IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ijrema/v32y2015i1p94-112.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improving the statistical performance of tracking studies based on repeated cross-sections with primary dynamic factor analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Du, Rex Yuxing
  • Kamakura, Wagner A.

Abstract

Tracking studies are prevalent in marketing research and virtually all the other social sciences. These studies are predominantly implemented via repeated independent, non-overlapping samples, which are much less costly than recruiting and maintaining a longitudinal panel that track the same sample over time. In the existing literature, data from repeated cross-sectional samples are analyzed either independently for each time period, or longitudinally by focusing on the dynamics of the aggregate measures (e.g., sample averages). In this study, we propose a multivariate state-space model that can be applied directly to the individual-level data from each of the independent samples, simultaneously taking advantage of three patterns embedded in the data: a) inter-temporal dependence within the population means of each variable, b) temporal co-movements across the population means of different variables and c) cross-sectional co-variation across individual responses within each sample. We illustrate our proposed model with two applications, demonstrating the benefits of making full use of all the available data. In the first illustration, we have access to all the individual-level purchase data from one large population of grocery shoppers over a span of 36months. This provides us a testing ground for benchmarking our proposed model against existing approaches in a Monte Carlo experiment, where we show that our model outperforms all the alternatives in inferring population dynamics using data sampled through repeated cross-sections. We find that, as compared with using simple sample averages, our proposed model can improve the accuracy of repeated cross-sectional tracking studies by double digits, without incurring any additional data-gathering costs (or equivalently, reducing the data-gathering costs by double digits while maintaining the desired accuracy level). In the second illustration, we apply the proposed model to repeated cross-sectional surveys that track customer perceptions and satisfaction for an automotive dealer, a situation often encountered by marketing researchers.

Suggested Citation

  • Du, Rex Yuxing & Kamakura, Wagner A., 2015. "Improving the statistical performance of tracking studies based on repeated cross-sections with primary dynamic factor analysis," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 94-112.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ijrema:v:32:y:2015:i:1:p:94-112
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2014.10.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167811614000822
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2014.10.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cheng Hsiao, 2007. "Panel data analysis—advantages and challenges," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 16(1), pages 1-22, May.
    2. Moshe Feder, 2001. "Time Series Analysis of Repeated Surveys: The State–space Approach," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 55(2), pages 182-199, July.
    3. Koen Pauwels & Dominique M. Hanssens, 2007. "Performance Regimes and Marketing Policy Shifts," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(3), pages 293-311, 05-06.
    4. Jo Thori Lind, 2005. "Repeated surveys and the Kalman filter," Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 8(3), pages 418-427, December.
    5. Tanizaki, Hisashi, 1993. "Kalman Filter Model with Qualitative Dependent Variables," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 75(4), pages 747-752, November.
    6. Andrew Harvey & Chia‐Hui Chung, 2000. "Estimating the underlying change in unemployment in the UK," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 163(3), pages 303-309.
    7. Marc Vanhuele & Shuba Srinivasan & Koen Pauwels, 2010. "Mindset Metrics in Market Response Models: An Integrative Approach," Post-Print hal-00528411, HAL.
    8. Cheng Hsiao, 2007. "Rejoinder on: Panel data analysis—advantages and challenges," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 16(1), pages 56-57, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Krieg, Sabine & van den Brakel, Jan A., 2012. "Estimation of the monthly unemployment rate for six domains through structural time series modelling with cointegrated trends," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(10), pages 2918-2933.
    2. Hany Eldemerdash & Hugh Metcalf & Sara Maioli, 2014. "Twin deficits: new evidence from a developing (oil vs. non-oil) countries’ perspective," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 47(3), pages 825-851, November.
    3. Ding Luo & Oded Cats & Hans Lint, 2020. "Can passenger flow distribution be estimated solely based on network properties in public transport systems?," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(6), pages 2757-2776, December.
    4. Li, Larry & McMurray, Adela & Sy, Malick & Xue, Jinjun, 2018. "Corporate ownership, efficiency and performance under state capitalism: Evidence from China," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 40(4), pages 747-766.
    5. Almudena Moreno-Mínguez & Marta Ortega-Gaspar & Carlos Gamero-Burón, 2018. "A Socio-Structural Perspective on Family Model Preferences, Gender Roles and Work–Family Attitudes in Spain," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-23, December.
    6. Susanne Fricke & Lodovico Muratori, 2017. "Spatial price transmission and trade policies: new evidence for agricultural products from selected sub-Saharan African countries with high frequency data," Working Papers 5/17, Sapienza University of Rome, DISS.
    7. Lynn, Peter & Bosch, Oriol, 2021. "Methodological lessons from the pilot longitudinal survey on debt advice," ISER Working Paper Series 2021-03, Institute for Social and Economic Research.
    8. Mehmet H. TOPAL & Özlem S. GÜL, 2016. "The Effect of Country Risk on Foreign Direct Investment: A Dynamic Panel Data Analysis for Developing Countries," Journal of Economics Library, KSP Journals, vol. 3(1), pages 141-155, March.
    9. Yasser Razak Hussain & Pranab Mukhopadhyay, 2023. "How Much do Education, Experience, and Social Networks Impact Earnings in India? A Panel Data Analysis Disaggregated by Class, Gender, Caste and Religion," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.
    10. Wambua, Dennis Kyalo, 2017. "Influence Of Social Capital And Networks On Marketing Performance Of Smallholder Grain Farmer Groups In Tharaka North And Tharaka South Sub-Counties, Kenya," Research Theses 276430, Collaborative Masters Program in Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    11. Alice Hengevoss, 2021. "Assessing the Impact of Nonprofit Organizations on Multi-Actor Global Governance Initiatives: The Case of the UN Global Compact," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-13, June.
    12. Trabelsi, Emna & Hichri, Walid, 2021. "Central Bank Transparency with (semi-)public Information: Laboratory Experiments," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    13. Costin Andrei ISTRATE, 2017. "Comparative analysis of evaluation models in insurance solvency," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania - AGER, vol. 0(Special), pages 27-36.
    14. Mohamed Elheddad & Mohga Bassim & Rizwan Ahmed, 2021. "FDI and economic growth in the GCC: does the oil sector matter?," Economics and Business Letters, Oviedo University Press, vol. 10(3), pages 178-190.
    15. Noor Zainab.Tunggal & Shariff Umar Shariff Abd. Kadir & Venus-Khim Sen Liew, 2018. "Panel Analysis of Monetary Model of ASEAN-5 Exchange Rates," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(11), pages 1-7, November.
    16. Shailesh Rastogi & Geetanjali Pinto & Amit Kumar Pathak & Satyendra Pratap Singh & Arpita Sharma & Souvik Banerjee & Jagjeevan Kanoujiya & Pracheta Tejasmayee, 2023. "Influence of Transparency and Disclosures on the Dividend Distribution Decisions in the Firms: Do Profitability and Efficiency of Firms Matter?," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-16, December.
    17. Wanglin Ma & Kathryn Bicknell & Alan Renwick, 2019. "Feed use intensification and technical efficiency of dairy farms in New Zealand," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 63(1), pages 20-38, January.
    18. Martey, Edward & Etwire, Prince Maxwell & Abdoulaye, Tahirou, 2020. "Welfare impacts of climate-smart agriculture in Ghana: Does row planting and drought-tolerant maize varieties matter?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    19. Wenhao Song & Chunhui Ye & Yuheng Liu & Weisong Cheng, 2021. "Do China’s Urban–Environmental Quality and Economic Growth Conform to the Environmental Kuznets Curve?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-15, December.
    20. Chen, Bin & Huang, Liquan, 2018. "Nonparametric testing for smooth structural changes in panel data models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 202(2), pages 245-267.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ijrema:v:32:y:2015:i:1:p:94-112. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/international-journal-of-research-in-marketing/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.