IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/forpol/v109y2019ics1389934119301777.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Forest plantations in Southwestern Europe: A comparative trend analysis on investment returns, markets and policies

Author

Listed:
  • Pra, Alex
  • Masiero, Mauro
  • Barreiro, Susana
  • Tomé, Margarida
  • Martinez De Arano, Inazio
  • Orradre, Gabriel
  • Onaindia, Aitor
  • Brotto, Lucio
  • Pettenella, Davide

Abstract

This paper represents the first analysis of forest plantation investments on a comparative perspective in the context of Southwestern Europe. We estimated and compared potential investment returns at aggregate level for some of the most important productive forest plantation species in the region, including hybrid poplar in northern Italy, in Castile and León (Spain) and in Navarre (Spain), eucalyptus and maritime pine in Portugal, and radiata pine in the Basque Country (Spain). We carried out a financial analysis before-taxes, using typical capital budgeting indicators. Indicators were calculated according to a baseline scenario as well as in alternative scenarios, analyzing how the main policy and market factors influence returns. We also carried out a trend analysis to provide means for comparing the evolution of expected and actual returns in recent years. Overall, our results indicate that in Southwestern Europe there are some opportunities for reasonably attractive investment returns (IRR>5%) from forest plantations mainly for current landowners and forest products industry, and only in some cases potentially interesting also for financial investors. Nevertheless, there are significant differences among species and contexts as well as structural limitations in the region – i.e. related to timber market, biotic and abiotic risks and forest holdings structure – that new investors would have to take into consideration. More in specific, hybrid poplar plantations in Italy and Spain are estimated to provide on average the potentially highest returns, but the large range of variability and the high land and opportunity costs are unlikely to make them an attractive investment for non-landowners. Eucalyptus plantations in Portugal are estimated to be the only investment where non-landowners could expect to get relatively interesting and stable returns, although a recent law reform in the country could limit new investments. Maritime pine and radiata pine plantations in Portugal and Spain present lower returns, suffering the situation of depressed stumpage prices after the 2008 economic crisis, which strongly affected the sawmilling sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Pra, Alex & Masiero, Mauro & Barreiro, Susana & Tomé, Margarida & Martinez De Arano, Inazio & Orradre, Gabriel & Onaindia, Aitor & Brotto, Lucio & Pettenella, Davide, 2019. "Forest plantations in Southwestern Europe: A comparative trend analysis on investment returns, markets and policies," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:109:y:2019:i:c:s1389934119301777
    DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2019.102000
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934119301777
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.102000?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Birger Solberg, 2010. "Economics of Forest Resources," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 37(3), pages 423-426, September.
    2. Clair H. Redmond & Frederick W. Cubbage, 1988. "Portfolio Risk and Returns from Timber Asset Investments," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 64(4), pages 325-337.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Petri P. Karenlampi, 2022. "Two strategies for boreal forestry with goodwill in capitalization," Papers 2205.06744, arXiv.org.
    2. Petri P. Kärenlampi, 2022. "Two Manifestations of Market Premium in the Capitalization of Carbon Forest Estates," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-26, April.
    3. Fuertes, A. & Oliveira, N. & Cañellas, I. & Sixto, H. & Rodríguez-Soalleiro, R., 2021. "An economic overview of Populus spp. in Short Rotation Coppice systems under Mediterranean conditions: An assessment tool for decision-making," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    4. Yang Yi & Mingchang Shi & Jialin Liu & Chen Zhang & Xiaoding Yi & Sha Li & Chunyang Chen & Liangzhao Lin, 2022. "Spatial Distribution of Precise Suitability of Plantation: A Case Study of Main Coniferous Forests in Hubei Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-19, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eric Fur, 2023. "Risk and return of classic car market prices: passion or financial investment?," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 24(1), pages 59-68, February.
    2. La, Le & Mei, Bin, 2015. "Portfolio diversification through timber real estate investment trusts: A cointegration analysis," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 269-274.
    3. Cubbage, Frederick & Kanieski, Bruno & Rubilar, Rafael & Bussoni, Adriana & Olmos, Virginia Morales & Balmelli, Gustavo & Donagh, Patricio Mac & Lord, Roger & Hernández, Carmelo & Zhang, Pu & Huang, J, 2020. "Global timber investments, 2005 to 2017," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    4. Mats, Andersson & Gong, Peichen, 6. "Risk Preferences, Risk Perceptions and Timber Harvest Decisions – An Empirical Study of NIPF Owners in Northern Sweden," Scandinavian Forest Economics: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Scandinavian Society of Forest Economics, Scandinavian Society of Forest Economics, issue 42, April.
    5. Fur, Eric Le, 2021. "Fine Wines in a Diversified Portfolio of Collectibles," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315852, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    6. Busby, Gwenlyn M. & Binkley, Clark S. & Chudy, Rafal P., 2020. "Constructing optimal global timberland investment portfolios," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    7. Cochran, Steven J. & Mansur, Iqbal & Odusami, Babatunde, 2012. "Volatility persistence in metal returns: A FIGARCH approach," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 64(4), pages 287-305.
    8. Waggle, Doug & Johnson, Don T., 2009. "An analysis of the impact of timberland, farmland and commercial real estate in the asset allocation decisions of institutional investors," Review of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 90-96, April.
    9. Doug Waggle & Don T. Johnson, 2009. "An analysis of the impact of timberland, farmland and commercial real estate in the asset allocation decisions of institutional investors," Review of Financial Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(2), pages 90-96, April.
    10. Raunikar, Ronald & Buongiorno, Joseph & Prestemon, Jeffrey P. & Lee Abt, Karen, 2000. "Financial performance of mixed-age naturally regenerated loblolly-hardwood stands in the south central United States," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 1(3-4), pages 331-346, December.
    11. Gjolberg, Ole & Guttormsen, Atle G., 2002. "Real options in the forest: what if prices are mean-reverting?," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 4(1), pages 13-20, May.
    12. Tommy Lundgren, 2005. "Assessing the Investment Performance of Swedish Timberland: A Capital Asset Pricing Model Approach," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 81(3).
    13. John Livernois & Henry Thille & Xianqiang Zhang, 2006. "A test of the Hotelling rule using old‐growth timber data," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(1), pages 163-186, February.
    14. Hultkrantz, Lars & Mantalos, Panagiotis, 2018. "Hedging with trees: Tail-hedge discounting of long-term forestry returns," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 52-57.
    15. Allen, Pamela & McConnell, Kenneth E., 1991. "Explaining Risk in Asset Markets: A Varying Parameters Approach," 1991 Annual Meeting, August 4-7, Manhattan, Kansas 271159, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    16. Roessiger, Joerg & Griess, Verena C. & Härtl, Fabian & Clasen, Christian & Knoke, Thomas, 2013. "How economic performance of a stand increases due to decreased failure risk associated with the admixing of species," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 255(C), pages 58-69.
    17. Hyytiainen, Kari & Penttinen, Markku, 2008. "Applying portfolio optimisation to the harvesting decisions of non-industrial private forest owners," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 10(3), pages 151-160, January.
    18. Mei, Bin, 2019. "Timberland investments in the United States: A review and prospects," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    19. P. S. Morawakage & G. Earl & B. Liu & E. Roca & A. Omura, 2023. "Housing Risk and Returns in Submarkets with Spatial Dependence and Heterogeneity," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 67(4), pages 695-734, November.
    20. Veli-Pekka Heikkinen, 2003. "Timber Harvesting as a Part of the Portfolio Management: A Multiperiod Stochastic Optimisation Approach," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(1), pages 131-142, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:109:y:2019:i:c:s1389934119301777. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/forpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.