cui, Annie Peng

Abstract

This research fills the void in the counterfeit literature by examining the role of the dual facets of face in deterring consumers from purchasing counterfeit luxury brands. It advances understanding of counterfeiting by clarifying how consumers’ internal struggles with the desire to gain mian-zi versus the fear of losing lian predict their reactions to external branding cues, such as brand social power. Study 1, a survey research, examines the moderating role of face on the relationship between brand social power and purchase intentions, while Study 2, an experimental study, explores how the above-mentioned relationships are mediated by signaling effectiveness and consumers’ perceived psychosocial risk associated with counterfeit purchases. This research contributes to marketing theory by shedding light on the dynamics among the intriguing dual facets of face. The findings help uncover means to fight counterfeiting by reducing demand, which should prove more efficient than attempting to cut the supply.

Suggested Citation

  • Shan, Juan & Jiang, Ling & Cui, Annie Peng, 2021. "A double-edged sword: How the dual characteristics of face motivate and prevent counterfeit luxury consumption," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 59-69.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:134:y:2021:i:c:p:59-69
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.05.032
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296321003611
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.05.032?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joo Yup Kim & Sang Hoon Nam, 1998. "The Concept and Dynamics of Face: Implications for Organizational Behavior in Asia," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 9(4), pages 522-534, August.
    2. Bian, Xuemei & Moutinho, Luiz, 2009. "An investigation of determinants of counterfeit purchase consideration," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(3), pages 368-378, March.
    3. Mandel, Naomi, 2003. "Shifting Selves and Decision Making: The Effects of Self-Construal Priming on Consumer Risk-Taking," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 30(1), pages 30-40, June.
    4. Daniel Kahneman & Amos Tversky, 2013. "Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Leonard C MacLean & William T Ziemba (ed.), HANDBOOK OF THE FUNDAMENTALS OF FINANCIAL DECISION MAKING Part I, chapter 6, pages 99-127, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    5. Grossman, Gene M & Shapiro, Carl, 1988. "Counterfeit-Product Trade," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 78(1), pages 59-75, March.
    6. Wang, Li & Jin, Manhui & Yang, Zhiyong, 2020. "Regulatory focus and consumption of counterfeit luxury goods: Roles of functional theories of attitudes and perceived similarity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 50-61.
    7. Campbell, Margaret C & Goodstein, Ronald C, 2001. "The Moderating Effect of Perceived Risk on Consumers' Evaluations of Product Incongruity: Preference for the Norm," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 28(3), pages 439-449, December.
    8. Randhawa, Praneet & Calantone, Roger J. & Voorhees, Clay M., 2015. "The pursuit of counterfeited luxury: An examination of the negative side effects of close consumer–brand connections," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(11), pages 2395-2403.
    9. Thorstein Veblen, 1899. "Mr. Cummings's Strictures on "The Theory of the Leisure Class"," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 8, pages 106-106.
    10. Pueschel, Julia & Chamaret, Cécile & Parguel, Béatrice, 2017. "Coping with copies: The influence of risk perceptions in luxury counterfeit consumption in GCC countries," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 184-194.
    11. Belk, Russell W, 1988. "Possessions and the Extended Self," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 15(2), pages 139-168, September.
    12. Ling Jiang & Veronique Cova, 2012. "Love for Luxury, Preference for Counterfeits –A Qualitative Study in Counterfeit Luxury Consumption in China," Post-Print hal-02062369, HAL.
    13. Marticotte, François & Arcand, Manon, 2017. "Schadenfreude, attitude and the purchase intentions of a counterfeit luxury brand," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 175-183.
    14. Kaufmann, Hans Ruediger & Petrovici, Dan Alex & Filho, Cid Gonçalves & Ayres, Adriano, 2016. "Identifying moderators of brand attachment for driving customer purchase intention of original vs counterfeits of luxury brands," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(12), pages 5735-5747.
    15. Veblen, Thorstein, 1899. "The Theory of the Leisure Class," History of Economic Thought Books, McMaster University Archive for the History of Economic Thought, number veblen1899.
    16. Gene M. Grossman & Carl Shapiro, 1988. "Foreign Counterfeiting of Status Goods," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 103(1), pages 79-100.
    17. Huachao Gao & Karen Page Winterich & Yinlong Zhang, 2016. "All That Glitters Is Not Gold: How Others’ Status Influences the Effect of Power Distance Belief on Status Consumption," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 43(2), pages 265-281.
    18. Bian, Xuemei & Wang, Kai-Yu & Smith, Andrew & Yannopoulou, Natalia, 2016. "New insights into unethical counterfeit consumption," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(10), pages 4249-4258.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ryu, Gangseog & Kim, Boha & Park, Kikyoung, 2023. "Anti-counterfeiting advertisements for luxury brands in the post pandemic era: Roles of message type, visual presentation mode, and self-construal," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    2. Katyal, Kanupriya & Dawra, Jagrook & Soni, Nitin, 2022. "The posh, the paradoxical and the phony: Are there individual differences between consumers of luxury, masstige and counterfeit brands?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 191-204.
    3. Ahmad Hamdani & Idris Gautama So & Amalia E. Maulana & Asnan Furinto, 2023. "How Can Conspicuous Omni-Signaling Fulfil Social Needs and Induce Re-Consumption?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-21, June.
    4. Chaudhry, Peggy E., 2022. "Dupe influencers exploiting social media to peddle luxury fakes," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 65(6), pages 719-727.
    5. He, Yue & Mo, Zan & Wan, Xiuqi & Li, Mengyin & Fu, Huijian, 2023. "Who will embrace upward line extension? The role of power distance belief," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    6. Hu, Xianfeng & Wang, Shanyong & Zhou, Rongting & Gao, Lan & Zhu, Zujun, 2023. "Policy driven or consumer trait driven? Unpacking the EVs purchase intention of consumers from the policy and consumer trait perspective," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sharma, Amalesh & Soni, Mauli & Borah, Sourav Bikash & Haque, Tanjum, 2022. "From silos to synergies: A systematic review of luxury in marketing research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 893-907.
    2. Jiahan Li & Mahsa Ghaffari & Lin Su, 2020. "Counterfeit luxury consumption strategies in a collectivistic culture: the case of China," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(5), pages 546-560, September.
    3. Yang-Im Lee & Peter R. J. Trim, 2019. "Refining brand strategy: insights into how the “informed poseur” legitimizes purchasing counterfeits," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 26(5), pages 595-613, September.
    4. Bachmann, Frank & Walsh, Gianfranco & Hammes, Eva K., 2019. "Consumer perceptions of luxury brands: An owner-based perspective," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 287-298.
    5. Song, Lei & Meng, Yan & Chang, Hua & Li, Wenjing & Tan (Frank), Kang, 2021. "How counterfeit dominance affects luxury fashion brand owners’ perceptions: A cross-cultural examination," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 1-13.
    6. Chaudhry, Peggy E., 2022. "Dupe influencers exploiting social media to peddle luxury fakes," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 65(6), pages 719-727.
    7. Bian, Xuemei & Moutinho, Luiz, 2009. "An investigation of determinants of counterfeit purchase consideration," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(3), pages 368-378, March.
    8. Loussaïef, Leïla & Ulrich, Isabelle & Damay, Coralie, 2019. "How does access to luxury fashion challenge self-identity? Exploring women's practices of joint and non-ownership," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 263-272.
    9. Oliver Hinz & Martin Spann & Il-Horn Hann, 2015. "Research Note—Can’t Buy Me Love…Or Can I? Social Capital Attainment Through Conspicuous Consumption in Virtual Environments," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 26(4), pages 859-870, December.
    10. Orth, Ulrich R. & Hoffmann, Stefan & Nickel, Kristina, 2019. "Moral decoupling feels good and makes buying counterfeits easy," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 117-125.
    11. Pillai, Kishore Gopalakrishna & Nair, Smitha R., 2021. "The effect of social comparison orientation on luxury purchase intentions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 89-100.
    12. Xuemei Bian & Sadia Haque, 2020. "Counterfeit versus original patronage: Do emotional brand attachment, brand involvement, and past experience matter?," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(4), pages 438-451, July.
    13. Antonia Correia & Metin Kozak & Seongseop (Sam) Kim, 2018. "Luxury shopping orientations of mainland Chinese tourists in Hong Kong," Tourism Economics, , vol. 24(1), pages 92-108, February.
    14. Komal Nagar & Vishab Pratap Singh, 2021. "Modelling the Effects of Materialism, Ethics and Variety-Seeking Behaviour on Counterfeit Consumption of Young Consumers," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 22(4), pages 996-1009, August.
    15. Pueschel, Julia & Chamaret, Cécile & Parguel, Béatrice, 2017. "Coping with copies: The influence of risk perceptions in luxury counterfeit consumption in GCC countries," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 184-194.
    16. Wang, Li & Jin, Manhui & Yang, Zhiyong, 2020. "Regulatory focus and consumption of counterfeit luxury goods: Roles of functional theories of attitudes and perceived similarity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 50-61.
    17. Islam, Tahir & Pitafi, Abdul Hameed & Akhtar, Naeem & Xiaobei, Liang, 2021. "Determinants of purchase luxury counterfeit products in social commerce: The mediating role of compulsive internet use," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    18. Pak, Tae-Young, 2023. "Relative deprivation and financial risk taking✰," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 55(PA).
    19. Ostovan, Nima & Khalili Nasr, Arash, 2022. "The manifestation of luxury value dimensions in brand engagement in self-concept," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    20. Schmidt, Ulrich & Neyse, Levent & Aleknonyte, Milda, 2019. "Income inequality and risk taking: the impact of social comparison information," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 87(3), pages 283-297.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:134:y:2021:i:c:p:59-69. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.