IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v121y2020icp524-534.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Beyond organisational support: Exploring the supportive role of co-workers and supervisors in a multi-actor service ecosystem

Author

Listed:
  • Pinna, Roberta
  • De Simone, Silvia
  • Cicotto, Gianfranco
  • Malik, Ashish

Abstract

Customer engagement in a value co-creation processes is an attractive proposition for firms as it closely mirrors consumer needs, encourages their participation in service consumption, improves their perception and reduces uncertainty and risk. This approach emphasizes the centrality of interaction among different actors within an ecosystem. Despite the critical role frontline employees play in customer engagement and relationship processes in a multi-actor system, there is a limited understanding of the role of co-workers and supervisors’ support in addition to organisational support for achieving high levels of employee and consequently customer engagement as well as reducing sales employees’ intention to quit. Using structural equation modelling and analyzing 481 employees’ data from an Italian retail chain, this paper analyses the impact of organisational and social support on employees’ job satisfaction, work engagement and intention to quit. Implications for theory and practice in value co-creation process in a multi-actor system are also discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Pinna, Roberta & De Simone, Silvia & Cicotto, Gianfranco & Malik, Ashish, 2020. "Beyond organisational support: Exploring the supportive role of co-workers and supervisors in a multi-actor service ecosystem," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 524-534.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:121:y:2020:i:c:p:524-534
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.02.022
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296320301193
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.02.022?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vargo, Stephen L. & Lusch, Robert F., 2017. "Service-dominant logic 2025," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 46-67.
    2. J.J. Brakus & B.H. Schmitt & L. Zarantonello, 2009. "Brand Experience: What Is It? How Do We Measure It? And Does It Affect Loyalty?," Post-Print hal-00799102, HAL.
    3. Wilmar Schaufeli & Marisa Salanova & Vicente González-romá & Arnold Bakker, 2002. "The Measurement of Engagement and Burnout: A Two Sample Confirmatory Factor Analytic Approach," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 71-92, March.
    4. Riggle, Robert J. & Edmondson, Diane R. & Hansen, John D., 2009. "A meta-analysis of the relationship between perceived organizational support and job outcomes: 20 years of research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(10), pages 1027-1030, October.
    5. Stephen L. Vargo & Robert F. Lusch, 2016. "Institutions and axioms: an extension and update of service-dominant logic," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 44(1), pages 5-23, January.
    6. Luke Treglown & Katarina Zivkov & Anthony Zarola & Adrian Furnham, 2018. "Intention to quit and the role of dark personality and perceived organizational support: A moderation and mediation model," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(3), pages 1-13, March.
    7. Zeynep Ton & Robert S. Huckman, 2008. "Managing the Impact of Employee Turnover on Performance: The Role of Process Conformance," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 19(1), pages 56-68, February.
    8. Ledyard Tucker & Charles Lewis, 1973. "A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 38(1), pages 1-10, March.
    9. Siti Nur Hidayah Ibrahim & Choo Ling Suan & Osman M. Karatepe, 2019. "The effects of supervisor support and self-efficacy on call center employees’ work engagement and quitting intentions," International Journal of Manpower, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 40(4), pages 688-703, February.
    10. Jones, Eli & Chonko, Lawrence & Rangarajan, Deva & Roberts, James, 2007. "The role of overload on job attitudes, turnover intentions, and salesperson performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 60(7), pages 663-671, July.
    11. Nicolai J. Foss & Keld Laursen & Torben Pedersen, 2011. "Linking Customer Interaction and Innovation: The Mediating Role of New Organizational Practices," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(4), pages 980-999, August.
    12. Vargo, Stephen L. & Maglio, Paul P. & Akaka, Melissa Archpru, 2008. "On value and value co-creation: A service systems and service logic perspective," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 145-152, June.
    13. Hirotugu Akaike, 1987. "Factor analysis and AIC," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 52(3), pages 317-332, September.
    14. Matthew Alexander & Elina Jaakkola & Linda Hollebeek, 2018. "Zooming out: actor engagement beyond the dyadic," Post-Print hal-02008939, HAL.
    15. Johnston, Mark W. & Futrell, Charles M., 1989. "Functional salesforce turnover: An empirical investigation into the positive effects of turnover," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 141-157, March.
    16. Boles, James S. & Johnson, Julie T. & BarksdaleJr., Hiram C., 2000. "How Salespeople Build Quality Relationships:: A Replication and Extension," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 75-81, April.
    17. Yi, Youjae & Gong, Taeshik, 2013. "Customer value co-creation behavior: Scale development and validation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(9), pages 1279-1284.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marina Mondo & Gianfranco Cicotto & Jessica Pileri & Ester Cois & Silvia De Simone, 2023. "Promote Well-Being and Innovation in Sustainable Organizations: The Role of Job Crafting as Mediator," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-21, May.
    2. Silvia De Simone & Gianfranco Cicotto & Roberto Cenciotti & Laura Borgogni, 2021. "Perceptions of Social Context and Intention to Quit: The Mediating Role of Work Engagement and Interpersonal Strain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-14, July.
    3. Marina Mondo & Jessica Pileri & Federica Carta & Silvia De Simone, 2022. "Social Support and Self-Efficacy on Turnover Intentions: The Mediating Role of Conflict and Commitment," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-17, September.
    4. Qi, Ji (Miracle) & Wang, Sijun & Lindsey Hall, Kristina K., 2023. "Bridging employee engagement and customer engagement in a service context," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    5. Hjordis Sigursteinsdottir & Fjola Bjork Karlsdottir, 2022. "Does Social Support Matter in the Workplace? Social Support, Job Satisfaction, Bullying and Harassment in the Workplace during COVID-19," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-14, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Linda D. Hollebeek & Rajendra K. Srivastava & Tom Chen, 2019. "S-D logic–informed customer engagement: integrative framework, revised fundamental propositions, and application to CRM," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 161-185, January.
    2. Katsifaraki, Georgia D. & Theodosiou, Marios, 2020. "How different (dis)engagement behaviors affect performance within an e-market ecosystem: A longitudinal analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 578-591.
    3. Mahavarpour, Nasrin & Marvi, Reza & Foroudi, Pantea, 2023. "A Brief History of Service Innovation: The evolution of past, present, and future of service innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    4. Suvi Nenonen & Kaj Storbacka & Charlotta Windahl, 2019. "Capabilities for market-shaping: triggering and facilitating increased value creation," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 617-639, July.
    5. Hsin-Hui Chou & Chao-Chin Huang & Pei-Yun Tu, 2023. "Towards becoming a service-dominant enterprise: an actor engagement perspective," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 17(2), pages 607-632, June.
    6. Kazem Haki & Michael Blaschke & Stephan Aier & Robert Winter, 2019. "A Value Co-creation Perspective on Information Systems Analysis and Design," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 61(4), pages 487-502, August.
    7. Schulz, Thomas & Zimmermann, Sina & Böhm, Markus & Gewald, Heiko & Krcmar, Helmut, 2021. "Value co-creation and co-destruction in service ecosystems: The case of the Reach Now app," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    8. Francesco Polese & Debora Sarno & Orlando Troisi & Mara Grimaldi, 2018. "From B2B to A4A: An Integrated Framework for Viable Value Co-Creation," MERCATI & COMPETITIVIT?, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(3), pages 135-161.
    9. Ho, Mia Hsiao-Wen & Chung, Henry F.L. & Kingshott, Russel & Chiu, Chun-Chen, 2020. "Customer engagement, consumption and firm performance in a multi-actor service eco-system: The moderating role of resource integration," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 557-566.
    10. Mele, Cristina & Russo Spena, Tiziana & Kaartemo, Valtteri & Marzullo, Maria Luisa, 2021. "Smart nudging: How cognitive technologies enable choice architectures for value co-creation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 949-960.
    11. Miguel Ángel Moliner‐Tena & Diego Monferrer‐Tirado & Marta Estrada‐Guillén & Lidia Vidal‐Meliá, 2023. "Sustainable service ecosystems from the transformative value perspective: A study in tourism destinations," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(1), pages 342-357, January.
    12. Jörg Finsterwalder & Alastair G. Tombs, 2021. "Infusing tribal reciprocity into service research: towards an integrated and dynamic view of repayment, retaliation and restorative justice for regenerative service ecosystem wellbeing," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 15(4), pages 563-586, December.
    13. Simon Michalke & Lisa Lohrenz & Christoph Lattemann & Susanne Robra-Bissantz, 2022. "Exploring engagement, well-being, and welfare on engagement platforms: Insight into the personal service sector from the DACH region," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(4), pages 2429-2444, December.
    14. Hörger, Christian & Ward, Philippa, 2023. "Coordination mechanisms and the role of taskscape in value co-creation: The British ‘milkman’," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    15. Cindy Yunhsin Chou & Chin Hsiu Huang & Tzu-An Lin, 2018. "Organizational intellectual capital and its relation to frontline service employee innovative behavior: consumer value co-creation behavior as a moderator," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 12(4), pages 663-684, December.
    16. Orlando Troisi & Carlo Alessandro Sirianni & Antonella Monda & Mara Grimaldi, 2017. "ICTS and engagement platforms in resource integration: threat or opportunity for value co-creation?," ESPERIENZE D'IMPRESA, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2017(1), pages 99-123.
    17. Viglia, Giampaolo & Pera, Rebecca & Dyussembayeva, Shynar & Mifsud, Matthieu & Hollebeek, Linda D., 2023. "Engagement and value cocreation within a multi-stakeholder service ecosystem," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    18. Roberto Grandinetti & Marco Bettiol & Eleonora Di Maria, 2022. "Contexts of Consumption and Their Evolution in the Digital Age: Beyond the Service-Dominant Logic," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-17, September.
    19. Zha, Dongmei & Marvi, Reza & Foroudi, Pantea, 2023. "Synthesizing the customer experience concept: A multimodularity approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    20. Torres Pena, Maria Veronica & Breidbach, Christoph F., 2021. "On emergence in service platforms: An application to P2P lending," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 337-347.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:121:y:2020:i:c:p:524-534. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.