This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Extension of market exclusivity and its impact on the accessibility to essential medicines, and drug expense in Thailand: Analysis of the effect of TRIPs-Plus proposal

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Akaleephan, Chutima
Wibulpolprasert, Suwit
Sakulbumrungsil, Rungpetch
Luangruangrong, Paithip
Jitraknathee, Anchalee
Aeksaengsri, Achara
Udomaksorn, Siripa
Tangcharoensathien, Viroj
Tantivess, Sripen
Abstract

Background In Thailand and the US negotiating FTA, the [`]TRIPs-Plus' is one of the US proposal which would result in an extension of market exclusivity of innovative drugs. In addition, it would foreseeably lead to high and unaffordable medicine prices and inaccessibility to essential medicines.Objective To quantify the impact on medicine expense and medicine accessibility.Methods Based on 2000 to 2003 Thai Food and Drug Administration (FDA)'s and the Drug & Medical Supply Information Center (DMSIC), costs and accessibility were estimated upon the price and quantity costing between innovative drugs and their generics plus some parameters found from their competitive behaviour. Thereafter, we simulated the 10-year potential additional expense on the 2003 unit price of the patented and monopolized non-patented medicines.Results In 2003, the availability of generics helped to save 104.5% of actual expense and the accessibility would increase by 53.6%. By extension of market exclusivity, given that there were 60 new items approved annually, the cumulative potential expense was projected to be $US 6.2 million for the first year to $US 5215.8 million in tenth year.Conclusion The TRIPs-Plus proposal would result in a significant increase in the medicine expense; and a delay in the increase in drug accessibility via generics. Several options as well as other related mechanisms to help reduce the negative impact are proposed.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6V8X-4VD81HY-1/2/1ccd90eb870e2c27477167ee718dc3f8
File Format:
File Function:
Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Publisher Info
Article provided by Elsevier in its journal Health Policy.

Volume (Year): 91 (2009)
Issue (Month): 2 (July)
Pages: 174-182
Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:91:y:2009:i:2:p:174-182

Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/healthpol

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Heidi Boesdal) or ().

Related research
Keywords: TRIPs-Plus Market exclusivity Generic drugs Cost saving Policy Patents as topic Intellectual property;

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? Want to help out with this project? Look for volunteer opportunities.

This page was last updated on 2009-12-3.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.