IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i9p3212-d803966.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Two Manifestations of Market Premium in the Capitalization of Carbon Forest Estates

Author

Listed:
  • Petri P. Kärenlampi

    (Lehtoi Research, FIN-81235 Lehtoi, Finland)

Abstract

In this study, the effect of capitalization premium in forest estate markets on forest management and climate change mitigation economics is investigated. It is shown that proportional goodwill in capitalization induces linear scaling of the financial return, without any contribution to sound management practices. However, there is a financial discontinuity, as harvesting deteriorates goodwill. Such deterioration might be partially avoided by entering the real estate market. Conversely, a capitalization premium set on bare land as a tangible asset would increase timber storage and carbon sequestration. Observations indicate that the proportional goodwill is closer to reality within the Nordic Region, resulting in continuity problems.

Suggested Citation

  • Petri P. Kärenlampi, 2022. "Two Manifestations of Market Premium in the Capitalization of Carbon Forest Estates," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-26, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:9:p:3212-:d:803966
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/9/3212/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/9/3212/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David H. Vrooman, 1978. "An Empirical Analysis of Determinants of Land Values in the Adirondack Park," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(2), pages 165-177, April.
    2. Chudy, R.P. & Hagler, R.W., 2020. "Dynamics of global roundwood prices – Cointegration analysis," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    3. Pra, Alex & Masiero, Mauro & Barreiro, Susana & Tomé, Margarida & Martinez De Arano, Inazio & Orradre, Gabriel & Onaindia, Aitor & Brotto, Lucio & Pettenella, Davide, 2019. "Forest plantations in Southwestern Europe: A comparative trend analysis on investment returns, markets and policies," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    4. Korhonen, J. & Zhang, Y. & Toppinen, A., 2016. "Examining timberland ownership and control strategies in the global forest sector," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 39-46.
    5. Busby, Gwenlyn M. & Binkley, Clark S. & Chudy, Rafal P., 2020. "Constructing optimal global timberland investment portfolios," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    6. Mei, Bin & Clutter, Michael L., 2020. "Return and information transmission of public and private timberland markets in the United States," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    7. Mei, Bin, 2019. "Timberland investments in the United States: A review and prospects," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    8. Cubbage, Frederick & Kanieski, Bruno & Rubilar, Rafael & Bussoni, Adriana & Olmos, Virginia Morales & Balmelli, Gustavo & Donagh, Patricio Mac & Lord, Roger & Hernández, Carmelo & Zhang, Pu & Huang, J, 2020. "Global timber investments, 2005 to 2017," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    9. Restrepo, Hector & Zhang, Weiyi & Mei, Bin, 2020. "The time-varying role of timberland in long-term, mixed-asset portfolios under the mean conditional value-at-risk framework," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    10. Lintunen, Jussi & Laturi, Jani & Uusivuori, Jussi, 2016. "How should a forest carbon rent policy be implemented?," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 31-39.
    11. Fabozzi, Frank J., 2015. "Capital Markets: Institutions, Instruments, and Risk Management, Fifth Edition," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 5, volume 1, number 0262029480, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Petri P. Karenlampi, 2022. "Two strategies for boreal forestry with goodwill in capitalization," Papers 2205.06744, arXiv.org.
    2. Kanieski da Silva, Bruno & Schons, Stella Z. & Cubbage, Frederick W. & Parajuli, Rajan, 2020. "Spatial and cross-product price linkages in the Brazilian pine timber markets," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    3. Cubbage, Frederick & Kanieski, Bruno & Rubilar, Rafael & Bussoni, Adriana & Olmos, Virginia Morales & Balmelli, Gustavo & Donagh, Patricio Mac & Lord, Roger & Hernández, Carmelo & Zhang, Pu & Huang, J, 2020. "Global timber investments, 2005 to 2017," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    4. Yang Yi & Mingchang Shi & Jialin Liu & Chen Zhang & Xiaoding Yi & Sha Li & Chunyang Chen & Liangzhao Lin, 2022. "Spatial Distribution of Precise Suitability of Plantation: A Case Study of Main Coniferous Forests in Hubei Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-19, May.
    5. Xindong Wei & Ning Wang & Pingping Luo & Jie Yang & Jian Zhang & Kangli Lin, 2021. "Spatiotemporal Assessment of Land Marketization and Its Driving Forces for Sustainable Urban–Rural Development in Shaanxi Province in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-20, July.
    6. Coleman, Andrew, 2018. "Forest-based carbon sequestration, and the role of forward, futures, and carbon-lending markets: A comparative institutions approach," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 95-104.
    7. Roy Chowdhury, Pranab K. & Brown, Daniel G., 2023. "Modeling the effects of carbon payments and forest owner cooperatives on carbon storage and revenue in Pacific Northwest forestlands," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    8. Samitas, Aristeidis & Papathanasiou, Spyros & Koutsokostas, Drosos & Kampouris, Elias, 2022. "Are timber and water investments safe-havens? A volatility spillover approach and portfolio hedging strategies for investors," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 47(PA).
    9. Juutinen, Artti & Ahtikoski, Anssi & Lehtonen, Mika & Mäkipää, Raisa & Ollikainen, Markku, 2018. "The impact of a short-term carbon payment scheme on forest management," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 115-127.
    10. Tuttle, Carrie M. & Heintzelman, Martin D., 2013. "The Value of Forever Wild: An Economic Analysis of Land Use in the Adirondacks," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 42(1), pages 119-138, April.
    11. Fuertes, A. & Oliveira, N. & Cañellas, I. & Sixto, H. & Rodríguez-Soalleiro, R., 2021. "An economic overview of Populus spp. in Short Rotation Coppice systems under Mediterranean conditions: An assessment tool for decision-making," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    12. Pohjola, Johanna & Laturi, Jani & Lintunen, Jussi & Uusivuori, Jussi, 2018. "Immediate and long-run impacts of a forest carbon policy—A market-level assessment with heterogeneous forest owners," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 94-105.
    13. Daigneault, Adam & Strong, Aaron L. & Meyer, Spencer R., 2021. "Benefits, costs, and feasibility of scaling up land conservation for maintaining ecosystem services in the Sebago Lake watershed, Maine, USA," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 48(C).
    14. Pinnschmidt, Arne & Yousefpour, Rasoul & Nölte, Anja & Hanewinkel, Marc, 2023. "Tropical mixed-species plantations can outperform monocultures in terms of carbon sequestration and economic return," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    15. Jonathan Yu-Meng Li, 2021. "Inverse Optimization of Convex Risk Functions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(11), pages 7113-7141, November.
    16. Frey, Gregory E. & Charnley, Susan & Makala, Jasper, 2021. "Economic viability of community-based forest management for certified timber production in southeastern Tanzania," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    17. Korhonen, Jaana & Henderson, Jesse D. & Prestemon, Jeffrey, 2023. "National forest timber bids and export price interlinkages in the USA: The bounds testing approach," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    18. Petri P. Kärenlampi, 2021. "Diversity of Carbon Storage Economics in Fertile Boreal Spruce ( Picea Abies ) Estates," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-18, January.
    19. Tingting Zhang & Shunbo Yao & Jinna Yu & Assem Abu Hatab & Zhen Liu, 2020. "Effects of China’s Collective Forestland Tenure Reform Policies on Forest Product Firm Values," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-20, April.
    20. Shang, Di & Diao, Gang & Zhao, Xiaodi, 2020. "Have China's regulations on imported waste paper improved its quality," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:9:p:3212-:d:803966. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.