IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v131y2021icp55-68.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Frontline employees’ compliance with fuzzy requests: A request–appraisal–behavior perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Xiaodong
  • Wang, Chuang
  • Hamari, Juho

Abstract

While fuzzy requests from customers are pervasive in service encounters, it is lacking understanding of how to manage these kind of requests. By combining health belief model and theory of planned behavior, this study proposes a request–appraisal–behavior paradigm to elucidate frontline employees’ compliance with fuzzy requests. The research model is empirically examined with data collected from 256 frontline restaurant employees. The results show that compliance behavior is negatively influenced by conflict susceptibility, request severity, and punishment expectation, but positively influenced by satisfaction reward expectation, customer orientation norms, and job autonomy. The moderating effects of customer orientation norms and job autonomy on the relationships among satisfaction reward expectation (punishment expectation) and compliance behavior are also demonstrated. This study is among the first theoretical explorations of compliance behavior toward customer’ fuzzy requests. It also offers effective strategies for service providers and frontline employees to manage and cope with fuzzy requests.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Xiaodong & Wang, Chuang & Hamari, Juho, 2021. "Frontline employees’ compliance with fuzzy requests: A request–appraisal–behavior perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 55-68.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:131:y:2021:i:c:p:55-68
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.03.052
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296321002150
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.03.052?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ajzen, Icek, 1991. "The theory of planned behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 179-211, December.
    2. Schepers, Jeroen J.L. & Nijssen, Edwin J. & van der Heijden, Gielis A.H., 2016. "Innovation in the frontline: Exploring the relationship between role conflict, ideas for improvement, and employee service performance," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 797-817.
    3. Naresh K. Malhotra & Sung S. Kim & Ashutosh Patil, 2006. "Common Method Variance in IS Research: A Comparison of Alternative Approaches and a Reanalysis of Past Research," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(12), pages 1865-1883, December.
    4. Nathan Eva & Daniel Prajogo & Brian Cooper, 2017. "The relationship between personal values, organizational formalization and employee work outcomes of compliance and innovation," International Journal of Manpower, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 38(2), pages 274-287, May.
    5. Collier, Joel E. & Barnes, Donald C. & Abney, Alexandra K. & Pelletier, Mark J., 2018. "Idiosyncratic service experiences: When customers desire the extraordinary in a service encounter," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 150-161.
    6. Teng Teng & Shengliang Zhang & Xiaodong Li & Yuan Chen, 2020. "Customer compliance with employee fuzzy requests in service encounters: a self-determination theory perspective," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 14(2), pages 217-240, June.
    7. Reynolds, Kate L. & Harris, Lloyd C., 2009. "Dysfunctional Customer Behavior Severity: An Empirical Examination," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 85(3), pages 321-335.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nan Zhu & Yuxin Liu & Jianwei Zhang & Na Wang, 2023. "Contingent reward versus punishment and compliance behavior: the mediating role of affective attitude and the moderating role of operational capabilities of artificial intelligence," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-11, December.
    2. Li, Xiaodong & Liu, Zibing & Ren, Ai & Gong, Bengang, 2022. "What fuzzy requests bring to frontline employees: An absorptive capacity theory perspective," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    3. Lee, Ruby P. & Wei, Susan, 2023. "Do employee orientation and societal orientation matter in the customer orientation—Performance link?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mäntymäki, Matti & Salo, Jari, 2013. "Purchasing behavior in social virtual worlds: An examination of Habbo Hotel," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 282-290.
    2. Hsu, Dan K. & Burmeister-Lamp, Katrin & Simmons, Sharon A. & Foo, Maw-Der & Hong, Michelle C. & Pipes, Jesse D., 2019. "“I know I can, but I don't fit”: Perceived fit, self-efficacy, and entrepreneurial intention," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 311-326.
    3. Lin Jia & Xiuwei Song & Dianne Hall, 2022. "Influence of Habits on Mobile Payment Acceptance: An Ecosystem Perspective," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 247-266, February.
    4. Daunt, Kate L. & Harris, Lloyd C., 2011. "Customers acting badly: Evidence from the hospitality industry," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(10), pages 1034-1042, October.
    5. Morteza Ghobakhloo & Masood Fathi, 2019. "Modeling the Success of Application-Based Mobile Banking," Economies, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-21, November.
    6. Nguyen, The Ninh & Lobo, Antonio & Greenland, Steven, 2016. "Pro-environmental purchase behaviour: The role of consumers' biospheric values," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 98-108.
    7. Wan, Calvin & Shen, Geoffrey Qiping & Yu, Ann, 2014. "The role of perceived effectiveness of policy measures in predicting recycling behaviour in Hong Kong," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 141-151.
    8. Shankar, Amit & Rishi, Bikramjit, 2020. "Convenience matter in mobile banking adoption intention?," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 273-285.
    9. Odou, Philippe & Schill, Marie, 2020. "How anticipated emotions shape behavioral intentions to fight climate change," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 243-253.
    10. Dionysis Skarmeas & Constantinos N. Leonidou & Charalampos Saridakis & Giuseppe Musarra, 2020. "Pathways to Civic Engagement with Big Social Issues: An Integrated Approach," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 164(2), pages 261-285, June.
    11. Newton, Joshua D. & Tsarenko, Yelena & Ferraro, Carla & Sands, Sean, 2015. "Environmental concern and environmental purchase intentions: The mediating role of learning strategy," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(9), pages 1974-1981.
    12. Bacile, Todd J. & Ye, Christine & Swilley, Esther, 2014. "From Firm-Controlled to Consumer-Contributed: Consumer Co-Production of Personal Media Marketing Communication," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 117-133.
    13. Akhter Shareef, Mahmud & Shakaib Akram, Muhammad & Tegwen Malik, F. & Kumar, Vinod & Dwivedi, Yogesh K. & Giannakis, Mihalis, 2023. "An attitude-behavioral model to understand people’s behavior towards tourism during COVID-19 pandemic," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    14. Jingnan Zhang & Shichun Xu & Zhengxia He & Chengze Li & Xiaona Meng, 2022. "Factors Influencing Adoption Intention for Electric Vehicles under a Subsidy Deduction: From Different City-Level Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-24, May.
    15. Seger-Guttmann, Tali, 2019. "Customers' irrational beliefs: Scale development and validation," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 54-66.
    16. Shuk Ying Ho & Arun Rai, 2017. "Continued Voluntary Participation Intention in Firm-Participating Open Source Software Projects," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 28(3), pages 603-625, September.
    17. Tsarenko, Yelena & Ferraro, Carla & Sands, Sean & McLeod, Colin, 2013. "Environmentally conscious consumption: The role of retailers and peers as external influences," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 302-310.
    18. Suzy Jagger & Haytham Siala & Diane Sloan, 2016. "It's All in the Game: A 3D Learning Model for Business Ethics," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 137(2), pages 383-403, August.
    19. Hao-Fan Chumg & Jia-Wen Shi & Kai-Jun Sun, 2019. "Why Employees Contribute to Pro-Environmental Behaviour: The Role of Pluralistic Ignorance in Chinese Society," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-22, December.
    20. Tuan Duong Vu & Hoang Viet Nguyen & Phuong Thao Vu & Thi Hoang Ha Tran & Van Hung Vu, 2023. "Gen Z Customers’ Continuance Intention in Using Food Delivery Application in an Emerging Market: Empirical Evidence from Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-16, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:131:y:2021:i:c:p:55-68. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.